Jump to content

User talk:Theroadislong/Archive 58

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60→Archive 65

What reliable sources can be added for an academic journal?

Hi Theroadislong

You have rejected my article titled 'Nature Environment and Pollution Technology' which is about an academic journal in the field of Environmental Science. You have stated the reason as it should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established.

As this article is about an academic journal i have added its inclusion in Scopus which is one of the notability factor in its field. What other independent sources do you expect for a scientific journal? Should i add some more references to other databases where it is included like the proquest, EBSCO, Index Copernicus etc. Or should i add references to its most cited articles? Please help me what kind of references do you expect for an academic journal. Regards

Apurva1410 (talk) 14:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Apurva1410 There is some help here Wikipedia:TXTBKS.Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

For helping at my request and to make Sheila Ford Hamp ready for mainspace ! ~ Amkgp 💬 17:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, Thank you for your comment. I have a question related to the notablity of a page to be created. I'm assigned to create a page for the former ambassador of Switzerland to China. Is it sufficiently notable for a wikipedia page? Thank you.

B.R. Yi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Media Yi (talk • contribs) 06:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

HiFives Platform Wikipedia Page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FeetRhythmic/sandbox I had submitted this article based on independent media websites such as Economic Times (India's number 1 financial newspaper), Bangalore Mirror (city publication of India's No 1 media house Times of India) and Hindu Businessline (one of the oldest newspapers in India) and other reputed corporate websites such as Red Herring . They no linkage with any other business including HiFives except for being a source of information. All the sources of information are independent and verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FeetRhythmic (talk • contribs) 07:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

FeetRhythmic Your draft was declined because it reads like an advertisement, articles need to be written in a neutral encyclopedic tone, please also read WP:REFB for help with correctly formatting your sources. Theroadislong (talk) 07:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

for rejecting

whats problem in it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrey2006 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft Draft:Shrey Shah was rejected because you are not notable in Wikipedia's terms. Wikipedia doesn’t encourage people writing autobiographies, if you are notable somebody unconnected with you will write one eventually, but most of us are not notable enough. Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ori Isaac

Hi there, I am trying to fix the Draft:Ori Isaac but i get no response and I dont know what to do... can you please help and direct me because I have done what was asked and also, Ori is for sure someone who deserves to be on wikipedia... please help! Newlywo (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Galerie Richard

Hello Theroadislong. I thought the list of artists at Galerie Richard valuable information that should be preserved. The list is on the gallery website here http://www.galerierichard.com/en_artists.php So if you dont mind, I will reinstate it and cite that page. Hope that is agreeable to you. Valueyou (talk) 07:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't agree. The article is already VERY poorly sourced and promotional, I don't see any value in having a long list of non notable artists sourced to their own website. Theroadislong (talk) 07:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
OK then. Valueyou (talk) 07:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hugh Victor Duke

Dear Theroadislong,

Re: Hugh Victor Duke 

                     Thank you for you and colleagues' comments about my article recently submitted to Wikipedia. Please can you kindly advise me what I should do now to  make the entry acceptable for publication online. I realize that it is probably too long and will happily shorten it, as you seem to suggest. But no one else in the world has this information, so it would be unfortunate if it fails to see the light of day for technical reasons which I am not that conversant with. I doubt that anyone else has the data and certainly not the photos to write such an informative account of this particular brave soldier, one of Britain's esteemed (no less than by the State and King George VI himself) war heroes of the 2nd World War.

With many best wishes,


Hugh


Hugh Loxdale

Hugh David Loxdale (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

The article should be limited to a summary of what independent sources have said about him. Wikipedia has no interest in what you or I know about a subject. If there are no published sources for the content, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, please also note that Wikipedia is not a venue for memorials, see WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hempress Sativa

Hi there,

I drafted the Wikipedia page for HEMPRESS SATIVA, which you have rejected as it does not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Whilst I agree that this is true of the YouTube pages which I've mentioned, any other references are from independent reliable websites, blogs, newspapers, so i'm not sure why they've been rejected. Are there particular ones which need to change?

