User talk:Vivvt/Archives/2014
• This user is overloaded in real life (and busy!) and may not be active as earlier and only reverting vandalism for now. |
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vivvt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
Lazy
I saw that removal of award list but was very lazy to search and add all references. Welcome to the lazy-editor's club. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Dadasaheb Phalke Award
Hi, a week ago it was "rumored" that Jeetendra will be presented with the award. It's a good news that Gulzar would be honoured! BTW, this year why there is a delay in announcing the awards? —Vensatry (Ping) 15:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Glad he didn't get it!! Also, with more than 550 entries received this year, I assume it must have been a difficult and time-consuming process for the juries to finalize the winners. It should be announced next week, I believe. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- True, it must be a joke! —Vensatry (Ping) 19:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I have nominated Gulzar for front page ITN section and on Wikipedia: ITN/C people supported it but there are urgent need of improvements to make it appear on front page. Issues are discussed on Wikipedia: ITN/C#April 12, please help. Regards, -Nizil (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. As my talk page mentions in the header, I am not much active these days. With career spanning over 60 years for such prolific personality, the article needs a lot of work and I am afraid, I would not be able to provide that much time for now. Sorry and Good luck! - Vivvt (Talk) 02:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I have nominated Gulzar for front page ITN section and on Wikipedia: ITN/C people supported it but there are urgent need of improvements to make it appear on front page. Issues are discussed on Wikipedia: ITN/C#April 12, please help. Regards, -Nizil (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
National Film Award for Best Feature Film in Malayalam
What does the parameter "Total awarded" in the Infobox of this article mean? I changed it from 61 to 62 after this year's awards were announced. But you again changed it to 66. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- It means how many films have been awarded so far. The count was incorrect as some of the certificate awarded movies were not counted. I corrected that one. - Vivvt (Talk) 15:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 08:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
KRIMUK90 ✉ 08:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Stop being silly
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
In response to this edit, where should this hook find a place? —Vensatry (Ping) 09:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: already added that on
thishis user page. I must say he is very generous, if you haven't noticed so far. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)- But I cannot find that in the page. " I must say he is very generous" Oh really? Then what about you? —Vensatry (Ping) 14:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Its there on the page. For any further assistance, contact @Dharmadhyaksha:. About me, well..How to Name It? - Vivvt (Talk) 15:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nope, it isn't there. By "How to Name It", is it an indirect clue that you're a musician or a saint like Tyagaraja? —Vensatry (Ping) 15:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you are really interested in knowing anything about me. Are you? - Vivvt (Talk) 15:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm looking for that "one single word" that could best define what kinda person you are. —Vensatry (Ping) 17:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Post it here once your search is finished! - Vivvt (Talk) 17:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- No, I want that word to come from your mouth since you were describing about the nature of your good friend! —Vensatry (Ping) 17:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, could you tell me where is the page containing that link? —Vensatry (Ping) 17:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't speak about myself. For any further assistance, contact @Dharmadhyaksha: - Vivvt (Talk) 17:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, could you tell me where is the page containing that link? —Vensatry (Ping) 17:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- No, I want that word to come from your mouth since you were describing about the nature of your good friend! —Vensatry (Ping) 17:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Post it here once your search is finished! - Vivvt (Talk) 17:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm looking for that "one single word" that could best define what kinda person you are. —Vensatry (Ping) 17:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you are really interested in knowing anything about me. Are you? - Vivvt (Talk) 15:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nope, it isn't there. By "How to Name It", is it an indirect clue that you're a musician or a saint like Tyagaraja? —Vensatry (Ping) 15:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Its there on the page. For any further assistance, contact @Dharmadhyaksha:. About me, well..How to Name It? - Vivvt (Talk) 15:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- But I cannot find that in the page. " I must say he is very generous" Oh really? Then what about you? —Vensatry (Ping) 14:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- This is not a fight where one stands for themselves. All your above messages indicates that you need an "assistance" finding the link. On the other hand, as you consider yourself a better editor (I don't know, you might be (read "who cares!!")), you might also be aware of the fact that the last line of your above message may fall under Wikipedia:No personal attacks.
- I am awstruck when you make a comment about being "better human being" than others when you don't even a clue about their personal life...and that's called "being childish". - Vivvt (Talk) 18:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- My comments about being human was made with no reference to any of your personal lives, rather I was referring to your on-wiki behaviour, which I'm really frustrated about. And further, criticizing others based on personal opinions is just too ridiculous (it's not that I'm getting paid for every single edit that I make here). I'm really wondering how people like you could make fun of others (contributions made by them) and when someone prompts for an explanation, you term them "childish". If you feel that my comments fall under WP:PA, go file an ANI! —Vensatry (Ping) 18:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you are frustrated with others, don't deal with them. As simple as that. I don't know you so I don't care. Again, as simple as that.
