Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death to the Supermodels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death to the Supermodels

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very thin on sources. Two of them only mention that the film was shot in Costa Rica and say nothing else. The two reviews cited are from websites that do not seem to be reliable. Prod contested due to reviews Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DVD Talk is considered a reliable source, it has a full staff and is a major critic at Rotten Tomatoes, but more rs is needed. Was the Hollywood Reporter piece a review? Atlantic306 (talk) 23:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't verify the veracity of the Hollywood Reporter review since Google Books doesn't give a preview. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Turns out the Hollywood Reporter source is just a directory listing and not an actual review. I found a direct copy of it and posted below. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Review at DVDTalk (which has repeatedly been discussed on Wikipedia forums and was determined to be a reliable source). Also, the HR review. Two reviews, passes WP:NFILM. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Hollywood Reporter clipping is not a review, but rather a directory listing. You can read the entirety of it here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, more rs needed then Atlantic306 (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we lack actual reviews of other GNG passing sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are reviews for the film that appear in DVD Talk found here; Film Critics United here; and Impulse Gamer here. While weak, that does meet WP:NFILM if you consider the sources RS. --Kbabej (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG is intentionally somewhat of low bar for inclusion, and WP:NFILM raises that bar higher. The reviews provided by Kbabej above provides enough to clear both, though. -2pou (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.