User talk:Vaulter/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vaulter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Welcome!
|
- Thank you. And thanks for making the edit I requested. Hot Stop (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Queen_Elizabeth_II%27s_visit_to_the_Republic_of_Ireland&diff=429612071&oldid=429611973 --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well seeing that you deleted my comment, let's say we're even. Hot Stop (c) 04:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Please be reminded that per WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES, the article Queen Elizabeth II's visit to the Republic of Ireland is under a 1RR restriction, which you have already broken (first revert 0316 yesterday, second 0255 today). Please don't revert further and discuss the issue on the talk page. StrPby (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry chief. Hot Stop (c) 03:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Use of Euro on ITN
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi!
Hi. In doing this I am following current guidelines. And the current discussion is supporting current guidelines. --Againme (talk) 21:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'll answer this at ANI to keep things in one place. Hot Stop (t) 21:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Please don't undo my removal of a clearly unreliable blog source. It would definitely be a candidate for MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. Wknight94 talk 19:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Can you explain why you think it fails RS? The only explanation you gave is bleacherbumsports.net hardly sounds like a reliable source Hot Stop talk-contribs 19:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- "Were (sic) just a collection of 20-somethings writing about sports. Read our writing, and comment on it, im (sic) sure we will be more than happy to respond." Does that seriously strike you as a reliable source? They don't even have a copy editor, let alone fact checking. Please read WP:RS and WP:BLOGS before pursuing this further. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 03:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- LOL. I should've checked that first. Thanks. Hot Stop talk-contribs 04:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- "Were (sic) just a collection of 20-somethings writing about sports. Read our writing, and comment on it, im (sic) sure we will be more than happy to respond." Does that seriously strike you as a reliable source? They don't even have a copy editor, let alone fact checking. Please read WP:RS and WP:BLOGS before pursuing this further. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 03:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
2011
For example, this edit comment, in addition to being a lie, would not be appropriate even if correct. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether he's a troll on ITN, his actions in 2011 are perfectly in keeping with WP:RY and WP:YEARS. You should be more careful when straying into projects where you are not familiar with the guidelines. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- OWN much? Also that events totally meets three continents rule. That discussion wreaks of IDONTLIKEIT. Plus, Irene should at least be on there. That's why this project is fucked, people with agendas can't be stopped. Hot Stop talk-contribs 13:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- I see you don't understand WP:RY. Perhaps you can suggest a clarification. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- OWN much? Also that events totally meets three continents rule. That discussion wreaks of IDONTLIKEIT. Plus, Irene should at least be on there. That's why this project is fucked, people with agendas can't be stopped. Hot Stop talk-contribs 13:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Civility
Comments like this are not welcome on Wikipedia. Please review WP:CIVILITY. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I see someone beat me to it. I must say I was tempted to remove your !vote outright because it's inflammatory though the target wasn't specific. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
DYK for George Godsey
 | On 24 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Godsey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that New England Patriots assistant George Godsey is the most accurate quarterback in Georgia Tech history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Godsey.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Biography categories
Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:27, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
This edit summary was way out of line. The edit warring is also going to land you and Whatsthatcomingoverthehill in hot water unless you knock it off, but I couldn't let that edit summary slide. Please walk away from this dispute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
Messing with MY post at ITN/Candidates
The whole point I have been making in that thread is about the fact that the thread title said "Iraq War ends", then Swarm said "No one's referring to this announcement as the end of the war". Since this stupidly contradicted the whole point of what I had been saying, I have every right to highlight how idiotic a comment it was. Please don't change my post again. HiLo48 (talk) 05:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Please stick to standard style used elsewhere on this site. Do you see Big text on WP:ANI or anywhere else? Hot Stop talk-contribs 05:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do wish you were capable of giving reasons, rather than just orders. I don't respond well to such behaviour. I gave reasons. HiLo48 (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
- I've blocked you for 12 hours due to your personal attacks; learn to behave civilly, or the next one will be a lot longer. Ironholds (talk) 02:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Vaulter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No offense but SudoGhost (talk · contribs) inflamed the situation. This warning was completely unneeded as I had already provided the sourcing he asked for. Hot Stop talk-contribs 02:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There may be some places on the internet where it is considered acceptable to call people "twatface", and to tell people to "fuck off" because they give a civil warning which you think was "unneeded", but Wikipedia is not one of them. I also suggest that you try reading WP:NOTTHEM. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- And in response, you instructed him to "fuck off" and "go do something productive", having previously instructed a user that they "[en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&diff=prev&oldid=456931954 look like a child when [they] fuck with the font" - but it's okay, because somebody left you an unneeded warning message? Ironholds (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Was there a point of leaving the message? Hot Stop talk-contribs 03:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps not, but are you quite sure that was the best way to handle the situation? Your current tone suggests to me that you'll launch into more vitriolic attacks the next time something doesn't go your way, which doesn't exactly inspire confidence that you understand or care why you were blocked. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Was there a point of leaving the message? Hot Stop talk-contribs 03:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Thanks
Thanks for clarifying the heading in James I proposed compromise. I'm not the best in editing these more involved situations. Mugginsx (talk) 16:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Do you think you should close the first move you requested so people can focus on the second one? Hot Stop talk-contribs 17:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again for finding the lost signator! Mugginsx (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
(forgot if I did it this time or last - apologizes if it is twice (smile). Mugginsx (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Mugginsx (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Hot Stop talk-contribs 21:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Good Advice
Sometimes my better judgment goes out the window. Thank you for being patient and giving good advice! Mugginsx (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November 2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Not important?
