Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jabba the Hutt/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
At Delist still, User:Hog Farm
FACBot (talk | contribs)
Archiving 'Jabba the Hutt'
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--FARtop--><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #E6F2FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|featured article review]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review]]. No further edits should be made to this page.''

The article was '''delisted''' by [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] via [[User:FACBot|FACBot]] ([[User talk:FACBot|talk]]) 4:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1075958481&diff=1076631141&title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review%2FJabba_the_Hutt%2Farchive1].
----

===[[Jabba the Hutt]]===
===[[Jabba the Hutt]]===



<noinclude>{{la|Jabba the Hutt}}
{{Featured article tools|1=Jabba the Hutt}}</noinclude>
<!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. -->
<!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. -->
:<small>''Notified: [[User talk:Dmoon1|Dmoon1]], [[User talk:TAnthony|TAnthony]], [[User talk:UpdateNerd|UpdateNerd]], [[User talk:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]], [[User talk:Treybien|Treybien]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film|WikiProject Film]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Wars|WikiProject Star Wars]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters|WikiProject Fictional characters]], {{dif|1010038915|diff for talk page notification 2021-03-03}}''</small>
:<small>''Notified: [[User talk:Dmoon1|Dmoon1]], [[User talk:TAnthony|TAnthony]], [[User talk:UpdateNerd|UpdateNerd]], [[User talk:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]], [[User talk:Treybien|Treybien]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film|WikiProject Film]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Wars|WikiProject Star Wars]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters|WikiProject Fictional characters]], {{dif|1010038915|diff for talk page notification 2021-03-03}}''</small>
Line 36: Line 41:
:::::::::{{ping|Chompy Ace}} and {{ping|The helper5667}} what do you gys think of the article now? Anything that jumps out to you that I can fix? ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 03:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::{{ping|Chompy Ace}} and {{ping|The helper5667}} what do you gys think of the article now? Anything that jumps out to you that I can fix? ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 03:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
* Further improvements have either slowed down or stopped for at least a week or two. Also, one of editors whom Kaleeb18 pinged hasn't responded yet. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 02:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
* Further improvements have either slowed down or stopped for at least a week or two. Also, one of editors whom Kaleeb18 pinged hasn't responded yet. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 02:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
* '''Delist''', sample, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabba_the_Hutt&oldid=1072851134#Potential_film_project five-year-old] speculative content, and no one is working on the issues raised. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
* Delist, sample, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabba_the_Hutt&oldid=1072851134#Potential_film_project five-year-old] speculative content, and no one is working on the issues raised. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
*:{{done}} and y’all aren’t telling me what the problems really are. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 13:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
*:'''Done''' and y’all aren’t telling me what the problems really are. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 13:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
*::Hey {{ping|SandyGeorgia}} I think I might have fixed the issues now. Do you still see things I can fix. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 16:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
*::Hey {{ping|SandyGeorgia}} I think I might have fixed the issues now. Do you still see things I can fix. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 16:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
*:::I will catch once others have finished their reviews; sorry to be running behind. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
*:::I will catch once others have finished their reviews; sorry to be running behind. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Line 53: Line 58:
::::::: I suspect that it'll need a bit more work yet, but I'm not familiar at all with potential sourcing or even what is really currently standard for article like this, and I have no idea who to ask. Pinging {{u|George Ho}} as FAR nominator and {{u|David Fuchs}} as the one who left the notice. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 16:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
