Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Deerfire high res.jpg

Wildfire

Reason: I feel that the composition isn't really good enough for FP, and the quality doesn't seem good enough either: blurry, low detail. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk

Delist — -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Voted almost unanimous keep on June 25th last year, when this larger version was uploaded. Even though it has faults, it's unique enough to keep as a FP. --Janke | Talk 07:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't think the standards have changed much since June 25th or even since the original nom. — BRIAN0918 • 2008-01-08 13:59Z
Keep per above. Spikebrennan (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep composition is very good, considering the rarity of this event. Same goes for quality. This is one of the more striking pictures I have seen of a wildfire. Clegs (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep great composition, plus drama! Wildlife huddled in a stream to escape surrounding fire. As for the focus; I cut a little slack for shooting a wildfire at night. I doubt there was a tripod handy. --Bridgecross (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rare and unique shot. No higher res version can be found. Jumping cheese 01:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hasn't this been an attempted delist several times for this image? Still meets FP criteria enough to be a featured picture, a great shot, very good composition. Cat-five - talk 08:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just looked up the answer to my own question, as far as I can find the original was put up for delisting and replaced with teh hi-res which is what's up for delisting now for essentially the same reasons the original was put up for delisting. Cat-five - talk 08:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Awesome image, besides being encyclopedic. --Shark face 217 03:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This image has won prizes outside of WP and has become one of the most recognisable wildlife images in the world. That is, it has become notable in its own right, not just for its information content. Let me write a stub about it. Samsara noadmin (talk) 13:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept . --jjron (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]