User talk:Zhwiki2943

Good Day to every body

December 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Republic TV, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 16:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read this, this is not a opinion peace, multiple reliable sources like this from CNN mentions Republic TV as righ-wing. So don’t remove it. GrabUp - Talk 16:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GrabUp The CNN source cannot be used. They are a rival news broadcaster with their own "conflict of interest" and ideology. You will notice I did not delete the content or its references, I simply moved it out from the lead where it was giving a misleading first impression especially as it was not explicitly supported by the article text. If you can find Republic TV describing themselves as "right wing" or "conservative" it can go back in the lead section. Zh Wiki Jack ★ Talk

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Republic TV. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 04:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Blaxstocatamazon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]