Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics

Opinion poll criteria

A lot of surveys don't mention their margin of error, there could be even surveys without margin of error as they are confident enough about forecasting the exact numbers in the result. If they come from reliable sources and renowned news agencies, I think it still can be added with mentioning N/A for margin of error. For pre-poll surveys, I thing the numbers are the most important things. Any unreliable survey-conducting agency can also publish the datas with mentioning the sample size and margin of error. Hence I think things like margin of error are not must-need-things, the reliability of the publisher should be the criteria. What are the views of you guys about this? Ku423winz1 (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Comment I see your point, but I tend to disagree. While I agree that the reliability of the publisher is crucial, I believe that including the margin of error is essential even for confident forecasts. This transparency helps readers understand the certainty of the survey results and allows for a more informed interpretation. Also including the sample size is important. Overall, I think both the reliability of the publisher and the inclusion of the margin of error are important factors in assessing the credibility of survey data. 456legendtalk 11:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:United Front (India)#Requested move 27 June 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United Front (India)#Requested move 27 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Legislative Party

The article Legislative Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gnisacc (talk) 22:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Gaddam Venkatswamy

Could someone from this WikiProject take a look at Gaddam Venkatswamy? It has lots of unsourced content and has been tagged as such since 2011. In addition, some recent edits to it have only added more unsourced content as well as given it a promotional feel. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

2021 West Bengal post-poll violence

The article 2021 West Bengal post-poll violence seems to have come clear WP:NPOV issues, at least in its language. (see my post on the Talk page) This, combined with the dubious quality of its sources, leads me to believe that there may be other issues with the article's POV. If someone from this WikiProject (and with a greater degree of expertise regarding Indian politics) would be able to investigate/assess the article further, it would be much appreciated. There are also some general tone issues that need fixing. Thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 05:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)