Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 April 29
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 April 29)
April 29
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 06:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Template:Jessica Harp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unlike fellow ex-Wrecker Michelle Branch, Jessica has not had enough solo releases to warrant an article. Only one album (which was redirected), two singles, and that's it. Not nearly enough for its own template, as the "related topics" are already included on The Wreckers' template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. delldot ∇. 19:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Only links together three articles, and the character article and list both look to be merge fodder back to the main article. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 16:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 16:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly the character article looks due for a merging -- not sure about the list, as that'll depend on how things look after it and the main article get the cleaning up they need and deserve. But even without that, three is a number even dolphins can count to, which means it's not enough to require a navigation template. Toss it out of the sub at depth. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough articles to justify a navigational template; even if the character article isn't merged or deleted, these should all link to each other already anyway. Robofish (talk) 04:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.