Your guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBalticCount (talk • contribs) 14:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

TheBalticCount Your draft has been declined NOT rejected. You have used quite a few interviews which are not considered reliable, neither are most blogs. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, and the assorted videos don't contribute to any notability, the artist would need to pass the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN and it's not clear how they do yet? Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

review please

hello User:Theroadislong, Thank you, . Draft Meets the standards, and I have modified the references And she has enough sources. Draft rejected before adding sources to it. tour guide and actor in Egypt , Trusted sources , and have Fame And sources more than Ali Mansur for example. I hope you look again, and We want to accept articles, and Thank you very much. --Mohamed Omar 3 (talk) 07:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

S

Why wasn’t my article published Danz33y official (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Danz33y official Because it only consisted of a word that you made up and was not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Gaurav Tiwari

Please review my page Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 09:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC) I reviewed it and tagged it as a hoax the infobox and the draft article appear to be about two different people, and was clearly copied and pasted in part from another article. Theroadislong (talk) 09:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

George Cazenove draft page

Hi - thank you for your ongoing support with this page. Is the correct way to add my signature? Arganflu (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Thats correct. Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

George Cazenove draft page

Hi - I have removed all the words I think you wanted removed.

Please can you advise what you mean by not using external links?

Thank you so much for your help!

External links like these [1] [2] [3], [4], [5] do not belong in article space, they might be suitable for conversion to references though. Theroadislong (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. What I don't understand is that these links are evidence of the claims made in the wikipedia article. How else can I use them to prove the points made? Arganflu (talk) 14:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

You can make them references instead. Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. How do I do that please? Arganflu (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Message Kate Lord Brown

Hello - thank you for your message. I did not create the page, AmberMidas did. I have just made the correction you asked for, and removed the Daily Mail link. Please can the page be published now? Thank you. Katelordbrown (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Roman Retzbach

I did corrections after talk with my mentor: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:YvesMe/Roman_Retzbach YvesMe (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

You need to edit the actual article here Roman Retzbach adding reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 10:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

So I'm allowed to do corrections on the main site, please?! --YvesMe (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Thanks Theroadislong, so I will do! --YvesMe (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I changed it now also on the main page. Thanks The Road is long, Yves YvesMe (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your support and opinion The RoadisLong! YvesMe (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Theroadislong, can you get my mentor or suggest me someone to improve my work, please?!YvesMe (talk) 09:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

I've listed 4 non-fiction books demanded as recommanded. Is it now ok? Can you change your decision, opinion, ...not to delete please?! Can I ask you again to get my mentor? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roman_Retzbach --YvesMe (talk) 10:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

YvesMe Listing more books is not required, the article needs independent sources, as far as I can tell ALL the sources are primary at the moment, that is they are connected to him. Creating a new article is the most difficult task on Wikipedia, I would recommend editing existing articles for an extended period before trying again, to get a feel for how it works. It is not my decision to delete or not delete, that will be decided by an admin, when the WP:AFD is closed. Theroadislong (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, you are so right. Better start easier. YvesMe (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

So put an index lock on the side so that the deletion problem is solved.YvesMe (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry I have no idea what you are suggesting here YvesMe. Theroadislong (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

A German administrator explained me, that a protection is put on a draft or article, so it can't be seen in the public. YvesMe (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Indizierungssperre (Indexing lock) YvesMe (talk) 14:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC). So deletion can be avoid. YvesMe (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 02:36:05, 2 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Happybiography



Happybiography (talk) 02:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

"Digital Finance" article

Hello, Unfortunately, my article submission has been rejected. I just wanted to draw your attention that I have provided a reference to an independent article about Digital Finance and its invention of the new financial product, in the reliable source (Washington Business Journal). Though it was a paid subscription article. Probably that was the reason for the rejection as you could not see the content of this article? Could you please help me and advise how to fix that? Currently, I have only this single article fully devoted to Digital Finance and its innovative financial product. I also provided references to SEC website to confirm that Digital Finance was registered as one of the first digital assets investment advisors in the U.S. and filed its innovative product with SEC. Please help me to improve my article so I can resubmit it. Thank you in advance for your time!

Regards, Liliya LiliyaBulgakova (talk) 02:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

LiliyaBulgakova You have made it rather difficult for others by blanking your talk page, but your draft Draft:Digital Finance which you have also blanked was not rejected it was declined, if you can find in-depth coverage of the company in independent reliable sources, then that would be a help. Theroadislong (talk) 06:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Theroadislong, for your valuable input!

