User talk:Xexerss/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Xexerss. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Hello, Xexerss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Opencooper (talk) 03:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Opencooper (talk) 03:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 1989. I noticed that you recently removed content from Naruto Uzumaki without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 1989 (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Your addition to List of Ushio and Tora episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 14:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of Ushio and Tora episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 14:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samurai 8: The Tale of Hachimaru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoshin Engi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please, can you create List of Yoshitsune (TV series) characters? Thank you. --79.44.235.28 08:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of Zetman characters, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Announced is the of manga of Dragon Ball GT by Saikyou Jump in June 2, 2019 look site: https://comicbook.com/anime/2019/06/02/dragon-ball-gt-manga-resume-anime/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:431:B724:9523:E470:5384:A87B:7DEB (talk) 03:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Twelve Kingdoms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating List of Kaguya-sama: Love Is War chapters.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please provide attribution in your edit summaries when you copy content from another article. It is both technically a legal necessity to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policies, and lets other editors know that the content predates other sites mirroring it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

木崎さんのなりすましにより、悪戯投稿をしたことを反省します。木崎さんのなり済ましをして申し訳ありませんでした。今後は荒らし編集をしないように、心がけて編集をするようお願いします。--153.135.76.23 (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi! I found this edit in Doraemon. Please keep in mind it's common for links to expire. Kindly do not remove links only if they are 404'ed - there are resources for getting archived copies available: Wayback Machine, webcitation, archive.is, and Megalodon. There is an archive of this page at http://archive.is/VwU1O so I will link to that.

Please note that since 21st Century mostly publishes works in Chinese, Chinese-language hits for the name in Chinese 二十一世纪出版社集团 will be far more common than hits in English. Do note that this is a bilingual English-Chinese edition published by that company (I used to own some volumes of it myself that I bought in Beijing). WhisperToMe (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Also I was able to create another archive of the link, which in fact seems to be live, at http://web.archive.org/web/20190803193036/http://www.21cccc.com/mainpages/bookInfo.aspx?ID=504 . I archived this to http://archive.is/EGVVb . I also archived at Megalodon.jp at https://megalodon.jp/2019-0804-0436-07/www.21cccc.com/mainpages/bookInfo.aspx?ID=504 WhisperToMe (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of best-selling manga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Stop adding One Piece future predicted sales and Demon Slayer's franchise future predicted sales figures, Volume 18 is not even out yet and you have added the predicted sales figure which includes not only manga, other publications like spin-offs in List of best-selling manga for demon slayer. Read WP:FUTURE Panda619 (talk) 11:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Xexerss

Thank you for creating List of Mob Psycho 100 characters.

User:MJL, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter)

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MJL}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hell's Paradise: Jigokuraku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Beat

I Am a Hero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Action

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Sunday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hirokazu Kobayashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ultimo (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I saw your new template at Template:Monogatari and I found it a bit curious. Are Katanagatari and Monogatari part of a single Nisio Isin series? His website, for example, seems to suggest otherwise: http://ni.siois.in/works/. — Goszei (talk) 07:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Law of Ueki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroshi Watanabe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Xexerss

I found some long-lost Japanese Manga magazine templates that I resurrected and I was wondering if you'll fix the titles of the manga to make sure people will understand. Here are the templates.

• Template:Comic Flapper
• Template:Comic Yuri Hime
• Template:Monthly Shōnen Ace
• Template:Monthly Comic Rex
• Template:Monthly Dragon Age
• Template:Manga Time Kirara Carat
• Template:Kodansha's Dessert

Here you go.--Landingdude13^talk 08:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

I guess I can make some improvements, thanks for letting me know. - Xexerss (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Xexerss. I noted that you moved a good chunk of the article Parasyte to create List of Parasyte characters. This is ok if you make sure that this is acknowledged. Some people do it through their edit summary but it's even better if you use the template {{copied}}. For List of Parasyte characters, you can see that I just added it to Talk:List of Parasyte characters. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychic Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atsushi Ōkubo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soul Eater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

If you confirm about Super HxEros Genre, so please check out Original Japanese wiki page of Dokyuu Hentai HxEros. SakalkarOm (talk) 09:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but genres need sources. If the Japanese Wiki lists a genre, that doesn't automatically implies it is confirmed. - Xexerss (talk) 10:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Xexerss

I found this template (Template:Toei Doga) and this template is for anime films made by Toei Animation. For some reason, it wasn't complete and I was thinking that you'll fixed up all the way through this year (2020). I'm pretty sure you're the expert on anime and to make sure people will understand.