It's rather unusual for an NHL player to let loose with such damning words for another. I feel this merits inclusion. What's your take? Vranak (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Personally I feel like since he wasn't suspended or fined for it, it's not really worthy of inclusion. Hot Stop talk-contribs 17:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. Anyway, I opened a discussion at his talk page for third opinions. Vranak (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I commented there. Hot Stop talk-contribs 18:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. Anyway, I opened a discussion at his talk page for third opinions. Vranak (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
ArbCom
You have a really interesting platform. Good luck! Jenks24 (talk) 06:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Agree. If you're serious, then your answers to questions are going to be very important. Pay attention to them! --regentspark (comment) 14:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom election 2011
Dear Hot Stop, thank you for nominating yourself as a candidate in the 2011 Arbitration Committee elections. On behalf of the coordinators, allow me to welcome you to the elections and make a few suggestions to help you get set up. By now, you ought to have written your nomination statement, which should be no more than 400 words. Although there are no fixed guidelines for how to write a statement, note that many candidates treat this as an opportunity, in their own way, to put a cogent case as to why editors should vote for them—highlighting the strengths they would bring to the job, and convincing the community they would cope with the workload and responsibilities of being an arbitrator.
In order for your candidacy to be valid, your nomination statement must also include a declaration of any alternate or former user accounts you have contributed under (or, in the case of privacy concerns, a declaration that you have disclosed them to the Arbitration Committee), and must express your willingness and ability to meet the Wikimedia Foundation's access to nonpublic data policy.
You should at this point have your own questions subpage; feel free to begin answering the questions as you please. Together, the nomination statement and questions subpage should be transcluded to your candidate profile, whose talkpage will serve as the central location for discussion of your candidacy. If you experience any difficulty setting up these pages, please follow the links in the footer below. If you need assistance, on this or any other matter (including objectionable questions or commentary by others on your candidate pages), please notify the coordinators at their talkpage. If you have followed these instructions correctly, congratulations, you are now officially a candidate for the Arbitration Committee. Good luck! Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 | Arbitration Committee Election 2011 candidate: Hot Stop
|
- Can you please look over your row on the table on the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2011/Candidates/Guide page? Feel free to correct any mistakes or to fill in any missing information. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Everything appears correct. Thank you. Hot Stop talk-contribs 16:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Just FYI, it is the Wikimedia Foundation (not the committee) to whom you are expected to identify. –xenotalk 19:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Concerning the Arbitration Committee Elections
Hot Stop,
As a candidate for the Arbitration Committee elections, please be aware that your name has been entered into the SecurePoll ballot and can no longer be removed barring the most dire of emergencies and direct manipulation of the database. While you may still withdraw from the election, your name will not be removed from the ballot, but only struck through. If you have any further questions on the process, feel free to contact myself, the other election administrators, or the election coordinators. --Tznkai (talk), 2011 Arbitration Committee Election Administrator. 21:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Please take a look at this article. It includes information you deleted as unsourced from American English. I tagged it as A10, duplicating an existing article. It does cover the same subject, but includes some detail not in that other article. Do you think the new article should be deleted, merged, or what? Thanks. Edison (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I'm not an admin, so I can't view the American Accents page, but I'd assume you meant this stuff. It seems like interesting stuff but I think it'd be better off being incorporated into the American English page. I'm not much of an expert on the topic though, I only removed the stuff because there was no source. Hot Stop talk-contribs 03:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Yoghurt
Revert my close of Yoghurt again and unless there is a clear consensus that my administrative close was inappropriate at the ANI I will take administrative action against you. -- PBS (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
Jimmy Wales
Please view the talk page.
Folgertat (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
I voted for ya.
Also, I'm a little surprised to see the overwhelming number of negative votes. Oh well. -Kai445 (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the vote (I'd love to see who else supported be, but that seems unlikely). I wasn't too surprised I did so poorly given all trash people said about me in the so-called guides. Hot Stop talk-contribs 06:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Constitution of Massachusetts
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edit to the article about the constitution of Massachusetts; however, I don't understand why, as it was factually accurate. It is not the oldest still functioning constitution in the world, the one of San Marino is, and this is widely documented. Raskssinger (talk) 23:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not really. I don't have the time at the moment but there are sources that dispute San Marino's claim because it's not a single "constitution" (akin to the UK's). Hot Stop UTC 14:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
Hi
You wouldn't be able to call him King William as he may nit succeed to the throne.--Thanks Chip123456. (talk) 16:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)