Hello Theroadislong! Oh dear, just NOW, as i am retyping and moving my message to you, i see it looks like you replied (below) already (so quickly!) to my message to you. I was moving my reply as it looked like it lumped itself (my fault i am sure) to the message about "Digital Finance" article, also today's date. Here's what i'd written to you: Thank you for your input on my Talk page. I have read the message about Wikipedia having a stringent image use policy. absolutely, i understand and of course this must be adhered to! The thing is, all four photographs uploaded onto the page Draft:Manfred 'Little' Konzett for Manfred 'Little' Konzett, ARE indeed owned by him, and he has given me 100% permission to use, upload, and describe them on Wikipedia in association with the article I am writing about this noteworthy recording engineer/producer in Austria and Liechtenstein, who has worked with high profile musicians (American, English, etc) for many years. I've just received further information and instructions from Rich Smith, telling me how to properly give credit for these photographs. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:Little_Big_Beat_Studios,_Eschen_Liechtenstein..jpg ? Thank you very kindly, Beth Wimmer (talk) 06:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

The copyright will reside with the photographer NOT the owner of the photographs. Theroadislong (talk) 06:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Beth Wimmer (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Beth Wimmer

Hello again Theroadislong, Also, regarding deleting this page: User:Beth Wimmer. forgive me, I think I'd 'created' this page when i was simply trying my hand at adding information and editing. If this page is speedily deleted, it does NOT mean that i can no longer contribute/edit other articles, does it? Thank you kindly. Beth Wimmer (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

No, it was deleted because the content was inappropriate, see WP:UPGOOD for advice. You can still edit. Theroadislong (talk) 07:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Balance (2013 book) xx

Heya honey just letting you know I've worked out how to fix bare urls and I think it's okay now?xx Take care x — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadelaineHS (talk • contribs) 12:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

About 'Shuvro'

I, Suborno Sabbir, really appreciate your concern about the standards of Wikipedia. I also respect the standards of this free encyclopedia. 'Shuvro' is a famous fictional created by Humayun Ahmed, a legendary novelist, dramatist, screenwriter, songwriter, scholar and lecturer. And please don't think that he is a non-important person as he's from Bangladesh, a very poor country. He was offered a fellowship in Theoretical Mechanics in just a session in North Dakota State University. He was a versatile genius. And one of his incredible creation is 'Shuvro' and it deserves its proper recognition. So, I humbly request you to kindly accept this article and later it will be fixed by me and millions of other fans of Humayun Ahmed's Shuvro, Thank You.

Looks like you have bypassed the articles for creation process and moved it to mainspace, but unless you add reliable sources it is likely to be deleted. Theroadislong (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Suborno Sabbir And as expected it has now been taken to WP:AFD. Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Theroadislong Please, do you mind undoing the edits you made yesterday on Unique Recording Studios Wikipedia page. The info you deleted was not created by me, my husband or any paid agents of our defunct studios. What is this puffery that you cite? You want to erase our entire legacy with a stroke of your edit wand? We ran a recording studios in Times Square for over 25 years, made hundreds of Gold and Platinum records. Many have received Grammy nominations and awards. In addition the Studios were nominated for a Mix Magazine Technical Excellence award in 1987. Many of of our former engineers have gone on to be world class leaders in the recording field, some winning Grammy Awards for engineering including Tom Lord Alge and Chris Lord Alge.

I am new on wikipedia and admit may have made mistakes, but I am willing to learn. But my learning should not be punishment against my studios. I am asking you to please restore the edits you have made. Joanne NathanJoanne.nathan (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

I didn't say that the content was added by you? The content was promotional and had no sources, ALL content on Wikipedia requires reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Just In case what happened to me when you left a reply at the help-desk happens also to you.

