Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/John Bot
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs)
Automatic or Manually Assisted:Automatic, unsupervised
Programming Language(s): Python, using pywikipedia
Function Summary:Just Clearing the sandbox Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Daily
Edit rate requested: 4 edits per Hour, but you can chose too
Already has a bot flag (Y/N):No
Function Details:Cleans out the sandbox every 15 minutes or at a rate we can decide on. Will be run around 20:30 to 02:15 UTC. uses the clean_sandbox.py script in the pywikipedia framework.
Discussion
[edit]What is wrong with OverloadQBot? That seems to be working fine. And even if you were to run that bot, it would have to be continuous. Soxred93 | talk count bot 18:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for more information, there are actually two bots that clean the sandbox. Dreamy § 19:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OverloardQ's been doing it a lot more recently, though. That just shows however, that another bot like that is unnecessary. Soxred93 | talk count bot 19:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The other is Uncle G's 'bot. Dreamy § 19:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OverloadQBot seems to be currently down. Either way I withdraw my request. I'm come up with a better bot idea another time. I apologize for wasting your time. Thank you for your input, Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 19:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The other is Uncle G's 'bot. Dreamy § 19:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OverloardQ's been doing it a lot more recently, though. That just shows however, that another bot like that is unnecessary. Soxred93 | talk count bot 19:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.