- I wonder what makes you pass a comments like "how people like you". I am damn sure you don't know me. - Vivvt (Talk) 18:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you make fun of somebody you have no rights to stop them from demanding an explanation from you. "I don't know you so I don't care" nice to hear this, but can you criticize their work that too with in Wikipedia. I don't know how fair is this when you don't know many of them even as Wikipedians. As for "people like you", again no connections are to be made with real-life. I was only talking about the on-wiki behaviour. —Vensatry (Ping) 18:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know anybody and wish not to know as well. However, I've enjoyed this whole communication so far, so keep coming! - Vivvt (Talk) 19:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, you think you're so sarcastic? Even an insane would say NO! Glad that you enjoyed the conversation. But I must say that I got some constructive work to do at least from now on. You continue your good work harassing others. Cheers! —Vensatry (Ping) 05:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- "so keep coming", I'm flattered! I love conversing with two kinds of people – intellectuals and the opposite! (you're no intellectual). Yet, I'm pleased with your last comment, so I shall keep coming as long as we want. —Vensatry (Ping) 05:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- "you're no intellectual" Yet another time. You don't know me so you cannot say! It's really amusing that you don't understand a very simple point that....."you don't know me" and "need not" as well. - Vivvt (Talk) 06:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have repeatedly said that, I'm talking only about your on-wiki behaviour and not real-life. Inspite of that you continue to say that I'm hinting at your personal life. Once again you proved that you're an intellect! (oh sorry the opposite of it). —Vensatry (Ping) 06:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- "you're no intellectual" Yet another time. You don't know me so you cannot say! It's really amusing that you don't understand a very simple point that....."you don't know me" and "need not" as well. - Vivvt (Talk) 06:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- "so keep coming", I'm flattered! I love conversing with two kinds of people – intellectuals and the opposite! (you're no intellectual). Yet, I'm pleased with your last comment, so I shall keep coming as long as we want. —Vensatry (Ping) 05:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, you think you're so sarcastic? Even an insane would say NO! Glad that you enjoyed the conversation. But I must say that I got some constructive work to do at least from now on. You continue your good work harassing others. Cheers! —Vensatry (Ping) 05:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know anybody and wish not to know as well. However, I've enjoyed this whole communication so far, so keep coming! - Vivvt (Talk) 19:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you make fun of somebody you have no rights to stop them from demanding an explanation from you. "I don't know you so I don't care" nice to hear this, but can you criticize their work that too with in Wikipedia. I don't know how fair is this when you don't know many of them even as Wikipedians. As for "people like you", again no connections are to be made with real-life. I was only talking about the on-wiki behaviour. —Vensatry (Ping) 18:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- My comments about being human was made with no reference to any of your personal lives, rather I was referring to your on-wiki behaviour, which I'm really frustrated about. And further, criticizing others based on personal opinions is just too ridiculous (it's not that I'm getting paid for every single edit that I make here). I'm really wondering how people like you could make fun of others (contributions made by them) and when someone prompts for an explanation, you term them "childish". If you feel that my comments fall under WP:PA, go file an ANI! —Vensatry (Ping) 18:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just came in here to say that i received your notifications. But am not understanding a thing over here and hence can't comment. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Of course I know you as a Wikipedian and "your on-wiki behaviour"! It's because of that I'm commenting here. And, I don't care who you are in real life. —Vensatry (Ping) 08:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- You are behaving like Rahul Gandhi in Arnab Goswami's interview. Be original. When both of us are not interested in dealing with you, you shamelessly come back with the same stuff! Come back and prove our point. :D - Vivvt (Talk) 11:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, why do you respond then? If you read my first post, things would be clearer; it only shows your inability of understanding things in a better way. And don't behave like a prat by making misleading comparisons. :) —Vensatry (Ping) 15:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Point proven. :D. Rahul Gandhi in making! Hahaha - Vivvt (Talk) 15:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know if you've come across this short story Nandavanathil Oru Aandi. You are one such Aandi! —Vensatry (Ping) 16:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah...Very hilarious story. Still, you have become a fierce competition to Gandhi but don't try to take his position in a day, else you will be like Kejriwal, trying to solve all the problems in one go. Life is not like shown in Mudhalvan...play calm...You have the potential (I know...I know :D). To re-verify you potential, you may think of replying again on my talk page. I'm lovin' it - Vivvt (Talk) 17:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, why is that you are so very obsessed with men? (you seem to be very happy after each time you mentioned Rahul's name). Don't drag them here atleast. BTW, do you know me personally? Making comments about my potential ("whatever" you might be referring to, I'm not sure) doesn't make any sense (your "style" of answering). And, yes as someone who started this discussion, I will be more interested in finishing this than you. (Ha, someone has stated that he's very busy and is spending more time in replying me). —Vensatry (Ping) 18:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- "obsessed with men"...Hahaha...May be your ability to infer anything is very inferior!! Do you read my replies at all or every day is a fresh day for you like for Drew Barrymore's character in 50 First Dates? You may be like Kejriwal. Only talk but no action. If you had to end this whole conversation, you would have done it long back. Like DD did in one shot. I must say he is very straightforward, if you haven't noticed so far. - Vivvt (Talk) 18:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, why is that you are so very obsessed with men? (you seem to be very happy after each time you mentioned Rahul's name). Don't drag them here atleast. BTW, do you know me personally? Making comments about my