Jump to content

User talk:WCIDFS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, WCIDFS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! John Vandenberg (chat) 06:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rino Sashihara notability issues

[edit]

Hi. I see you replaced the redirect at Rino Sashihara with the earlier unsourced text, but unfortunately this does not meet the standards of WP:MUSICBIO, and also contravenes the WP:BLP guidelines about unsourced articles on living people, so I have reinstated the redirect to AKB48. If, at a later date, you are able to add reliable third-party sourcing to the article to demonstrate sufficient self-standing notability, please feel free to reinstate the article text. But I do suggest you read through the guidelines at WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BLP first. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really read through the article before reverted it to redirect? I added information about her TV program, which makes her status matching WP:MUSICBIO. ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 05:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And, I need to ask you if articles for Japanese idols are only evaluated by musician's standard you quoted, not only Sashihara's case, especially for some of those quite a part of whose media appearances are unrelated to their music activities but more "variety" programs. If Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers applies, the person's article should go with that standard, instead of musician's one, I think.---What can I do for someone?- (talk)
That's true; the notability criteria for general entertainers do seem to offer more leeway. But either way, we still need some reliable third-party sourcing beyond links to the person's own website or that of their agency in order to conform to WP:BLP. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I reinstated the article with third-party information as well as other information which supports her notability added.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 06:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shinji Kagawa

[edit]

We know he hasn't signed the contract, it's in all the sources. But he has AGREED to sign the contract, all the personal terms have been AGREED. He will only sign the contract when the medical is passed and he has a work permit. That's why we used the word "agreed", rather than "signed". – PeeJay 10:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The clubs wouldn't say that Kagawa has agreed a contract if he hadn't agreed the contract. As I have tried to tell you a number of times, WE KNOW he hasn't actually "put pen to paper", but he has agreed to the terms presented to him. – PeeJay 18:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then, show me reliable sources which CLEARLY STATES what you are saying.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 19:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Particularly, you are trying to say "Kagawa agreed a deal", it means he agreed all the terms and conditions on the contract, but I wonder if everything has been settled COMPLETELY, since he has not "put pen to paper yet".---What can I do for someone?- (talk)
He hasn't put pen to paper because he hasn't yet been to Manchester; he is currently on international duty and wants to focus on playing well for Japan. As for a reliable source as to the agreement, how's this one? To quote that page, "Manchester United is delighted to announce that it has agreed terms with both Borussia Dortmund and Shinji Kagawa for his transfer to the Club. The deal is subject only to the player medical and obtaining a UK work permit. These conditions are anticipated to be completed by the end of June." So, according to Manchester United, the transfer fee and the details of the contract have been agreed. Sufficient? – PeeJay 19:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic men's football

[edit]

Please dont enter your own original analysis of possible permutations. This is an encyclpaedia NOT a weblogLihaas (talk) 23:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Such descriptions has been posted on several different articles such as FIFA World Cup, UEFA European Football Championship, etc. in the past, not unusual, and the information I posted on the article which you pointed out is correct.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're using the wrong tie breaking rules to determine the possible outcomes. This is why you cannot, in most cases, determine anything until the last round. Please stop posting them.
It works in the World Cup and the Euros because tie breakers are head-to-head and may put teams in advantageous positions despite goal difference. This is not the case in the olympics. In order to make a complete list of possibilities you would have to have so many subclauses that it would be impossible to read. Athox (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are misunderstanding the factor. It is NOT a tie breakers. For example, Japan just defeated Morocco, making their point as 6, then no other 2 teams can surpass Japan at the end of the group stage. Therefore, they are FOR SURE to be 2nd place or higher already.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that is what the green colour is for. There are other examples where you are wrong in making your "lists". For example you said Belarus will advance if they do not lose to Egypt, which is wrong. If they draw and New Zealand beats Brazil with enough goals, NZ will pass Belarus even if Belarus already beat NZ. These are things which you seem to be missing in your analysis.Athox (talk) 18:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it was my mistake. but what about everything else on my edit]?
It seems that you merely would like to delete it NO MATTER WHAT the fact is.
Also, I am NOT the one changed the background colour of the chart, but someone else already changed the background colour of Brazil before I made a change on Group D one. ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do not add [synthesis]. This is not a weblog but an encycloapedia, it not a sports magazine/ either.
Also see WP:OSE, it hsould not have been elsewhere either.Lihaas (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How dare you say "Do not"? Are you an administrator to have a right to ORDER ME? ARE YOU THE ONE SET THE STANDARD? I am NOT the one putting such descriptions, but HAS BEEN POSTED FREQUENTLY on different articles. Do not come back to my talkpage unless you succeeded to make a rule to ENFORCE it or STANDARDIZE it on Wikipedia. ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 09:44, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that someone else already put the chart serving the same purpose. Try delete all if you have a right to do so, otherwise shut up and do not return here again. I am sick of you and your tyranny. ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 10:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent years

[edit]

From WP:RY:

"Births
Births are only to be included if there are Wikipedia articles in at least ten languages about the individual in question.

