Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 20

< November 19	November 21 >

November 20

Template:UN declaration on sexual orientation and gender identity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UN declaration on sexual orientation and gender identity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The declaration is not a military conflict but a proposed UN resolution, so a military conflict infobox is inappropriate. Quigley (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The article already contains sections listing those states which have supported or opposed the Declaration. Using {{Infobox UN resolution}} may be a viable option, but the article does not indicate whether the statement was ever formally proposed as a resolution. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, the declaration isn't a military conflict. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jordanian Armed Forces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jordanian Armed Forces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete or redefine. This appears to be a conglomerate of a navigational template, infobox, and Portal. Not sure why it was defined or how it could be used to good effect. It should be deleted and redefined. Currently it is an "orphan" anyway. It would probably overshadow any Jordanian article that referenced it. In any event, it could easily be moved to someone's sandbox since it appears to serve no useful purpose in Wikipedia at this time. Student7 (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - intended to be a single-use template, and it recently was substed (diff) into the article Jordanian Armed Forces. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brother Bear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brother Bear (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Small template with only 5 articles including the main article. The sequel and the soundtrack are linked through the main film article, and the other 2 articles are just songs. Not everything needs a navbox. --LoЯd ۞pεth 03:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 08:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Yeah, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User broken wrist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, and redirect title to Template:User health inactive. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User broken wrist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think that this wikibreak template is a bit too specific. Surely the far more general {{User health inactive}} will suffice, and there is no need to have a separate template for every injury or illness. The template is transcluded on two user pages, both belonging to users who have not edited in the past 18 months (and one of whom is retired). (Template creator not notified because: indef-blocked) -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 00:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, way too specific and never used. {{User health inactive}} is sufficient. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to {{User health inactive}} for the sake of the two users who are using it. -- œ^™ 21:37, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be easy enough to replace the two transclusions, although it's worth noting that both users have been inactive for 1.5 years (and, so, it's unlikely that they are still affected by the same health issue). -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and replace any few transclusions. Rehman 05:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.