Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Caltha palustris (navadna kalužnica).jpg

Caltha palustris flower

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2017 at 07:42:36 (UTC)

Original – Caltha palustris flower

Reason

good macroed image, blossoming and blooming

Articles in which this image appears

Caltha palustris

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

Petar Milošević

• Support as nominator – Mile (talk) 07:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
• Comment – Looks overexposed, oversaturated, or both. Sca (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• True, so i made debright and added some space in bottom as suggested on Commons. --Mile (talk) 19:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• Comment I struggle to see what makes this FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• Charlesjsharp, try to shot and you will see. --Mile (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• Well I don't do flowers Petar, but if I did I wouldn't choose F7.1. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• Charlesjsharp i do focus stacking. Because of that, my f is merely uninteresting stuff. And dont worry, i know what i am doing. Nothing is missing on this flower. By the way, made of 32 shots. That is a lot lot more than some...how much, f !? And in better quality than all single shots of flower. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• OK. I understand the F7.1, but shouldn't the image say that it is a composite of many images? You are right that a focus stack should produce very sharp images, but in this one the definition doesn't seem to be quite there, though I'm not opposing the image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• I added stacking into description. --Mile (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)