::::::: I suspect that it'll need a bit more work yet, but I'm not familiar at all with potential sourcing or even what is really currently standard for article like this, and I have no idea who to ask. Pinging {{u|George Ho}} as FAR nominator and {{u|David Fuchs}} as the one who left the notice. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 16:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{outdent|:::::::}} The article wasn't nominated GA ever. Rather it was promoted FA in 2006, and I've never reviewed FA nominations before. Nonetheless, I've taken FA-promoted articles to review before. Except [[Quatermass and the Pit]], most articles I've taken to review were delisted. The matter isn't whether the article meets FA's current standards. Rather it's whether the whole article still meets [[WP:FACR]]. <p> Regarding criterion #3 (Media), five non-free images and one free image are used. The lead image is still appropriate, and an image of the comic version of him is appropriately used as a body. Unsure what else to say about rationales. Most of file pages of those images seem to almost copy each other, and the lead image's rationale is almost complete. But those issues may be fixable. Regarding #4 (Length), well... the article has stayed on topic... hopefully, because the article has been about the fictional character. Unsure whether it's exactly "well written" (#1a), but the writing isn't too bad to my eyes. </p> Unsure about #1b (comprehensive) and #1c (well researched), but at least it kinda meets #1d~1f in my eyes. <s>Reading the lead, however, I was unsure how else to say about it. Well,</s> I {{dif|1075096337|changed one of the 'First appearance's in the infobox}} from "Star Wars" to "[[Return of the Jedi]]", which was his first real-world film appearance. Hopefully, no one objects to the change. Unsure about consistent citations (#2c), but I don't mind the reference style(s) used there. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 22:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{outdent|:::::::}} The article wasn't nominated GA ever. Rather it was promoted FA in 2006, and I've never reviewed FA nominations before. Nonetheless, I've taken FA-promoted articles to review before. Except [[Quatermass and the Pit]], most articles I've taken to review were delisted. The matter isn't whether the article meets FA's current standards. Rather it's whether the whole article still meets [[WP:FACR]]. <p> Regarding criterion #3 (Media), five non-free images and one free image are used. The lead image is still appropriate, and an image of the comic version of him is appropriately used as a body. Unsure what else to say about rationales. Most of file pages of those images seem to almost copy each other, and the lead image's rationale is almost complete. But those issues may be fixable. Regarding #4 (Length), well... the article has stayed on topic... hopefully, because the article has been about the fictional character. Unsure whether it's exactly "well written" (#1a), but the writing isn't too bad to my eyes. </p> Unsure about #1b (comprehensive) and #1c (well researched), but at least it kinda meets #1d~1f in my eyes. <s>Reading the lead, however, I was unsure how else to say about it. Well,</s> I {{dif|1075096337|changed one of the 'First appearance's in the infobox}} from "Star Wars" to "[[Return of the Jedi]]", which was his first real-world film appearance. Hopefully, no one objects to the change. Unsure about consistent citations (#2c), but I don't mind the reference style(s) used there. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 22:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
: When I was in a rush, I forgot my further comments about the lead. Three paragraphs are decent amount. I wasn't sure whether the lead emphasizes too much or too little. After re-readings, however, I guess there's nothing wrong with the lead as it is. The first paragraph briefly introduces the character and details his (fictional) language. <p> The second paragraph details what he really is in the right amount, but "the storyline context of the original trilogy" somewhat irks me because, as said before, his first real-world film appearance was ''Return of the Jedi'' and... well, when I was watching the original versions of the original trilogy, I couldn't pay attention to much of the dialogue and couldn't care less about Jabba as an off-screen character. Howevery, if anybody else here is fine with it, then... okay.</p> The third paragraph briefly his media appearances and what he symbolizes. So far, looks okay overall. BTW, I {{dif|1075100922|renamed "Cultural impact" to "In popular culture" and separated it from "Reception"}}, and I changed the {{dif|1075099436|sentence's tone more active}}. Are these edits okay? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 22:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
: When I was in a rush, I forgot my further comments about the lead. Three paragraphs are decent amount. I wasn't sure whether the lead emphasizes too much or too little. After re-readings, <s>however, I guess there's nothing wrong with the lead as it is.</s> The first paragraph briefly introduces the character and details his (fictional) language. <p> The second paragraph details what he really is in the right amount, but "the storyline context of the original trilogy" somewhat irks me because, as said before, his first real-world film appearance was ''Return of the Jedi'' and... well, when I was watching the original versions of the original trilogy, I couldn't pay attention to much of the dialogue and couldn't care less about Jabba as an off-screen character. Howevery, if anybody else here is fine with it, then... okay.</p> The third paragraph briefly his media appearances and what he symbolizes. <s>So far, looks okay overall.</s> BTW, I {{dif|1075100922|renamed "Cultural impact" to "In popular culture" and separated it from "Reception"}}, and I changed the {{dif|1075099436|sentence's tone more active}}. Are these edits okay? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 22:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
::: {{small|Changing my mind about the lead per SandyGeorgia's review. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 21:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)}}
