Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Battle of Stuart's Pond

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
ProjectThis article has been rated as Project-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconMaryland Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This incident appears to be a user's invention

I have read extensively on the subject of the War of 1812 and have never before encountered this "Stuart's Pond" engagement, in which the article claims that 90 people were killed. It certainly is not mentioned in any of the three books that the article claims as references. I did a Google search for "Stuart's Pond" that recorded only four hits: one for the Wikipedia article, one for the Wikipedia category-'Conflicts in 1813' and two for Google's "Answers.com" which were both sourced to the Wikipedia article and quoted it verbatim. This alleged military engagement appears to be a hoax by a user and I think that the page ought to be deleted forthwith. Flonto (talk) 23:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that this section had been inserted by a user and removed as a hoax, I'm checking sources now... Tirronan (talk) 03:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]