Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Religion in Kerala

Religion in Kerala

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Tyriandrogo (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Tyriandrogo (talk · contribs)
3. ARJayay (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Religion in Kerala (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Christianity#I disagree with this edit

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

What they have written in that Christianity in kerala was formed in 52 AD but they do not have any proof other than a bunch of pictures of various churches and cartoons. Neither the church was agreed to conduct carbon dating of church in kodungaloor. This is the real vandalism and spread of lies. Christianity came to Kerala through merchants who started travelling from 600 CE and Portuguese travelers. all I wanted is to add these sentences to the paragraph under Christianity and it has been consistently taken down by a douche. "" However, the story of St Thomas coming to India in 52 CE has been contradicted by a recorded history. There was a Thomas who came, but he was a Syrian merchant, Thomas of Cana, and this happened around 500 or 600 CE. In-depth historical research on this topic can be found in the book [12] by a Canadian author and a former Christian monk Ishwar Sharan."" Ishwar Sharan is a respectable author and preacher and Voice of India publications is a know publisher in the country.

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Tyriandrogo (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:32, 9 November 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)