Here is my response to your reply at the help-desk:

Theroadislong, I'm so sorry. I didn't ignore your response; I'm just seeing it. Somehow, I missed the notification. I only got the notifications from the Teahouse, and using the suggestions from the Teahouse, I rewrote and shortened the article and left only 17 references from the most reliable sources. The new edition has already been submitted and now I saw this. What do I do now? Based on the Teahouse suggestions, the new edition is practically a stub. Maybe someday, if it scales AfC, other editors will add more information about Dr. Dobbs to the article. Thanks, I never knew you replied me. Thanks a bunch and no hard feelings. One love. HTML Serial Killer (talk) 16:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Theroadislong thanks a bunch for your suggestion. I appreciate it a lot. Be blessed. HTML Serial Killer (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Francis Robert Kelly

Thank you for your comment. I've looked at criteria for artists, and believe that Kelly created a substantial body of work, and his artworks are still being bought and sold today. He has work in many galleries and permanent collections around the world, including the Tate in London and the Ashmolean in Oxford. I've added to the section on his professional work to make this clearer. He wrote two books on art restoration, to which he made a significant contribution in Florence (as mentioned in the article). His work has appeared in significant exhibitions (eg the prestigious Royal Academy, London, several times). His work has also appeared in several books and exhibition catalogues, reflecting his involvement in many exhibitions. I hope this helps to clarify his notability - thank you  :-) CourtauldGill (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Denial of Dr. Margaret Paul's page

Hello. I am inquiring as to why you denied Dr. Margaret Paul's wikipedia page? I am trying to make some edits to the page and I'd like some pointers as to what I can do to get this page up and running.

Sincerely,

Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by M52grinnelly (talk • contribs) 03:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

As explained in the decline message articles require significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, your draft has zero secondary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 07:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Diana Guerrero-Maciá Feedback

Thank you! I went in and added citations for exhibitions, paring that list down significantly. I also moved mention of museum collections to the top. Alexmenocal (talk) 21:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Belated thanks for article revision.

Thank's so much, for the article revision and namespace change: Scott Yoo. All this work is crucial for us newcomers; best understanding, mechanics and methodology. --Sonojacker (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Newfoundland Travelling Theatre Company

Hi there, Thank you so much for responding to my article.

I'm a guest editor through Memorial University and the Newfoundland Quarterly and our aim this summer is to increase the Wikipedia knowledge of various Newfoundland and Labrador subject. I've overseeing theatre.

New to Wiki, I'm trying to sort out how to properly cite my sources and where to do so.

I just added some encyclopedic sources to this article to support the piece. I'm seeing however that many of these sources are quite old and I'm concerned that some of the artists and organizations in the past 25 years may face the challenge of having enough qualifiable citations. Articles and Reviews will be most abundant.

I'll also go back to our organizers to let them know that this may become a challenge as we progress in the work.

When you get a chance, have a look and see if I'm now going in the right direction. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks Ruth Lawrence — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuthieLawrence (talk • contribs) 13:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Cr Bruce Devereaux - rejected

Just wondering if I can have some idea the grounds this was rejected on. I'll note the reason I put this up is I am mentioned on another wikipedia page and I thought it would be good to link from there to information on me. In Australia, while not a celebrity, I am interviewed fairly regularly on radio and have appeared on various tv programs as a blogger of note and spoken at Qld Parliament House and been the guest of honour at a Gala event raising money for cancer research in Tasmania. I literally can't go shopping along the east coast of Australia without someone recognising me and wanting a chat - I know because was on the road with my family for eighteen months and it became something of a game picking out when someone started stalking us in a supermarket. I might not be a movie star, but I am a politician and respected social media influencer. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruce Devereaux (talk • contribs) 22:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft was deleted so I can no longer see the content, I rejected it so you clearly didn't meet the criteria at WP:GNG having an article accepted is not about how "famous" you are. Theroadislong (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Book of Genesis

Seeing the editor's comments on their talk page and their edit summaries when they delete warnings saying "Don't care", I've given them a NOTHERE block as they clearly don't care about our policies and show no evidence that will change. Doug Weller talk 09:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Ultrasonic algae control

Hello Theroadislong

My name is Chris and I am a private person with no paid or financial stake in promoting this topic. As mentioned in my profile I am a private user of this device / technology and it's a very useful harm free method have no algae in swimming ponds, etc.

Best regards Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by SB2BC (talk • contribs) 17:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Reasoning for undoing my addition

Hi,

I wanted to ask why you have reverted my addition to List of language self-study programs with the tags stating lack of notability and sources.

Regarding notability, I have specifically mentioned my intention to write a full article on the subject of my addition (which is now complete) - given Wikipedia's rather vague notability guidelines, I have created the article in bona fide that a sourced collaboration with and endorsement from the country and region's leading research and tertiary education institution is enough (though if it isn't, there isn't much I could do about it except for complaining about the guidelines' vagueness costing me a loss of a non-zero number of hours in editing time).

