Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 13
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 May 13)
May 13
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Declined T2, even though I feel it blatantly misrepresents policy, specifically, NOR. Orphaned template. Sceptre (talk) 11:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- comment there were many more uses earlier in the day, they must be systematically removed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a good template. Subst and delete. Stifle (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - don't have a problem with the concept of the template, but it doesn't seem to be in use. Robofish (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as a test (non-admin close). Beeblebrox (talk) 16:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Template:HS111 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template is just sentences, which can be hard coded on to the article where they are necessary (only links to one article). blurredpeace ☮ 02:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
The idea is that it becomes part of a bigger thing, check out List of chordophones by Hornbostel-Sachs number and subsequent links for how this eventually should work out. Thanks Ninehouse (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please try again when you have worked it out, now tagged for speedy as a test. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.