Category talk:Chaldeans

Untitled

There's a problem of mixing in the same category Ancient "Chaldeans" and contemporary "Chaldeans" who have got nothing to do with the ancient ones, their name is somewhat like the names of the bishops in partibus infidelium, referring to ancient Roman provinces but without any real link to them. As Agathoclea seems to stick to her idea of keeping the Chaldeans category for ancient Chaldea, I suggest then to move the modern Chaldeans articles into another category, let's say... Assyro-Chaldeans, Assyrians, Syriacs, Arameans whatsoever ! --Pylambert 01:43, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. Should you find that equally difficult, as that seems a hot subject atm, it might be an idea to make 2 subcategories of chaldeans one for modern one for ancient. Agathoclea 07:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]