Later.--Landingdude13^talk 11:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I will try to make myself time to fix it. Should this template also include, for example, the Dragon Ball and One Piece feature films? - Xexerss (talk) 17:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely! This template will include every film by Toei Animation. - Landingdude13 (talk) 05:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fruits Basket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laura Bailey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Xexerss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Zetman characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Do you need to say stuff like "Stop this nonsense" or "Stop it" all because of these little edits. I'm not trying to be rude nor attack you but you need to calm down a bit.

BTW Ninku did air in English on Animax BTW https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/bbs/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3050281&start=45 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.192.108 (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I re-added the source stating that the series was broadcast on Animax Asia, sorry about that. Anyway, even if it is true, a forum discussion is not by any means a reliable source. - Xexerss (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there. father's debt was correct here. I'm not saying this to get at you, but just in case you were planning a campaign with more edits like this. Obviously, I agree with your other ones where you correctly straightened out contractions! Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, it was my mistake. Thanks for the correction! - Xexerss (talk) 08:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

You're v v welcome! Have a great day, cheers, DBaK (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by not dubbed? The video clearly has it dubbed see for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDa1cVzQBUw&t=286s

You must've only seen the opening as the actual episode itself is dubbed, I am not kidding.

See, it even has a DVD release: https://www.tokopedia.com/yohanesff/kaset-dvd-anime-ninku-dubbing-bahasa-indonesia-promo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.19.207.170 (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Add reliable sources, please. A video from a random Youtube user or a low quality image from a random retailer don't count as reliable sources. Even if what you're saying is true, it must be verifiable by reliable sources. In fact, I'm trying to search info about the series translation in Indonesia and I couldn't find any reliable link and only fan links. - Xexerss (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

OK sorry. - 47.19.207.170 (talk) 1:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

		The Anime and Manga BarnSakura
		Happy two years of editing, and thank you for your tireless and invaluable edits to anime and manga articles! — Goszei (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Since you created the Hantsu × Trash article which was missing, can you also create two articles that they are also missing? They are:

Paradise of Innocence, which received an OVA/OAD adaptation and a spin-off manga;

Akuma no Memumemu-chan, which received an ONA adaptation.

Thanks. - Tebus19 (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. - Xexerss (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenichi: The Mightiest Disciple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BS11.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Xexerss, there is another missing article about a manga, can you create it? It's The Island of Giant Insects, which received an OVA/OAD adaptation, an anime film adaptation, and a sequel manga.

Thanks.- Tebus19 (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I'll make it soon. Thanks for letting me know. - Xexerss (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry if i disturb you again, but i'm here to tell you that there is also a long character section to be added in The Island of Giant Insects.

Thanks.- Tebus19 (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I was planning on adding it later. If I'm right, I think Anime News Network have articles with the entire cast for both the Japanese and English dub.- Xexerss (talk) 23:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MAO (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kagome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

About Rurouni Kenshin: Restoration. Sadly, that manga was never published in my country but from what reviewers say (and due to my experience with the classic series) Watsuki tends to talk a lot about the series' making so if you get to find a book, there might be more stuff to add. Also, the first volume is lacking the prequel chapter summary but I don't remember it well. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Sadly, I don't have the volumes. There must be some articles or interviews in Japanese online for the production, but I can't find anything by now. - Xexerss (talk) 20:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I tried cleaning up Shishio's article considering how the liveaction films resulted in comments about his role in the story. However, I couldn't find too much about Enishi's reception other than 4 or 5 sources. Guess we'll have to wait for his liveaction movie.Tintor2 (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Is there something about Shishio that can be added to the Rurouni Kenshin: Master of Flame article? I think that it was created to promote the second live-action film, but I'm not entirely sure. - Xexerss (talk) 00:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Sadly, I didn't even find something about Master of Flame. Shishio's reception seems solid with variety focused on his main appearances and the liveaction.Tintor2 (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

I did some google of Master of Flame but apparently it was never serialized in English regions. The only thing I found was a commentary involving Watsuki and his wife Kurosaki involving how they feel about this work. I left it in Shishio Makoto's article after a big clean up to reduce inunviverse info and expand outofuniverse info. However, I think it would be good if you revised the prose of Shishio's article (as well as Restoration) since English is not my first language.Tintor2 (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Xexerss, there is new article to create about a manga with a newly announced TV anime adaptation, can you create it? It's Cestvs.

