Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 May 6
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2008 May 6)
May 6
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no consensus. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Template is inaccurate - each region has unique history of Christianity. See discussion page.. Bardcom (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Three different zones have separate histories for Christianity, and now there is an irreconcilable dispute about omitting one because of modern politics. Nuh uh. Just delete the useless thing, which will eventually be made redundant by separate templates anyways. All it does now is waste the time of contributors. If it is kept for whatever daft reasons it could be, I'd recommend renaming it History of Insular Christianity to avoid the [allegedly] POV anachronistic term. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Until someone creates the templates History of Christianity in England, History of Christianity in Scotland, History of Christianity in Wales and History of Christianity in Ireland, this is a useful template that collects all the articles on the history of Christianity in those nations together. I realise some object to the name 'British Isles', although it seems as good to me as any - but even if the name is changed, the template is worth keeping. Terraxos (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Above templates now created. Aatomic1 (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Terraxos, but also Move to {{History of Christianity in the British Isles}}. Neddyseagoon - talk 08:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment British Isles is also not accurate as the development of was very different in each region. --Bardcom (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete A square peg in a round hole. Aatomic1 (talk) 08:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a useful template that provides links to the subject for all areas of the British Isles in one comprehensive fashion. 86.27.229.204 (talk) 22:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 23:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep, but move to {{History of Christianity in the British Isles}}. It still isn't perfectly accurate, and more accurate, discriminate templates should be developed as soon as possible. Celarnor Talk to me 17:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphan template, unlikely to ever be used. — Magioladitis (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be a template or be useful for any purpose as it's content seems to just be a test edit. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Template:Fb team abb Bielefeld (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Bielefeld (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Bochum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Dortmund (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Duisburg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Energie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Hamburg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Hannover (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Hertha BSC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Fb team abb Werder Bremen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Created with wrong name (suppose to be without abb) and not used.--ClaudioMB (talk) 18:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 23:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
No longer used. It was for only one article so I added it directly there which makes it easier to update anyway. →Wordbuilder (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete it should have been deleted a long time ago. Templates for one article only are discouraged.--Crzycheetah 22:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 22:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Unused; made up of only a non-free image.. BJTalk 10:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The infobox inside the template does not make sense, at all.--Crzycheetah 22:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.