Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Erigeron Glaucus.jpg

Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support but hmmm. In this case, the focus (literally and compositionally) is so much on the flower itself that you don't really get any feel for the actual plant, such as how big it is, its environment etc. I know full well that a good macro shot makes this sort of context difficult, but a photo like feels a bit sterile to me. It's technically almost perfect, but I don't learn as much as I would from a photo with more context. :-) Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good enc. and strong technicals. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 23:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pretty much perfect (except for the license of course :P). Kaldari (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support A version that featured the stems and leaves of the plant would be better, but this illustrates the flower well enough, and you can't ask for everything in one image. This is an analogous case to objections regarding headshots of animals. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Erigeron Glaucus.jpg --wadester 16 05:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]