User talk:Younger Stallion

July 2016

I really didn't understand what was going on there. But instead of leaving summaries like that (which usually signifies a vandal), please mention that the users have made a mistake, remove the warning messages and message them. This would avoid problems like this.

Regarding your first edit, moths and butterflies do not need a comparison, but thanks for catching the later edits.

3primetime3 (talk) 19:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing this thing. Sadly I have already been blocked when I thought I was the one fighting vandalism. That's Wikipedia for you. Younger Stallion (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been in similar incidents as you. But please watch your language towards other users. Simply message the user(s) that are messing up. I've contacted the blocking admin and asked for unblocking. Please hold :) 3primetime3 (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I highly doubt you are still here, but it looks like the blocking admin has other reasons to keep you blocked from editing. If you would like to appeal the block by using template:Unblock, you may try to do so here. 3primetime3 (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all the same for trying. I appreciate your help and your advice. I'll be back editing soon, have no worries! :) --Younger Stallion (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Younger Stallion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fresh start pleaze. Mistakes made on launch of account now all rectified and not to be resumed. THX. --Younger Stallion (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why did you use edit summaries like a vandal would? PhilKnight (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

-- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 20:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]