Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Macropus giganteus - Brunkerville.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2019 at 17:43:44 (UTC)

Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 20:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination was never transcluded to WP:FPC. Resetting clock. MER-C 17:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geoffroi 20:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice bokeh, but the noise from shooting at ISO 1600 (needed for such a wide aperture) masks some of the detail. Haven't made my mind up yet. MER-C 11:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – texture-like artifacts on the bokeh on the lower third of the image (perhaps noise related!?). Bammesk (talk) 03:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - sharpening tool went a bit wonky on the background. JJ Harrison (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good, much better. I agree with MER-C, it is noisy and the noise shows in some areas, for example the underbelly. Good composition though. Weak support because of noise. Bammesk (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support - resolution goes some way towards compensating for noise. MER-C 13:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. Nice at small image sizes but I don't like the bokeh on the mother's pouch, haunch, and underside. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]