User talk:Valentia Nesterova

Welcome!

Hello, Valentia Nesterova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kenneth G. Eade, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth G. Eade

The article Kenneth G. Eade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet inclusion standards for a person. No sources about the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a ton of sources from news articles and other independent reliable sources on this author. There should be enough notability not to delete the article. Valentina Nesterova

Kenneth G. Eade article

I added a ton of sources from news articles and other independent reliable sources on this author. There should be enough notability not to delete the article.

Nomination of Kenneth G. Eade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth G. Eade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth G. Eade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in the A Patriot's Act article

Hello, Valentia Nesterova. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

However, in patrolling your recently-created article A Patriot's Act, I discovered that the plot summary section had been copied word-for-word from the Amazon.com page for the book. Copyright violation is a very serious matter on Wikipedia. Most editors would have either deleted that section, or nominated the entire article for speedy deletion. I have rewritten the section in my own words (though other editors may consider the result to still be too closely paraphrased) to resolve that issue. However, it's important that you understand what the problem with such copying is so that you do not make the same mistake again. I'm sure you don't enjoy having an article you put together facing deletion.

Thank you again for your contributions. I know Wikipedia has many policies and guidelines to follow and it's hard to learn all of them at once. Speaking of which, you may not be aware of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, which states, among other things, that editors who are closely connected with the subject of an article they work on must disclose their conflict of interest on their user page. This applies to you if you know Mr. Eade personally, as your username suggests you might. —GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 10:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Unreasonable Force

The article Unreasonable Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Killer.com

The article Killer.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources for book self-published on CreateSpace

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]