User talk:Ud terrorist

Sirhan Sirhan, Jerome K. Jerome, Freeman Freeman-Thomas, Boutros Boutros-Ghali

Hi Ud terrorist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 19:32, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

GameTalk

This article was deleted because it didn't survive a deletion debate earlier. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:06, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

It's not that the article is badly written or anything, but the deletion debate resulted in a delete because people thought the article was vanity meaning it's not particularly important or noteworthy. Of course, this is a subjective thing, but you might want to go to the new deletion debate I linked to, to convice people of it's importance. At least vfd is better than having it outright speedied. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:17, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler

Your edit to Adolf Hitler was on the edge of vandalism and I reverted it as vandalism. Please be more thoughtful in the future and don't edit Wikipedia to make a point, thanks. Wyss 17:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, your edits to Adolf Hitler are so frivolous and unencyclopedic as to nudge the line of vandalism on this very controversial article. I ask you to be thoughtful and respectful for the careful work of others. Thanks! Wyss 21:12, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Waffen SS

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 18:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Mindspillage

I just thought you would like to know this edit shows an anon voting in your name. I am almost certain that the edit was made by an imposter, the IP address is very similar to others where malicious edits have come from recently, but if it was not you will need to re-add your vote (remembering to sign in, of course). Rje 19:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Agram2000suppressed.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Agram2000suppressed.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 07:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Duketime.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duketime.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image copyright problem with Image:Smartgirl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Smartgirl.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 20:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prussian Blue (American duo)

Lamb, Lynx and their mother April also appeared in a low-budget 2003 horror called Dark Walker[1]

Where did you find this info, besides IMDB? Thanks. --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 21:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found it. Thanks. --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 21:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability needed

A tag has been placed on your article Anjali Kara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Anjali Kara is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Anjali Kara. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Powell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Powell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Croker-Poole to be merged into Princess Salima Aga Khan

It has been suggested that the Sarah Croker-Poole article be merged into Princess Salima Aga Khan. As an editor of the article, you are invited to discuss. -- Aylahs ^(talk) 16:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silverballer

Did you redirect the Silverballer article to the one about the Hardballer? I just searched for Silverballer only to be redirected there, yet I understood that they were two completely different guns, one of them being entirely fictional?

The article also doesn't mention Hitman Codename 47 (the reason I search for the Siverballer), so a bit confusing.

Pablo180 00:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TNO Entertainment

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article TNO Entertainment, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Alvestrand 06:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Epbadge2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Epbadge2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Epbadge.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Epbadge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Epbadge2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Epbadge2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Epbadge.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Epbadge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fuckingusa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fuckingusa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion – Talk:Eric Robert Rudolph

This is a friendly notice that a discussion is underway here regarding a topic in which you have previously expressed interest. You are invited to participate in this discussion in order to improve it. I apologize if you did not wish to receive such notices. Groupthink (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ud terrorist! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Rahim Aga Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jamie Reeves - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Armengol Ondo Nguema - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mountain of Fire and Miracles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mountain of Fire and Miracles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain of Fire and Miracles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]