Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 October 23

< October 22	October 24 >

October 23

Template:Kwame Kilpatrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kwame Kilpatrick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sparse, not useful, unnecessary. Many other far notable politicians, even those with their own scandals, do not have their own template. Kilpatrick doesn't need one either. Forteblast (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too narrow a template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Narrow in scope. Links in template could and should already be in the article or the article's "See also" section. While there are only four existing articles in the template there is the potential to expand into the criminal trials, etc. 21:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Diego transit topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Diego transit topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only on one page, Transportation in San Diego County and basically redundant to Template:Public Transportation in Greater San Diego. Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Is this a joke?, used on a template for being used on the right side of the article as a directory, the bottom one is designed for articles that are in the topic and this template is for the actual topic. This is a power hungry deletion request.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this is only going to be used on one article, why bother having it as a template? The box could be created directly on the page (and easily moved prior to deletion, if that is the decision that is made, by subst:ing it). -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Can't see that it will be used elsewhere. Nice-looking box, but it needn't be a template. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with Hawaiian717. I don't see any need to keep this as a template. If this is the only article it'll ever be used in, it can be made in the article itself. Chamal ^talk 03:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Singapore Squad 2006/07 ASEAN Football Championship -Winners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Singapore Squad 2006/07 ASEAN Football Championship -Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete A minor tournament, and per [23, 2008] and many previous discussion . Matthew_hk t c 16:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pee Jay 21:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 18:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Punkmorten (talk) 09:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Talmadge Sprinkle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G3 by Dlohcierekim, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters •^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps •HELP)} 15:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talmadge Sprinkle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Patent nonsense [ roux ] [x] 04:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G1 So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Can You Duet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Can You Duet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A bit too narrow of a template IMO. Only six articles, one of which is currently up for deletion. (I also think it's strange that one of the lower-placing winners has a chart single when the winners don't, but that's beside the point.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think it is useful, and ties stuff together like others do that have them (ie: American Idol)... I think that it could be imrpoved on and added to now and in the future CloversMallRat (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added onto with what? The only notable winner is Joey + Rory. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 04:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per CloversMallRat. [ roux ] [x] 18:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mel Gibson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mel Gibson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Mel Gibson Films. This adds nothing that is not in the other template. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or delete. -- Ned Scott 04:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not enough films listed to warrant an entire template. Pinkadelica ^{Say it...} 08:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The template is not really needed. The other one covers everything in it. Chamal ^talk 03:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mr. Criminal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, CSD G8 Mr.Z-man 18:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mr. Criminal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for a non-notable musical artist who has had all of his articles deleted. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 01:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete asap. Templates like this shouldn't have to sit in tfd for five days. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If all his articles are deleted, what's the need to keep his template? There's only one link left there now. Chamal ^talk 03:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.