Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 12
March 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
It is a template that is not linked anywhere except for my sandbox, and I doubt that people will use this template.. STYROFOAM1994talkReview me! 21:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I must agree with the nominator. Nobody is using this template. Delete. おべんとう むすび (Contributions) 08:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Almost every article previously linked within this template has been deleted (including the article on the music artist the template is for), two of the three remaining are have been prod-ed. Additionally, only one article currently uses this template. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 17:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. It seems empty for me except for a few links about someone who seems to be non-notable. If the person doesn't have his own page on Wikipedia, then I don't believe they should have their own infobox. Just my opinion though. おべんとう むすび (Contributions) 08:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, per above; this template is probably eligible for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G6 (housekeeping), if an admin so wishes. GracenotesT § 17:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete Doug.(talk • contribs) 07:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Spam template. Created by an Anon back in 2005, this template is on 695++ WP:SPA account talk pages that at one point created NN bio article. Serves no other than to promote editthis.info and wikitree.org, and to use wikipedia to content beg. These are both Non-notable wikis being used on wikipedia for the sole purpose of gaining Adsense revenue, from scrapping Wikipedias content. — Hu12 (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete We shouldn't encourage people to post their nn bios on external websites. It's not our problem. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete – informing the user about what it means for a biographical article to be appropriate for Wikipedia seems somewhat more constructive than telling them to GTFO, not to mention possibly promotional aspects of the template mentioned by the nom. GracenotesT § 17:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.