Regarding sources, I provide some secondary and some primary sources in the dedicated article linked above, as I thought I wouldn't be required to provide sources for the expansions of a list in which, as far as I'm aware, a lot of the listed items lack sources as well.

To summarise, I would appreciate a more transparent approach to speedy deletions and edit reversions, especially in cases such as this, when the article itself invites users to expand the list.

SeriousSamIAm (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Now you have created the article, it can be added to the list at List of language self-study programs but be advised that your sources, (blogs and press releases) are not suitable reliable sources for establishing notability. Theroadislong (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Rabbit Hole Distillery Draft Comments

Hi there. Just wanted to get clarification on your comment on the Rabbit Hole Distillery draft. You commented "just advertising" - how would you fix this piece so it does not come across as a form of advertising? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattBarlow92 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

The whole draft reads like a promotional magazine article, the tone is totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia, if you cannot see this then your conflict of interest is blinding you. Articles should only summarise, dispassionately and neutrally what [[WP:RS|reliable independent sources have said about a topic. Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your help!

Hi there, I wanted to thank you for doing a sample for me on Deidre Gillard-Rollings article. I'm part of an effort to get more NL artists on the wikipedia, especially women, but it's proving challenging without a formal how-to in creating articles. I'm holding off on any activity until I get it sorted out a bit better. I appreciate your politeness in your response. Thank you Ruth Lawrence — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuthieLawrence (talk • contribs) 18:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Need help on - Article for Dr. (Col.) V. P.Singh

This is a wiki page for my father who is a very well known poet of India, he served in the Indian Army for many years and pursued his passion for poetry and hindi literature in parallel. He is a doctor and has worked in two medical colleges after having left the army. He is an inspiration and helps drive a spirit of love and respect along with patriotism among the youth. I have added a link with a lot of newspaper cuttings over the years for his work. Can you tell me what other source do you need? Sadly indian poetry has not completely gone digital yet. Thank you in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrutisingh16 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Sources do not need to be online, a Google drive link is not suitable. Facebook is never a reliable source and YouTube rarely is, please also read WP:COI. Theroadislong (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Trade Tech

Hi there - thanks for the quick review of the article Tradetech. That was seconds after submission - you must be a speed reader ;-)

I think there might be some confusion - please allow me to clarify: I am aware that there is a company somewhere that uses the name Tradetech but this article has nothing (!) to do with them. It is about technology in trade finance which is a thing as you can see from the abundant references. It is in the vein of fintech, regtech, insure tech, ...

Tradetech as a business, as far as I can see, does something entirely different. They probably would even not like the use of the term in this context but as it has noting to do with them they should not be able to object. The WTO has coined the term and it is widely used.

So not sure why this was shot down?

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by NBE1066 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

My apologies I've added back the submit button for you, the WP:SOLUTIONS comment is still relevant though. Theroadislong (talk) 10:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Privacy1 review

Dear moderator, I am writing you the understand the reason why the page Privacy1 is being declined. We won the trademark and we have released our product to both Google and Amazon cloud as an official partner. There are concrete proof of credibility of our company and I have added the source of the external links to the company product listing in the official Google and AWS marketplace.

As for the notability of our company I am unsure which rule do we not meet. Is it the multiple coverage? Thank you for your time.

Your draft Draft:Privacy1 about your own company, has one source which is a press release, articles require multiple in-depth independent sources, you have none, so no evidence whatsoever of passing WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 10:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I have added two more sources from Google Cloud and Aws marketplace. Will they be accounted as reliable, secondary significant sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pan xuan (talk • contribs) 10:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Aaintagent page Alexandria Altman

I received your comments, thank you. This is a learning curve for me.

(Aaintagent (talk) 12:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC))

Erik Reel: draft article

I hope this finds you safe and well. You recently and kindly helped me already on a draft article on Erik Reel. I notice that you have experience working with art-related articles and information. Perhaps you could help me.

