Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Myst series
Appearance
Myst series
[edit]This all started when I randomly started improving Myst back in May, and then embarked on a grand campaign to shiny up all that is on the wiki. Uru: Ages Beyond Myst is at FAC currently, but is still GA and not needed to pass FTC. All the Myst articles should have been merged into the ten above. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support - good luck with the FAC - rst20xx (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support - topic is comprehensive on the Myst franchise, all requirements are fulfilled - Hekerui (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support – no problems that I can see. Excellent work. -- Sabre (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support igordebraga ≠ 01:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk Contributions 01:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose- The articles Mysterium and Mystralia are missing in the topic. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)- Fan conventions are a world apart from the actual published material (questions regarding the notability of those articles aside.) --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree such articles are not needed for the topic, but would probably be suitable for supplements. (Guyinblack25 talk 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC))
- I withdrew my opposition. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 12:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree such articles are not needed for the topic, but would probably be suitable for supplements. (Guyinblack25 talk 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC))
- Fan conventions are a world apart from the actual published material (questions regarding the notability of those articles aside.) --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support – looks good. Great work on all those articles. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 08:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Zginder 2009-02-05T19:14Z (UTC)
- Support: Was wondering when you were getting to this. I see no major issues. The articles are of high quality, share a defined scope, and an appropriate lead. (Guyinblack25 talk 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC))
- Support - meets WP:WIAFT.--TRUCO 18:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support - I went ahead and fixed the "Characters" link so it now links to "Characters of Myst" rather than just "Characters." Xnux the Echidna 18:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh whoops, my bad. Sorry! rst20xx (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support; fits the criteria. Good work. Tezkag72私にどなる私のはかい 04:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)