::I think it passes #1b I looked for sources that could be major things and I found none. I also looked at Wookiepedia to see if that had anything major that we didn't, and there was none. I am also unsure about #1c but I know it is a lot better than before after I verified a lot more info. Definitely passes #1d, #2e, and for #1f. For #2a I actually think the lead is not bad surprisingly. I think #2b is good. I think #2c is good after I removed unverified info I could not find RS for it, and after I replaced citation needed templates. For #3 the only image I might have a problem with is the 2nd one. I can truly say that I think it passes #4 after reading it 3 times. Also {{U|George Ho}}, I think your edits are fine, but I do not think it really matter if "In popular culture" is its own section or in reception, but my opinion is that it stays in reception, but that is just my opinion. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 01:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::I think it passes #1b I looked for sources that could be major things and I found none. I also looked at Wookiepedia to see if that had anything major that we didn't, and there was none. I am also unsure about #1c but I know it is a lot better than before after I verified a lot more info. Definitely passes #1d, #2e, and for #1f. For #2a I actually think the lead is not bad surprisingly. I think #2b is good. I think #2c is good after I removed unverified info I could not find RS for it, and after I replaced citation needed templates. For #3 the only image I might have a problem with is the 2nd one. I can truly say that I think it passes #4 after reading it 3 times. Also {{U|George Ho}}, I think your edits are fine, but I do not think it really matter if "In popular culture" is its own section or in reception, but my opinion is that it stays in reception, but that is just my opinion. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 01:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::: If it doesn't belong in the article, then a screenshot of the deleted scene ([[:File:FordandMulholland.jpg]]) should be either in [[Declan Mulholland]] or PRODded (either manually with {{tls|PROD}} or via [[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]]). What would you like to do? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 02:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::: If it doesn't belong in the article, then a screenshot of the deleted scene ([[:File:FordandMulholland.jpg]]) should be either in [[Declan Mulholland]] or PRODded (either manually with {{tls|PROD}} or via [[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]]). What would you like to do? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 02:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Line 61: Line 67:
::::::{{ping|George Ho}} used for what? ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 13:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|George Ho}} used for what? ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 13:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{outdent|5}} {{ping|Kaleeb18}} I intend to use the "CGI" Jabba image(s), either 1997 and/or 2004 versions, for the "Episode IV: A New Hope" subsection to either compare with the stand-in actor image or replace it. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 20:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{outdent|5}} {{ping|Kaleeb18}} I intend to use the "CGI" Jabba image(s), either 1997 and/or 2004 versions, for the "Episode IV: A New Hope" subsection to either compare with the stand-in actor image or replace it. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 20:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|George Ho}} Maybe use the 1977 version so the readers can understand why it got a lot of hate. As seen in the critical response section. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 21:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::: {{ping|Kaleeb18}} When you typed "1977", do you mean 1997 Special Edition version or the original 1977 deleted scene one? --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 21:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
::::{{ping|George Ho}} oops my bad I meant 1997. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 22:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
:::::Hey {{U|George Ho}} would you mind looking over my rewrite of the lead and fixing any problems you might see. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 02:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


* https://carnegiemuseumnaturalhistory.tumblr.com/post/184620311591/is-jabba-the-hutt-a-slug is flagged by {{u|Headbomb}} as unreliable (I don't know where to figure out why, but it appears to be a museum employee blogging). If lots of sources think Jabba the Hutt is a slug, surely a better source can be found. If not, the information may be [[WP:UNDUE]]. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
* https://carnegiemuseumnaturalhistory.tumblr.com/post/184620311591/is-jabba-the-hutt-a-slug is flagged by {{u|Headbomb}} as unreliable (I don't know where to figure out why, but it appears to be a museum employee blogging). If lots of sources think Jabba the Hutt is a slug, surely a better source can be found. If not, the information may be [[WP:UNDUE]]. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
*:It's tumblr. Social media is as reliable as the account owner. &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 00:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
* None of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabba_the_Hutt&oldid=1075273985#Works_cited these are cited in the article]; unclear why they are there.
*: In fact, [https://www.starwars.com/databank/jabba-the-hutt here is Lucas Films] on slug, which is cited in the body of the article, so a) no need to cite it in the lead at all, b) it is not controversial, and c) no need to source to a marginal blog. That said the entire first para of the lead needs to be rewritten anyway. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
* <s>None of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabba_the_Hutt&oldid=1075273985#Works_cited these are cited in the article]; unclear why they are there.</s>
*: What was "Further reading" in the FA version, was incorrectly moved to "Works cited", and have now been deleted entirely. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
* Why is [https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Jabba_Desilijic_Tiure this in External links]?