Link: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2020-11-05/kento-ankoku-den-cestvs-kento-shito-den-cestvs-manga-get-tv-anime-in-april-2021/.166004

Thanks.- Tebus19 (talk) 16:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. - Xexerss (talk) 00:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Great job on all of your new manga articles. When you create them, though, could you please tag them with Template:WikiProject Anime and manga? A quality rating (likely start/stub) and importance rating (likely low) would also be appreciated. — Goszei (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, I tend to forget it. I will add them from now on. - Xexerss (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I wrote stuff on Sneeze: Naoki Urasawa Story Collection in my sandbox. Do you think I should add it to the page as is or should I put all the production info in a separate Production section? Xfansd (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, great job!...Uh, I'm not entirely sure. Maybe an "overview" section or a section with similar title could work. I think in this case the background of each story can figure with the own story to make it all more readable instead of making a different production section. - Xexerss (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello my friend !

Thank you very much for taking care of The Promised Neverland's wikipedia, you're doing an amazing job.

The Promised Neverland is the 6th most sold manga this year in japan, so I think you should add this information on the wikipedia. Phil81194 (talk) 08:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, I saw an image stating so, but sadly, I can't find yet any reliable link referring to it. Oricon's official list just has the top 5 best-selling manga of the year [1]. I will add the info when a reliable source can confirm this. - Xexerss (talk) 08:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

90M in Japan was announced when Bleach manga ended. It did not specifically state/include WW or digital. Knowing Bleach's previous circulation numbers in Japan, it's easy to deduce that 90M was Japan only.

Worldwide 120M number was first announced by the movie website. https://wwws.warnerbros.co.jp/bleach-movie/about/

That's where the information Manga Zenkan uses is from. I'll leave it upto you if you want to revise Bleach's wiki back to what 90M in Japan and 120M total WW or leave it as is.

Manga Zenkan is a good source but it's not updated frequently enough. So please use it with discretion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.52.29.76 (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

I don't exactly agree with you reverting my formatting change. I was trying to tidy up the wiki source. I think it's harmless either way, any particular reason you need/want to keep the article as is?

Shentino (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

See MOS:LISTGAP. - Xexerss (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

May I know why did you revert my contribution on the List of The Promised Neverland episodes page? You didn't give any reason. Thanks. 2A04:CEC0:1191:24F2:B948:2B39:9FB1:6E13 (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Officially, the series has not yet aired in Japan, so the number of episodes should not be increased for now. As for the theme songs, it's preferable to use secondary sources to use the official anime website, so there was no reason to change the ANN link. Also, we should use Japanese characters for songs written with Japanese titles, but not for the artists. I re-added the titles change. - Xexerss (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

The first episode was released on Amazon Prime Video Japan, isn't that enough to update the number? These secondary sources don't directly specify the original japanese titles of the themes, why would the primary source which cites both the opening and the ending theme be removed? If one should stay, it is the primary source. We don't have an article about Kiiro Akiyama, so his japanese and romanized names should be included, where do you see that we should do otherwise? Also his name is Kiiro Akiyama (秋山黄色, Akiyama Kiiro) not Kiro Akiyama. 2A04:CEC0:117A:4337:4AAC:7289:CA34:48C4 (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

We should prioritize its television broadcasting premiere. See WP:PSTS, primary sources are fine too, but secondary sources have priority, and titles don't really need a source for such a thing as their original title characters, it's enough to know that they are or are not officially written with Japanese characters. Honestly, I don't know if this has been discussed, but I think that there are no reasons to extend the name of people writing their Japanese names in kanji/kana if the article doesn't require it, we don't list every Japanese people's name without an article using the nihongo template, so I think the addition was unnecessary, but I added a link to the Japanese Wikipedia article, that should be enough. Well, I suppose there are no problems changing his name to Kiiro as various English websites use that name instead of Kiro, although it is also commonly used on various sites. - Xexerss (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Tatsuki Fujimoto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

I will try to improve the article. Cheers. - Xexerss (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I apologize to you if I came off as rude. And thanks for rewording.

