Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Peer review

Overview
Project page	talk
College football Portal	talk
Participants	talk
Active editors
Project category	talk
Departments
Assessment (log)	talk
Peer review	talk
Article alerts	talk
Newsletter	talk
Style and content guides
Style guide	talk
Templates	talk
Image use	talk
Notability	talk
Reliable sources	talk
Vacated victories	talk
Master team table	talk
Team articles	talk
Yearly team pages format	talk
Coaching trees	talk
Major vs small college compendium	talk
External resources
Archived yearbooks	talk
Official guides	talk
Media guide errors	talk
Lists of pages needing help
To do list	talk
Cleanup listing	talk
Deletion reviews	talk
Unreferenced BLPs	talk
Campaigns
Season articles campaign	talk
The Perfect Season	talk
CFHOF article improvement	talk
Coach articles campaign	talk
Current season articles
2024 NCAA D-I FBS season	talk
2024–25 bowl games	talk
2024 FBS rankings	talk
2024 NCAA D-I FCS season	talk
2024 FCS rankings	talk
2024 NCAA D-II season	talk
2024 D-II rankings	talk
2024 NCAA D-III season	talk
2024 D-III rankings	talk
2024 NAIA season	talk
2024 NAIA rankings	talk
Current article checklists	talk
Tools
Project banner	talk
{{subst:CFBwelcome-project}}	talk
Photos on Commons
Userboxes
Project userbox	talk
NCAA teams	talk

view · edit · changes

Article development path

Start a new article
Develop the article
Check against featured article criteria and good article criteria
Get feedback from WikiProject
Get broader creative feedback
Apply for featured article or good article status
Featured articles and Good articles

Shortcuts

The peer review department of the College football WikiProject conducts peer reviews of articles on requests. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on. Generally, most reviews will be conducted before nominating an article for good article or featured article status.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the College football WikiProject. You do not need to be a member of the WikiProject to review an article.

WikiProject peer reviews
A Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject.

You can keep track of new reviews by watching this page; do that by clicking here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list too.

To list your review below:

Create the peer review following instructions here.
Add [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - December 2024 at the top of the list of requests below (where N is the archive number).

When the review is finished:

Follow the general instructions for peer reviews here.
Move [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - MONTH - YEAR from the list of active reviews to the list of old reviews.

To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.

If there are no articles below, or you want more articles, see Wikipedia:Good articles/Candidates#Sports for articles currently Good article candidates. You should not approve any article that you were involved heavily in editing or reviewing here, but you could help another article reach GA.

Requests

No current requests

Old requests