Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optare Viedo
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Optare Toro. Merging seemed the best move here. I've merged some of the content over and attributed it. Anything I've missed can be copied over from the history. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 10:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Optare Viedo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable, It seems this bus was never built, or If It was there's not one bit of information about the bus anywhere.
Davey2010 Talk 04:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom, unlikely to progress from stub due to that reason. Not notable.Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 19:13, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Optare Toro as a variant of that model. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.