Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 12 June 14 >

June 13

[edit]

Template:European Cup 1955–56

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Garion96 (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European Cup 1955–56 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template should be used to link between the articles listed within it, which is not the case here, and it would be impractical to do so in any case (there would be too many templates on each team's page). Furthermore, a template is not the place to store results of sporting competitions: the article European Cup 1955–56 contains this information. Jameboy (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Parkway Drive

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:R'n'B. JPG-GR (talk) 05:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parkway Drive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two albums and two EPs which were deleted as non-notable. Template is now used on only three articles with no hope of being used on more. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Metro Manila A(H1N1 Map) as of 8 June 2009

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Metro Manila A(H1N1 Map) as of 8 June 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Metro Manila A (H1N1 Map) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only on one article, and has a "timestamp" as part of its name, which is no longer descriptive, since the map it contains no longer describes what the template claims to portary (8 June; it actually portrays 12 June right now). Other articles have similar maps placed directly in the article. There is no update issues that are time sensitive, since none of the text is time sensitive except for the filename, and that doesn't matter because the file itself does not portray the events of that date, rather of 12 June instead, since it's been "updated". 70.29.212.226 (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Perhaps proposer may read Wikipedia:TFD#Reasons_to_delete_a_template first. Template used for only one page doesn't mean that it is subjected for deletion.
The only thing this template does is to present a single image and a legend key. This can be done directly with the [[Image:xxx|thumb|size|legend]] wikicode tag placed directly into the article. Many such templates have been deleted before at TfD with a subst and delete verdict. Contributions/70.29.212.226 (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I will rename it for the sake of no longer nominating for deletion.--The Wandering TravelerWIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT! 07:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This was done via a cut and paste move. I have requested a DB-histmerge to correct the error. However, it's still the same template, just renamed, so part of the rationale for deletion still applies. Contributions/70.29.212.226 (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Philippines 2009 swine flu map

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philippines 2009 swine flu map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only on one article, other articles have this placed directly into the article. There are no time sensitive issues that require frequent updating in this template either. 70.29.212.226 (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Perhaps proposer may read Wikipedia:TFD#Reasons_to_delete_a_template first. Template used for only one page doesn't mean that it is subjected for deletion.--The Wandering TravelerWIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT! 07:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing this template does is to present a single image and a legend key. This can be done directly with the [[Image:xxx|thumb|size|legend]] wikicode tag placed directly into the article. Many such templates have been deleted before at TfD with a subst and delete verdict. Contributions/70.29.212.226 (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note this is now completely unused, someone, not myself, has replaced the template with a direct embedding of the image. 70.29.212.226 (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; same rationale as above. There is no reason that the image has to be transcluded into the article rather than directly embedded into it. Also, "used for only one page" is routinely a reason for deleting templates at TfD. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 02:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The King of Queens

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Boldly redirected to replacement template. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The King of Queens (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A much better template has been created, please see the nominated page's talk page Sought | Knock Knock | Who's There? 00:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_June_13&oldid=1138693643"