Hi. No problem, no reason to apologize, but next time try to be as neutral as possible with the descriptions. See WP:AESTHETIC. Cheers. - Xexerss (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Wind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi,1- in all Wikis, the info box logo in Redo of Healer is File: Kaifuku Jutsushi no Yarinaoshi logo.png Even the Japanese Wikipedia and this article is translated from that wiki. 2- In this article, having a section for each character helps to link to that character if needed elsewhere or even in this article LordProfo (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Xexerss,

Why would you create this category, then nominate it for deletion but not post the CFD query on the CFD page? If you want this category, you can just request this as the page creator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Oops, sorry, I think I added the wrong template. I made the category by mistake. I wanted to create the Category:Manga magazines navigational boxes instead. - Xexerss (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Misato Katsuragi § Misato on Rebuild.. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

If you've got the time, I'd appreciate if you could chip in Talk:Kaworu Nagisa#Third Opinion. Thank you.FelipeFritschF (talk) 04:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

		The Writer's Barnstar
		Thank you for creating pages for numerous manga series, such as Jujutsu Kaisen, My Hero Academia Smash!!, The Elusive Samurai, and many more. Keep up the great work! Link20XX (talk) 03:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I know that the nunber of circulation is not the same as the number of sales, but when this type of news are written, they are actually refering to the number of sales. If you go to the references of most of the manga in the List of best-selling manga, you'll see that most titles are "X manga reaches X copies in circulation". And then we use that number in the sales figure, because in the 99.9% of times they are referring to the number of sales. Cracker-Kun (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

@Cracker-Kun: Regarding Mashle, it doesn't seem that they are referring to the number of sales. They're saying that with the publication of the 6th volume (on April 30, not released yet) the manga will have over 1.4 million copies in circulation, and not, in most cases the sources just talk about copies in circulation and not the actual sales. For example, Kimetsu no Yaiba in one instance had over 100 million copies in circulation and it was also stated that of that 100 million copies, around 90 million copies were sold. Also, if you check the list of best-selling manga article, you will notice that most of the series have a dagger (†) symbol, which means copies in circulation rather than sold, because in most cases the sources don't usually refer to actual copies sold. - Xexerss (talk) 01:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Xexerss: True, I will pay more attention to whether the source talks about copies in circulation or sales, and just by curiosity, are you japanese? Cracker-Kun (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Cracker-Kun: No, I'm not lol. I just use Google Translate, but anyway, the own Japanese sources usually will tell if they're talking about cumulative circulation or actual copies sold. - Xexerss (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Xexerss: I do the same, I am currently looking for the sales of the manga Phoenix of Tezuka (they are not even in the japanese wiki) and the overseas sales of the Doraemon manga (I've already found the China's ones), if u wanna help btw. Cracker-Kun (talk) 11:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks to a friend who scanned Katsura Hoshino's interviews of D.Gray-man from an artbook, I managed to expand the production section of D.Gray-man. It got way too big so I tried dividing subsections similar to Chainsawman or Jujutsu Kaisen. Could you give it a look and revise any issue possible? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Great job! I'll try to check it thoroughly soon, but I took a general look anyway, and although I don't know if it's necessary, I've seen that the character creation content for a series tends to be included in the respective list of characters article instead of the series' own article, for example in Shaman King, Dragon Ball, Jujutsu Kaisen, Soul Eater and many others, but again, I'm not sure if this is a must to do. - Xexerss (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sayonara, Zetsubou-Sensei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I want to do something more to honor Kentaro Miura. When browsing through wikidata and other language versions of Wikipedia, I noticed there are some of his works that don't have an English Wikipedia article but do in other languages. King of Wolves has an article in Japanese and Italian, and Gigantomachia has a Wikidata item. Want to make some kind of an arrangement to make articles for those series? Link20XX (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

