Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old. |
Pending changes reviewer
- Gwanki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Freedoxm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Even if you're not pending changes reviewer, you can reject pending changes by reverting them. Pending changes reviewer, on the other hand, gives you the ability to accept changes. Rusty 🐈 14:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I already know that, and the reason why im really requesting this is to accept pending changes and to reject them at the same time. (forgot to put the acceptance part) 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 03:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mon Bhai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RCP, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. Mon Bhai converse∫edits Mon Bhai (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Asteramellus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Malhar1234 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Malhar1234 (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 21:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, @Malhar1234, buddy. you were declined 2 times on related permissions this month. Please read the room (and related policies). You are closer to getting a WP:CIR block than getting advanced permissions. Sohom (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me! But I can't understand, what you want to say in last sentance, -"You are closer to getting a WP:CIR block than getting advanced permissions".
- If you don't mind can you explain me about that. Malhar1234 (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malhar1234 Looking at your talk page, you have received a warning for large language model usage (which is explicitly discouraged), and looking at your latest article Tripura Queen Pineapple, you still haven't stopped using large language models. That coupled with the fact that you appear to be hat collecting (repeatedly asking for advanced permissions with actually understanding/caring to check if you are qualified + you actually need them) makes me feel like you are not listening to feedback and/or are not caring enough to play by our rules, which (imo) makes you teetering close to a WP:CIR block. (also cc @ToadetteEdit who appears to be your mentor on the Growth extension who might be able to give you pointers on how to course-correct). Sohom (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I just got pinged. @Malhar1234, you should really stop requesting permissions and focus on writing content manually and not with the use of a LLM such as ChatGPT. Will be willing to guide you to become a better editor. Otherwise, by not listening or understanding my advises and advices (and warnings) from others, you will most likely be blocked for competency issues. Take it slow, and start learning by heeding to the warnings/advices, or otherwise you will face consequences. ToadetteEdit (2025 is here) 17:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malhar1234 Looking at your talk page, you have received a warning for large language model usage (which is explicitly discouraged), and looking at your latest article Tripura Queen Pineapple, you still haven't stopped using large language models. That coupled with the fact that you appear to be hat collecting (repeatedly asking for advanced permissions with actually understanding/caring to check if you are qualified + you actually need them) makes me feel like you are not listening to feedback and/or are not caring enough to play by our rules, which (imo) makes you teetering close to a WP:CIR block. (also cc @ToadetteEdit who appears to be your mentor on the Growth extension who might be able to give you pointers on how to course-correct). Sohom (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Blitzkriegswunder (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I patrol recent changes on occasion and have split part of Mikhail Gorbachev into General secretaryship of Mikhail Gorbachev. I have reverted countless non-constructive edits and I think I have enough experience to be a pending changes reviewer. I have also reviewed the GAN of Kiruko and Mizo Chieftainship. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- User was just renamed to User:Blitzkriegswunder. ToadetteEdit (2025 is here) 11:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Fathoms Below (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ultraodan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mithilanchalputra7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already done (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 08:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)