Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:LOLKeats.jpg

Reason: It provides a compelling, modern way to illustrate a poem with few other possibilities for illustration. The main person working on Ode on Indolence encouraged its nomination.
Articles this image appears in: Ode on Indolence - Limited time offer!
Creator: Based on an image by Commons:User:Simplicius

Support as nominator --Shoemaker's Holiday ^{Over 197 FCs served} 15:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - maybe it does but im going to oppose on the basis of the text font writing etc. Hard to follow in full res. I also think this has very very little value --Childzy ¤ Talk 15:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Has absolutely no value, unless included in Lolcat. ceranthor 15:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - hilarity value trumps any other concerns. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I can't say I'm very partial to the font of the text. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 18:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Twouldn't be a LOLKeats with any other. Shoemaker's Holiday ^{Over 197 FCs served} 18:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose This image seems closer to a FfD than FP status... Staxringold _talk^contribs 19:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support It goes against all my instincts, but I'm going to support this one. After looking through the criteria again, the only one I'm doubtful about is the EV (no 5); but I think it does help readers understand the article - it sums up the theme of the poem well. I'm not keen on the text going over the cat's paw, and the antialiasing isn't as effective as it might be, but given that the EV isn't for cat I can overlook the first, and the second isn't a huge issue. Plus it gets points for sheer brass neck... ;) Time3000 (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. The joke is getting old... and it's too small. MER-C 02:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Right then, having used my super closing powers I....

Have Not Promoted File:LOLKeats.jpg --Shoemaker's Holiday ^{Over 197 FCs served} 11:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --jjron (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]