@Link20XX: Sure. I'll try to make time to work on them. - Xexerss (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Alright. We should probably coordinate so we don't create the same article twice. Which one of those do you want to create? Link20XX (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

@Link20XX: I'll start with Gigantomachia. I could make the King Of Wolves article too. - Xexerss (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Okay. If I can help in any way, hit me up on my talk page. Link20XX (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

How do you create articles so fast???? Also I found the wikidata item for King of Wolves. Link20XX (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

@Link20XX: Well, usually I just copy and paste the infobox and volume template from other articles and replace the content. Adding the info from ANN, Natalie and other websites is not hard using the citation template. This took me like 30 minutes. If you can, could you add a plot section or add its chapters? - Xexerss (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

I will see what I can do. Also, you should consider applying to get WP:AUTOPAT. Link20XX (talk) 03:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

The article Ayanashi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG, would have redirected to its magazine, Shōnen Magazine R, but that mag does not have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: I added some more sources to the article, including reviews from IGN and Splash Comics. - Xexerss (talk) 20:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for your contributions and work on the Duranki article, the publication information you added is a huge plus and now the whole thing is looking very clean and solid. Bagabondo (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@Bagabondo:Thanks as well for creating the article. I haven't read the series yet, so I don't know about the plot or characters, but I'll add more content if I find something else. Cheers. - Xexerss (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Xexerss,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rurouni Kenshin (TV series) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: Hello. The Rurouni Kenshin (TV series) content was moved from the Rurouni Kenshin article. I left a copied template on the talk page of the article for this move. By the way, it seems that this link just copied and pasted the content of the same Rurouni Kenshin article. - Rurouni Kenshin (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rurouni Kenshin, my mistake, apologies. The copyvio tool seems to look everywhere but Wikipedia. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

About the article, I'm not sure what image should be used since I never dealed with anime adaptation articles. I guess the first VHS or DVD might help or a DVD box. From my understanding the image should provide a common understanding of the series' subject so I'm pretty sure it could be one of that has the logo of Rurouni Kenshin. I guess another image for Samurai X could be used in release in a similar way I did with the article X (manga) as X was often published in the West under the name of X/1999 which resulted in a different style of covers for the books.Tintor2 (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I remember an image from MyAnimeList, I guess, of the Kyoto arc, which features most of the main cast, except Yahiko (but I don't know if that is relevant). I suppose that is the kind of image that would be fitting to the article. - Xexerss (talk) 00:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

If it has the logo and at least Kenshin I guess it works. For example, say Danganronpa 3: The End of Hope's Peak High School. I added a promotional image of that showed its two leads since it was divided into two arcs while s-CRY-ed has a tendency to often show the two leads together.Tintor2 (talk) 00:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I thought about writing a brief plot section but, I wonder, if I were to briefly mention the changes the anime has without having an actual source, would that count as original research? I remember the anime added several stuff like Kaoru's father, the Hiruma brothers, the doctor's grandchildren, the organization of the Oniwabanshu arc, etc.Tintor2 (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Tintor2: There must be some reliable reviews explaining something about the changes. Perhaps Watsuki wrote something about those changes in volumes, I don't really know, though. Anyway, as far as I can recall, those characters were not that relevant to the overall story, so they could maybe be added to the production section, if there is something written about them out there. - Xexerss (talk) 19:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berserk (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young Animal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Do you know if Haou Airen is truly licensed by Viz? I've tried to find that manga on their web but nothing appears, maybe the license expired. Cracker-Kun (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

@Cracker-Kun: I couldn't find anything on Viz archived links or English volumes on Amazon. It seems that it was never actually licensed by them. - Xexerss (talk) 03:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

You are one of the ones that reverted an edit on Yashahime, which you are right, I could not find an article on Crunchyroll which supported it. Therefore, the information was not reliable. However, what you reverted the section back to is an a reliable source but it was just an personal opinion on the writers and not any real data. I don’t think it should be there either. I never seen personal opinions in the reception areas. In addition, I looked up two other anime mention in the article on Wikipedia this source was not used on either of them. I would remove it but you use Wikipedia more to know what is allowed in that section. I don’t think it should be there. FedualJapan (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: I don't know what are you talking about, but if you're referring to the Anime News Network article, that "personal opinion" is a review from a reliable website, and that's what reviews are after all, personal opinions, but they should be added because they are considered professionals and not mere fans of the show. - Xexerss (talk) 20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@Xexerss: The beginning of that first comment was agreeing with you that is what I was talking about.