* Why is [https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Jabba_Desilijic_Tiure this in External links]?
* What makes https://www.consumerfreedom.com/about/ a reliable source, and even if it is, it cannot be used to cite the sweeping statements that are sourced to it (sample: Outside literature, the character's name has become an insulting term of disparagement. To say that someone "looks like Jabba the Hutt" is commonly understood as a slur to impugn that person's weight or appearance.)
* What makes https://www.consumerfreedom.com/about/ a reliable source, and even if it is, it cannot be used to cite the sweeping statements that are sourced to it (sample: Outside literature, the character's name has become an insulting term of disparagement. To say that someone "looks like Jabba the Hutt" is commonly understood as a slur to impugn that person's weight or appearance.)
Line 75: Line 88:
* The lead is disorganized ... the first paragraph tells us who developed a language, which is surely not one of the most important things to know here. This is found in the lead:
* The lead is disorganized ... the first paragraph tells us who developed a language, which is surely not one of the most important things to know here. This is found in the lead:
** The character has incorporated prominently into Star Wars merchandising beginning with the marketing campaign corresponding with the theatrical release of Return of the Jedi.
** The character has incorporated prominently into Star Wars merchandising beginning with the marketing campaign corresponding with the theatrical release of Return of the Jedi.
I remain at Delist, as stated above; edits are being made but the article is not heading towards FA status. This was not even a comprehensive look; the glaring deficiencies here stand out on a cursory look; this article will be better served if delisted, with a return to FAC if it is rewritten. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
I '''remain at Delist''', as stated above; edits are being made but the article is not heading towards FA status. This was not even a comprehensive look; the glaring deficiencies here stand out on a cursory look; this article will be better served if delisted, with a return to FAC if it is rewritten. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|SandyGeorgia}} I have done all that you stated (I think). I didnt remove Wookiepedia from external links as that is pretty normal for a star wars character. See [[The Mandalorian (character)|The Mandalorian]], [[Luke Skywalker]], and [[Han Solo]] as references.
:: You [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jabba_the_Hutt&type=revision&diff=1075319847&oldid=1075273985 addressed almost nothing that I mentioned], and even if you had, I provided only samples of the prose issues. A top-to-bottom copyedit is needed; the prose is not at FA standards. There is no need to ping me again, until/unless an independent copyeditor, experienced with FA standards, has been through, and reliability of sources has been checked. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
:: Here is a sample of prose from the first paragraph in the lead:
::* . He was originally supposed to first appear in Star Wars (1977) as a stop motion character with Declan Mulholland as his stand-in ...
:: We can't get there from here ... this FAR needs to be shut down. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
*The article is significantly improved from where it was when I dropped off my comments on the talk page (and I want to credit [[User:Kaleeb18|Kaleeb18]] for the work they have done), but I agree with Sandy above it's still significantly distant from modern FA standards for an article of this type. The main issue is that the real-world reception and impact seems incredibly thin. A quick search on my local library's database and scholar.google.com picks up a lot of potential coverage for the thematic use of the character, but I feel like there's also got to be more general reception (perhaps going back to look at contemporary reviews so see how the character was received at the time?) [[User:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs</span>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 11:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
*:Thanks {{U|David Fuchs}}. Maybe I’ll try to work on this article some more later, when I become a more experienced editor. I just hate to see an article like this get delisted because we all know it’s likely this article wont be touched much for a while. ― [[User:Kaleeb18|<b style="background:#000;color:#f07b3a;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Kaleeb18</b>]][[User talk:Kaleeb18|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub style="position:relative;right:20q;margin-right:-15px;">Caleb</sub> 13:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
**Sometimes that's just the best outcome; going through another FAC in the future will make a better article. Whether or not it retains featured quality doesn't really relate much to how much attention it gets; most Wikipedia articles are just one or two dedicated editors from being substantially better, and your efforts have still made this article improved over the one viewers were reading a few months ago, so I don't think it's been a net negative. [[User:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs</span>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 15:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
** '''Delist''' for now, per David Fuchs; hopefully this one will be back at FAC some day. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 15:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 04:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''</div><!--FAbottom-->

Latest revision as of 00:15, 13 March 2022