Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 13
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2008 June 13)
June 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by User:Athaenara CSD T3. Non-admin closure. JPG-GR (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Template:Fu-re-in-why (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Deprecated by our vast array of copyright tags and fair use rationales. Use of these templates do not comply with WP:NFCC because they do not contain a valid fair use rationale. This will also apply for {{Fu-na-in-why}} ViperSnake151 20:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- First off, It's not used.. so why didn't you just speedy it? (so obviously I support its deletion) :) Secondly, ... the claim that a template doesn't meet the policy because forces the user to provide an explicit rationale (as a template argument) rather than providing a canned reason (which are frequently incorrectly applied), indicates that you need to review the policy a bit more carefully. --Gmaxwell (talk) 20:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 04:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
There is no basis in the laws of Israel that its government works are PD. — -Nard 00:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - agreed. Usually, they have some type of restrictions. JaakobouChalk Talk 17:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence to PD.ÜÖÏËÄ ÄËÏÖÜ (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.