potential ("whatever" you might be referring to, I'm not sure) doesn't make any sense (your "style" of answering). And, yes as someone who started this discussion, I will be more interested in finishing this than you. (Ha, someone has stated that he's very busy and is spending more time in replying me). —Vensatry (Ping) 18:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah...Very hilarious story. Still, you have become a fierce competition to Gandhi but don't try to take his position in a day, else you will be like Kejriwal, trying to solve all the problems in one go. Life is not like shown in Mudhalvan...play calm...You have the potential (I know...I know :D). To re-verify you potential, you may think of replying again on my talk page. I'm lovin' it - Vivvt (Talk) 17:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know if you've come across this short story Nandavanathil Oru Aandi. You are one such Aandi! —Vensatry (Ping) 16:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Point proven. :D. Rahul Gandhi in making! Hahaha - Vivvt (Talk) 15:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, why do you respond then? If you read my first post, things would be clearer; it only shows your inability of understanding things in a better way. And don't behave like a prat by making misleading comparisons. :) —Vensatry (Ping) 15:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- You are behaving like Rahul Gandhi in Arnab Goswami's interview. Be original. When both of us are not interested in dealing with you, you shamelessly come back with the same stuff! Come back and prove our point. :D - Vivvt (Talk) 11:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- @Dharmadhyaksha: It's because of this user's intervention (over Anuradha Ramanan's DYK hook) in your sandbox, I'm commenting here. I strongly feel that it's reasonable to ask him too since he was the one who pointed out me indirectly in the article's talk page. So let him answer! —Vensatry (Ping) 07:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- My first response itself gives you your answer. I have also told umpteen times that I am not interested in dealing with you. I am not answering any of your questions. If you still haven't understood anything said above...what this video - Vivvt (Talk) 15:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
National film award records - content dispute
if u have content dispute, please explain why u have reverted. Adurthi subba rao 6 National film award (director) best telugu film is wrong or you have any trouble or personal opinion on listing Mr. Subba rao in the record list. dont just revert without explanation, as some in experienced editors do. This is a content dispute, if u have a problem with something, u have to explain it, it is your responsibility.Mathsraja (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- You cannot list director for regional award under director award...either put it under different regional heading or dont put it at all (which I would prefer) - Vivvt (Talk) 02:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
regional
so I have listed in a different category, thanx, Mathsraja (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks much. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
ITN credit
On 4 May 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gulzar, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
ThaddeusB (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Congratulations to you too. :) -Nizil (talk) 08:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
question
Busy these days? Want to work on Aparajito?--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Kind of. That's why working on only one article at a time. Currently working on Bharat Ratna but I think I should be done with it by end of this week. I am definitely ready to work on any of the Ray articles. Let me start gathering the sources. Also, need to watch the movie again. - Vivvt (Talk) 22:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the article is in rudimentary stage. Please gather sources, and start writing. We can in general follow the pattern as used in Pather Panchali, with changes as appropriate. Do you read/understand Bengali? --Dwaipayan (talk) 20:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good. No. I don't read/understand Bengali. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the article is in rudimentary stage. Please gather sources, and start writing. We can in general follow the pattern as used in Pather Panchali, with changes as appropriate. Do you read/understand Bengali? --Dwaipayan (talk) 20:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Are you sure the Saibal Chattopadhyay of this article co-authored the Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema? I doubt so. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Corrected. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vénus de Quinipily
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vénus de Quinipily you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I though that you might want more photos of this statue, so... ;)
XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 15:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks for your help. :) - Vivvt (Talk) 15:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Before the irritating GA bot clicks in again, permit me to add my own personal congratulations on the promotion of this fine article. I enjoyed it greatly and learnt a lot. Tim riley talk 20:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I appreciate your time to review the article. :) - Vivvt (Talk) 20:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vénus de Quinipily
The article Vénus de Quinipily you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vénus de Quinipily for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Vénus de Quinipily
On 5 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vénus de Quinipily, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the 17th century many couples performed "erotic" acts near The Iron Lady (pictured), and it was thrown into the river twice for being an object of pagan veneration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vénus de Quinipily. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your Iron Lady should have gone on main page with one of the newly uploaded better images. Lets change that image from article as well when the hook is off the main page. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Alright. Feel free to change to the one you prefer. Also, I think the efforts were well paid with GA and whopping 14000+ DYK hits for the article. - Vivvt (Talk) 01:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done with image change and congrats for the hit count. Now, how and when and who adds it to Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Statistics#June_2014? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I thought you would select File:Vénus de Quinipily 8636.JPG. Btw, not sure who adds it to the stats page. It could be admin else I thought I would wait for a while and just be bold and add it myself. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done with image change and congrats for the hit count. Now, how and when and who adds it to Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Statistics#June_2014? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Alright. Feel free to change to the one you prefer. Also, I think the efforts were well paid with GA and whopping 14000+ DYK hits for the article. - Vivvt (Talk) 01:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your Iron Lady should have gone on main page with one of the newly uploaded better images. Lets change that image from article as well when the hook is off the main page. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Phalke