Deaths
The same criteria apply to deaths as to births." Cresix (talk) 21:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment at Talk: 2012#Minimum requirement to list a death. Cresix (talk) 21:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation on removal of edits

[edit]

Hi, WCIDFS. Another editor recommended that I stop by and explain to you why I reverted your edits to Senkaku Islands dispute and 2012 China anti-Japanese demonstrations. The thing is, Wikipedia is not a newspaper. We don't want to report on every single thing that happens that is vaguely connected to a subject. The change from one level of government agent to a lower level matters in some sense, but it's not a major even in the history of the dispute on the islands, so putting it there would violate WP:UNDUE. As for the demonstrations article, it actually has nothing at all to do with that article, which should only be about the actual protests themselves. If you want to discuss the matter further, we can open a discussion on Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Emperor's Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shogo Shimada, Daisuke Ito and Junya Tanaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shintaro Ishihara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shunichi Suzuki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korea Football Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Park Jong-Woo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kensuke Nagai

[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking and stop your disruptive editing.--Oleola (talk) 12:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you are misunderstanding what U-18 and U-19 national teams are for. Those under-age teams are formed to make it to Japan national under-20 football team after all, since U-18 team are be for the qualifier of AFC U-19 Championship, which serves as one of the qualifiers for the FIFA U-20 World Cup. Therefore, it does not make any sense to create individual articles for U-18 and U-19 teams, so as the links to those articles. Creating links to the articles which are not, and will not, exist is more disruptive. Thanks ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not an argument, European U-21 Championships are qualifiers for U-23 Olympics, and you don't link U-23 or Olympic to U-21. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking clearly states "Do not be afraid to create links to potential articles that do not yet exist". U-18 is U-18 not U-20 and should have separate article.--Oleola (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He does not have European nationality, but Japan, which belongs to AFC, thus IMPOSSIBLE to participate in the European U-21 Championships. Do not apply European standard to those who are not from Europe. ---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter, it's just an example, U-18 national team is not U-20 national team.--Oleola (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Oleola (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a time to explain further now, but should say that I am strongly against what you are saying. You do not understand how Japanese national teams by ages are consisted of AT ALL. You should learn about it more, not about whatever UEFA or your country applies.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 17:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent date format

[edit]

Hello.

When adding information to an article, please consider the existing date format in the article, and adapt your addition to that, so that inconsistent date format is not introduced. I am thinking of the article on Masato Uchishiba.

Thank you.

HandsomeFella (talk) 10:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

[edit]

Hey WCIDFS; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for educating me about the difference between the Kirin Cup and the Kirin Challenge Cup. Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | Talk 17:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Livescores

[edit]

Hi

Per WP:LIVESCORES we should not add scores to matches still in play. Please wait until match is finished and then add the score or your edit will be considered disrutive. This has also been discussed on WT:FOOTY many times. QED237 (talk) 19:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mercury
Japan national football team in 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dušan Tadić

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panama national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States national soccer team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ken Takakura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sakura, Minnade Tabeta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 J. League Division 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junya Tanaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 J3 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuki Sato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 J.League Cup

[edit]

Sorry,my deepest apologizes. For some reason I thought they only played 5 games!! I can't count!! Druryfire (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 J. League Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Koji Hashimoto and Junya Tanaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1996 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ** [[James Rouse]], American businessman and founder of [[The Rouse Company

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yuichi Nishimura article

[edit]

Hello, I'd like to discuss your revert of my edit on the page about Yuichi Nishimura. I agree with you that not all of the references lined up with the specific sentences, but my writing of the article itself was much clearer in plain English and avoided confusion. Could we maybe think about reducing the amount of sources on that particular section? There are five sources for the phrase about Neymar's yellow card alone - surely that is excessive. Also five sources on Nishimura receiving negative reviews when maybe two would suffice. Then it'll be easier to fix the problem you had with the page while addressing the rewrite I thought it needed. Savvy10 (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If so, please make all pre-existing references matched with the descriptions. I noticed that you relocated some descriptions to the different position, while leaving the references unmoved, thus creating the mismatches which could not be left unfixed.---What can I do for someone?- (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And you couldn't have moved the references yourself? Instead you just reverted a constructive edit? Lazy. Savvy10 (talk) 01:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Emperor's Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yoshiki Takahashi and Hiroaki Okuno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Emperor's Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yuki Sato and Kazuhisa Kawahara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 J. League Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroyuki Abe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it is not necessary

[edit]

yes it is not necessary thank — Preceding unsigned comment added by 李建兴 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 April

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, WCIDFS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, WCIDFS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb team Uva b

[edit]

Template:Fb team Uva b has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japan national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Nishino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, WCIDFS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Junichi Inamoto, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official statement about his transfer available in English, but all in Japanese language as of now (cannot expect anything in English to be released from 3rd-tier J-league clubs..). The only available English one I found is this.—-What can I do for someone?- (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sponsored sports venues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akita. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sponsored sports venues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mito.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Message

[edit]

is on Talk:Assassination_of_Shinzo_Abe#Proposal_to_add_Queen_Elizabeth_II's_reaction Venkat TL (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Hanae Mori

[edit]

On 25 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hanae Mori, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 World Baseball Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miyazaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 55go. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Takanori Iwata, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --55go (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Emperor's Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WCIDFS&oldid=1258276499"