The second part, I see your point but maybe I am not explaining it well. Maybe, if you read the two articles and compare? I went to Inuyasha wikipedia and I found this: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/inuyasha-gn-23.

It is a professional review on a professional reliable website.

In contrast, this is just a personal opinion that lack professionalism from a professional on a reliable website. It is a “Personal opinion” like a mere fan not as a review as a professional. Please be respectful. https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/2021-03-29/the-best-and-worst-anime-of-winter-2021/.171109 And if they should be added why isn’t it added to all the anime listed instead of just one (to my knowledge)? FedualJapan (talk) 20:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: No one says that the reviews of the other shows can't be added to their respective articles. I honestly don't get the comparison or why do just insist their opinions are not valid. If you disagree with their take on the show, feel free to add a more positive review that could be found on one of these websites, but just because it is not a positive review, it doesn't mean that it should be removed. - Xexerss (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@Xexerss: Xexerss, You misunderstood my points, my point was that it was not added to the other articles I checked because that article is irrelevant in that section. Why is it added to one and not all because it is unreliable. If the articles were read than you would fully understand and if you knew how unreliable the authors are. It has nothing to do with their take on the show, I would be saying this on their positive reviews and wait... I did. When I mentioned they were not added to the two positives ones I checked because it is an unreliable opinion. People just added more positive reviews with reliable sources but they were removed. Again it had nothing to do with a negative or positive reviews it is an unreliable opinion. None of my comments should gave anyone that impression. Again if this unreliable opinion should be added then why isn’t it added to other pages where it gave positive reviews instead of just one anime mentioned to my knowledge? Because it not an unreliable opinion but on a reliable source. I have not seen a opinion like this used on Wikipedia over my years of using Wikipedia. FedualJapan (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@Xexerss: And you just removed reliable sources on the reception of Yashahime and added back an opinion not a reliable source on the reception section. FedualJapan (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: Did you not read what I said? no one says that the reviews from that link can't be added to the respective shows. And for the last time, I don't get why do you insist their opinions are "unreliable". The tone of their reviews of whatever don't make them less valid, it's just their take and that's all. There's nothing stating that the reviews need to have a "serious tone" or something like that as long as the website is considered reliable. And I removed that "reliable" piece of content, because it was poorly sourced and can't be verified, that was all. - Xexerss (talk) 21:29, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Xexerss. I could ask you the same thing. “ no one says that the reviews from that link can't be added to the respective shows” that is your interpretation of my words and not what I was saying at all. If you read the articles and know about the authors you would know. Looks like many has this opinion on them. Yes it was their take as a mere fan not as a professional. And that is why it is less valid. Nothing about “tone” or a “serious tone.” Also, if you believe in that unreliable opinion than why don’t you add it to all the articles of the anime they mentioned. Don’t allow it on one, if you will not add it to the others, if you believe that highly of their opinions. I think you are talking about the other source at the end, why are you defending that? I agreed and had no issues. Would you step back and take a breath and read this again. You have made many assumptions and none have been correct. Please be respectful. Oh maybe I made an assumption. But I will ask instead of going what I first interpreted. or are you talking about the other that was just added? They seemed to had it sourced it well when I looked. But there was another one that was removed. I don’t know how this will look and I don’t know the code for it. Therefore, I removed the < >, This should be added: The anime is ranked 4.3/5 in Crunchyroll.

ref. "Yashahime: Princess Half-Demon - Reviews". Crunchyroll. /ref It was sourced. Verifiable. A true reception. If the positive reviews are being removed how would people know and I think the truth should always be posted not some unprofessional opinion. FedualJapan (talk) 21:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: Look, if someone wants to add those reviews from the ANN link to the respective articles, there's no problem. It is not my job to add those reviews to every article. I kept the ANN link on the Yashahime article because the website is considered reliable, that's all. I'm not forced to add every review from the link to those articles to make valid my point. Secondly, is this serious? Crunchyroll rating is user-generated, same reason why MyAnimeList or IMDb ratings are not useful and not considered valid at all. Seriously, I'm done, I don't even know what is your point anymore. - Xexerss (talk) 22:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Xexerss, I don’t want to add it to any but it makes me wonder why they only added to one. The website is reliable but not that article. I don’t force you or even insinuated that. Sheesh. It’s just you seem deeply devoted to keeping that unreliable opinion on one page that if you cared, so much you could add it to the others. Why did you consider that being forced? Ratings from IMDD, Crunchyroll, tomatoes, Nielsen’s and etc. have been used on many articles on Wikipedia. It would appear many don’t share your opinion or you have your work cut out for you. However, they add it because user generated data and ratings are part of the reception. Please be respectful and maybe if you took the time to comprehend, you will learn that my point is very simple to understand. Maybe you do understand but just want to act the way you are. Shrug. Over the months I had respect for you but I have moved on from that. Thanks for understanding and having an awesome attitude that makes Wikipedia a great place to connect and communicate to others. I learn that more-experienced Wikipedia users do take the time to comprehend and help instead of being rude and condescending that doesn’t assume or falsely accuse you. Thanks, I know who to go to if I have another concern. Bye. FedualJapan (talk) 23:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: If that ANN link is currently added only to the Yashahime reception, it doesn't mean that it NECESSARILY need to be added to every other show reviewed in that link. If I haven't done it personally, it's because I don't need to and I'm not focused on that task, that's all, but it's not because the reviews are not valid, ok? (also, I was not even the one who added that ANN link, but anyway, I'm also opposed to have it removed); Secondly, unlike what you are saying, the ratings, for IMDb for example, are used when it is review aggregation (from professional reviewers, not the audience). I personally have never seen a single article using the Crunchyroll user rating as a source, and if it is used, it should be removed, per WP:USERGENERATED. I'm sorry if you thought that I was being rude, but I tried to explain the same thing over and over and you refuse to understand that the opinions from the ANN reviewers are still valid, as long as the website is considered a reliable one, and there is nothing stating that they should be removed for whatever reason you think they are wrong/not valid. There's also nothing stating that it should be removed because it was an "express review/opinion" (or something like that) instead of a more structured review. - Xexerss (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

xexerss: I am coming from the point of view “It is only fair, it is added to all or none at all.” And probably an anti adding it.

Again, that article is not a review but a personal fan opinion. I have seen personal seen audiences ratings in Wikipedia articles.

 You see, I know, there are differences between a professional review and a personal opinion. 

You do understand this comment of yours is rude, “ I tried to explain the same thing over and over and you refuse to understand.” No, that is not what happened here at all, and that is more talking about yourself there.

How about for example I put, “I have tried to explain my point over and over but you refuse to understand or acknowledge what I said because you are trying to be right when you know you are wrong. Instead of acknowledging your mistake or misunderstanding, it is best to put the blame on me and make it like I am wrong by refusing to understand your point of view when you have assume and falsely accused me.” That would be more accurate. If you read that article you know it not a professional review at all. And again it is not just me that thinks that. You explained your opinion over and over is not my refusal to understand your opinion but knowing the difference between a professional review and personal opinion. That article you are defending is not a review or a reception, it is an personal opinion like ours. I believe you know the truth and that is why you are saying I refused to listen, falsely accusing me, acting like you don’t understand me to be right, and you said I think they are wrong when it is not my opinion. Let me add, you have said you don’t understand my point, which is unfair to say I refuse to listen because we are on two different pages. The article you are defending is an unreliable opinion on an reliable website. The first article I posted is a professional review on the same website. I know the difference and you refuse to understand the difference. It is not refusing to understand your opinion on the matter. It is you refusing my real point which you claim to not understand.

Therefore, we are talking about different things and I hope you will understand. Please understand when someone says sorry and then followed by an if, that if means you don’t take responsibility for your actions. Example: I am sorry I hurt you vs I am sorry if I hurt you. Think about it.

Please understand I said bye because I moved on from this topic because I understood you the whole time and it is sad you don’t see that or that we are talking about two different things.

In addition, you said you were done and with that, it means you were not willing to listen or understand the other page of the book. No point trying after you said your done. I acknowledge and left. I acknowledge it and I am saying bye again. The damage is already done. So, bye. FedualJapan (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: But again, why do you insist that it is an unreliable/invalid opinion? because it's not a structured review and it's just a more simple and kinda informal opinion? Where does it say that it does make it less valid and, therefore, it must be removed? The issue then is about how do you think the reception section must work and not about how the reviewers gave their viewpoint. Those opinions came from the staff of Anime News Network, not simply internet anime fans, and if you think that only the specific and more structured review articles from the website are valid, that is your standpoint, and there is currently nothing stating that the other kind of review/commentary/opinion can't be added. That's the end then, bye. - Xexerss (talk) 01:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Xexerss... “That link is not a review or a reception, it is an personal opinion” that answers your questions. But you had issues comprehending, it seems. You see a personal opinion, professional or not, is unreliable for a reception. It is not about one person’s opinion, it is more than that. Look up review vs opinion. As an Wikipedia editor you must know that and that article is not a good article for the reception section. It is common sense.

And again?! see you are trying to make me the blame: “ The issue then is about how do you think the reception section must work and not about how the reviewers gave their viewpoint.” False.

How you worded that any review could be posted, fan or staff because a fan would be a reviewer giving their viewpoints. They are staff but they are fans too. That article was a fan viewpoint from staff, which implies from your standpoint, any review could be referenced in the reception section.

This indicates my point is still misunderstood. “ if you think that only the specific and more structured review articles from the website are valid, that is your standpoint, and there is currently nothing stating that the other kind of review/commentary/opinion can't be added.”

That is not my point or what I am saying at all. It is not my standpoint in what is difference between personal opinions from a staff and a professional review. I am sorry that you can’t tell the difference or acknowledge my real point because you want to be right in your false argument on my point and accept an invalid article because it just a personal opinion to be right. __ What I get any review could be add if it on a reliable website. Again saying it in a different way, it is common sense a personal opinion is not a professional review. That article is a not a professional review meant for the reception area. I know I have been clear in this and I don’t understand why there is this issues besides trying to be right. You know the difference and you know I am right. If not, If you are having problems with understanding others on Wikipedia or misunderstanding something very clear, then I suggest a new hobby. In your attempt to be right and trying to enforce your own view of my point on me, it does not put me down nor does your blaming me instead it reflects only you, like your understanding of plain English and of others. Now please stop blaming me, imposing false assumptions and arguments on me. Stop changing my point to be right. Stop making it my opinion and viewpoint when it is not and it is just common sense.

Please let this drop. It would be easier to accept you had made a mistake and misunderstood me than holding on to that and try to enforce that point of view on me while blaming me. I wanted a real conversation with someone I had came to respect.

Bottom line: By your actions and words, you know that article is unusable but you don’t want to admit to your mistake when it would been easier. And you know what I would had still have respect for you. Maybe even more. Please let this be the end. It was wonderful talking to you. I look forward to the next time. Have a great day! I will definitely come back to you when I have a problem because you understand so easily and make a conversation problem free. Man! I wished I had those understanding skills and able to help others in a caring way when they come to me. Have a great life! FedualJapan (talk) 02:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

@FedualJapan: Enter here or here. Feel free to discuss if that kind of ANN opinions or whatever are valid or not, and if there's a consensus that it must be removed, then it will be removed. Now, please, stop. This discussion has been insanely long. - Xexerss (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the links. I did stop, without you asking, see last two paragraphs in my last comment. Thanks again FedualJapan (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

In the past months I expanded Akudama Drive but I don't know if it's properly arranged or if the episodes should be given its own list (kinda like Devilman: Crybaby). What do you think should be done about it? Still, I'm not sure about nominating the article so I requested to the Guild to copyedit bot Akudama and Darker than Black, mostly because of their recent expansions.Tintor2 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I haven't read the article, but at first glance it looks overall pretty good to me. I personally think that a list of episodes is feasible, since it has various sources, a summary for each episode and home video release, not to mention the content that could be added in lead. I haven't watched the series yet lol, but I could check the article later and try to help in any way I can. - Xexerss (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weekly Young Magazine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biomega.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Go and check COAMIX's official website the rigts are owned by COAMIX & Tetsuo Hara MrChaveX (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)