Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Indian Institute of Management Rohtak/1
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
There is a lot of uncited passages in the article, including several paragraphs. The "The 7th PAN-IIM World Management Conference" reads as promotional to me and can probably be removed. The gallery at the end of the article should probably be removed per WP:NOTGALLERY and the images redistributed throughout the article or removed. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Several passages in this article strike me as promotional. There is also a basic challenge with this topic, that the institute is only 14 years old, and consequently there hasn't been much time for material besides anything based on press releases to accumulate. I would love to be proved wrong about this, but I suspect it is a difficult topic to bring to the GA standard simply because of what the source material is. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree this is far from GA. It is also a hard topic to research if you are not Indian. I don't see anyone with the required skills going for this anytime soon. It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- The lede contains bad grammar and way too much detail. The whole thing is really promotional. I suspect that the nomination for good article status is promotional in nature, as well. The photographs placed in the article look like they are AI-generated. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.