Yes, I wanted to as well. Give me a couple of days.—indopug (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of H. S. Rawail
Hello! Your submission of H. S. Rawail at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skr15081997 (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for H. S. Rawail
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article H. S. Rawail, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/H. S. Rawail. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Rahul Rawail
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rahul Rawail, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Sunghursh
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sunghursh, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Jeevan Ek Sanghursh
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeevan Ek Sanghursh, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Best dialogue nominee
"Jaha par ugta hai whahan se bikta nahi". LOLZ!!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Haha...Very cruel. :D - Vivvt (Talk) 13:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Resilient Barnstar | |
For going to an extraordinary effort to improve Dadasaheb Phalke Award during the FLC and sticking with it until you succeeded. I'm very impressed! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC) |
- Yup, many congratulations! :) :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Kaaviya Thalaivan
Please tell me about the other Kaaviya Thalaivan film that exists. Then I may consider your moving of the page valid. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for the barnstar :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Ceremony year / Filmfare Awards South
If that is the case please have a look on {{Filmfare Awards}}
and change accordingly if needed {{Filmfare Awards South}}
Hari (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- That's correct. That should also be changed. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Hariehkr: Done. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bharat Ratna
Hi, I took up your request for a copy edit for this article and have completed it. Could you check that the context is correct? Thanks Blackmane (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Blackmane: Thanks much for your efforts. I reverified and the context is appropriate. Thanks again. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll mark the request as done at WP:GOCE. Blackmane (talk) 14:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Wrath
I am seeing various Nobel prize lists (e.g. Females, Lit, Eco, WUSTL and more...) which have quotes under citation/rationale column. So can you remind me of which Gods of Copyrights were offended when such quotes were used in NFA lists? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:49, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- I had raised this point earlier but lost interest when got to know that citations are considered as "floral" and role played adds values to the list! - Vivvt (Talk) 09:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Naah! They didn't call it floral. They used another floral word for that. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Lingaa
I need your help. Please cleanup the page Lingaa and remove some exisiting trivia. I have done some put the page still has it.
- Added to the watchlist. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kaksparsh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dwaipayanc -- Dwaipayanc (talk) 03:41, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bharat Ratna
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bharat Ratna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmritasyaPutra -- AmritasyaPutra (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I have left a message for you on the review page. Thanks! --AmritasyaPutraT 07:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Kaksparsh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kaksparsh for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dwaipayanc -- Dwaipayanc (talk) 20:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
For bringing Kaksparsh to GA status! And I believe it is the first GA on a Marathi film. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you. Yes...This is the first GA on a Marathi film. Interestingly, Dwai also had reviewed first GA on a Malayalam film Swayamvaram for me. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- That's great. Ya, I forgot about Swayamvaram. It read like a realy good film. When I first read Kaksparsh I mis-read parts of the plot, and thought the widow is actually the widow of the son of the Hari Damle. And was quite excited to see such a plot in which Damle marries the widow of his son -- quite radical! But later saw she was the widow of his brother. In any case, not a bad story.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bharat Ratna
The article Bharat Ratna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bharat Ratna for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmritasyaPutra -- AmritasyaPutra (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Your reversion of my edits to "Kaaviya Thalaivan"
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edits to Kaaviya Thalaivan. These edits were in accordance with the MOS/Disambiguation pages, specifically WP:DABPIPING. Would you please be so kind as to revert your reversion?—DocWatson42 (talk) 08:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- @DocWatson42: Done. Thanks and apologies. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! ^_^ —DocWatson42 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Swayamvaram
Just happened to come across this Bengali article on Swayamvaram, written by Gopalkrishnan himself. It has some trivia. I don't know if there are softwares to translate this article in English, for your reading.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks much. I will have to see if there is any online help available. Let me see how that goes. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Bharat Ratna
On 8 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bharat Ratna, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 2013, the Bharat Ratna – India's highest civilian award – was conferred on Sachin Tendulkar, the youngest recipient and first sportsperson to receive the honour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bharat Ratna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |