Jump to content

Talk:Would've, Could've, Should've/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Vaughan J. (talk | contribs) at 22:50, 14 May 2023 (GA Review: archive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 11:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This should be done today --K. Peake 11:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good!
  • ""Would've, Could've, Should've" is a new wave" → "it is a new wave"
  • Merge into one para lead since both are too short at three sentences
  • "emotional sentiments of the track," → "emotional sentiments of the song,"
  • "It was included in" → "The song was included in"
  • "Rolling Stone and Slant Magazine." → "Rolling Stone, and Slant Magazine."
 Done by OfTheUsername

Background

[edit]
  • "which features seven additional songs including" → "which features seven additional songs, including"
 Done by OfTheUsername
  • Since this section is a bit short, I would suggest moving the writing and production credits to here instead

Composition and lyrics

[edit]
  • The more acoustic production part is not actually sourced
  • Wikilink acoustic guitar
  • Wikilink as synthesizers
  • Why is Insider piped to a different one than Business Insider here but not later on?
  • Should you use a narrator instead of Swift about the lyrics when no narrator is actually mentioned by sources but she is?
  • "never would’ve danced" → "never would've danced"
  • "scared of ghosts"." → "scared of ghosts."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
  • ""of stealing her innocence and" → "of stealing her innocence, and" but why is PopMatters here when it offers no mention of this?
  • Remove the comma after 2010 song
  • Remove the "abusive" part from the relationship description because it is not sourced
  • Remove wikilink on Rolling Stone
  • "with second thoughts"" → "with second thoughts"." to end it correctly grammatically
 Done by OfTheUsername

Reception

[edit]
  • "decision to relegate it as a bonus track." → "decision to include as a bonus track." with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
  • [3][5][12][14][17] is too many refs grouped together; move around to different areas of the sentence to fix this
  • "A few agreed its status" → "A few agreed with the song's status"
  • "added that its painful lyrics" → "added that the painful lyrics"
  • "Wilson called it a" → "Wilson called the song a"
  • "deeming it not as" → "deeming the track not as"
  • "Slant Magazine (24th)[4] and" → "Slant Magazine (24th),[4] and"
  • "and the Vietnam Hot 100 chart (96)." → "and the Billboard Vietnam Hot 100 chart (96)." with the pipe
 Done by OfTheUsername

Credits and personnel

[edit]

Charts

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks pretty good at 34.6%!!
  • Why is ref 5 Insider (website) and ref 20 Business Insider? Either way, link to the correct one on both.
  • Why do refs 6 and 15 not have url-access limited?
  • Wikilink The Atlantic and add url-access registration on ref 19
  • It actually allows limited-free articles; changed it to limited
  • Remove the author from ref 27

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.