Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sunset flora kommune
Appearance
Self-nomination. I think this show some of the beauty in the landscape. Vidarlo 21:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Tilted horizon, and as many landscape pictures posted before this one is pretty but not really stunning, also it is not very specific and therefore does not add significantly to the Flora article. --Dschwen 23:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- Have you got anything with less clouds? We already have a lot of great sunset photographs, some of which are featured IIRC. - Mgm|(talk) 11:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- No, sadly, I have not got one with less clouds. I also think the clouds add some darkness to the image, which I think fits in nicely. --Vidarlo 16:20, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose The image does not relay any specific information about Flora, Norway (it could be Florida, USA for all I know). Nice photograph though. --mdd4696 01:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - As Mdd4696, this image isn't visually spectucular or show anything particularly significant (geography/people/landmarks..etc). --vaeiou 06:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose a nice picture but not stunning and not anything special. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 05:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nothing particularly special. Enochlau 15:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- ( − ) Oppose Could have been taken anywhere near the sea, so not really illustrative of Norway, and as mentioned above there is already plenty of really nice sunset photos. I think it would be better with some of the clouds cropped out, but still not FP quality IMO --Fir0002 21:35, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support. But we need more images of other things. Wikikiwi 21:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Just a note - it can't be Florida, we have a flat landscape! :-) Flcelloguy (A note?) 17:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Stunning but uninformative. - JustinWick 01:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 02:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)