My biggest problem seems to be my inability to understand why this draft is not postable and why my citations are not considered "reliable". Everything in this article is correct. That I am certain of. I've only been writing about artists whose shows I've witnessed for decades and have a lot of information on. Not all of it usable in a Wikipedia article of course. As for references in the art world, especially for artists working outside academia as many of the best do, what could be more reliable than catalogs published by museums and universities on exhibitions at those museums? Or a book on the artist? If we have to wait for a full biography for living artists before we can write about these artists (as opposed to about their art) then we're in trouble: for example, Cy Twombly is one of the best painters in the last century, but a biography just came out for him for the first time just last year, after he's long dead.

Perhaps I should explain where I am coming from. I have been using wikipedia since it was founded and use it all the time and am deeply appreciative of contributors such as yourself who have worked long and hard at giving us all these great resources. I got a WP username so I could edit primarily because as a longtime professional editor in my other life it drove me crazy to see all this ungrammatical English and outright wrong information when I read articles. This way I can contribute something back. And I have some expertise, especially in the arts and an interest in improving the coverage of women, particularly women of color in art and fashion.

But I am really only a text editor. I am not a researcher--never was, and never will be. I'm not an academic. So I've run into snags on my third article and realize that the draft I have is pretty much as far as I know how to go. My original intention was to put up not much more than stubs on a humble list of artists and people of note in the art, fashion, and curatorial worlds where Wikipedia has glaring gaps and where I have information, with the hope that others with far more research chops and skills than I have would be able to add to over time. This is especially true of this article on Erik Reel. My original intent was to pretty much do a stub. So now I'm afraid I'm at my limits on this [Erik Reel] article. It has delivered proof to me that creating articles is not for me. Time to stick to simple text editing. I am at a loss otherwise as to what to do, so I am moving on and going back to just simple text editing as I read during my course of wikipedia use.

There are a few other aspects of the Erik Reel article experience that disturb me: someone took an earlier draft of this article and posted it on a site called Wikitia. But there are errors in that draft and since I have nothing to do with Wikitia, never even heard of it before, there is no way I can correct them, except through getting the right information up there on Wikipedia. But I cannot do that if the wikipedia article never gets up there. Everything I have put into this wikipedia Erik Reel draft is accurate, but that means nothing in terms of getting the right information out, if it is never posted.

Further, while I was drafting this article it was made known to me that because of this draft, someone inside Wikipedia or their collaborators, took that information and used it to target my subject with a scam (fortunately it seems my subject is pretty savvy and basically told them to go shove it). I feel very bad about this. Artists are not like movie stars with a retinue of lawyers and corporations around them who can buffer and protect them. They are often working alone, with the barest of resources--especially in these days of COVID 19 when their theatres, museums and galleries are closed down and they have less revenue. So they are struggling. And the artists I want to write about are often older and vulnerable.

So I feel terrible that just because I decided to write about this artist that they were targeted and that incorrect information is now out there on this damn Wikitia site. So I have inadvertently caused harm. This alone makes me very wary of writing any further articles on living people, especially on artists. Maybe some terminology, like a needed article on "circular fashion" or something. Maybe. But again, I'm not a researcher, just a simple text editor. So bits of text editing for me for the future. Thank you for your time, if you got this far, thanks for "listening". Keep safe.Socratesart (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Socratesart (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Creating articles is simply a process of reporting what the reliable sources say about a subject. The subject would need to pass the criteria at WP:NARTIST. Having work in major museum collections will usually be enough, but I don't know if the museums mentioned are notable. Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thereadislong Agree. Thank you for all your help; it is much appreciated. Subsequent discussion clarified that notability is not established. But I learned a lot about Wikipedia, which will help going forward.Socratesart (talk) 14:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Scattered Comics

Hi there:

After reading the reliable sources Wikipedia page, I need a little more guidance as to your comment "zero reliable sources." There are four sources for the page (so far): the scattered comics page itself, two news media interviews, and a Wikipedia cross reference.

Thanks! Mightykieth (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Mightykieth The draft Draft:Scattered Comics needs independent reliable sources, their own website is a primary source so cannot be used to establish any notability and interviews and YouTube are not usually considered a reliable source either. Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference either, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Everett McCorvey draft

Hello, Thank you for reading the proposed Everett McCorvey page and I appreciate your feedback. I'm wondering if you could givew me a little more information from your perspective about how to define his notability. (I understand that the lists of recognitions, academic positions, etc. need to be trimmed or eliminated but I am a little confused whether the concern is that someone who heads an academic program that has achieved recognition and gotten two students to the Met finals, as well as the National Chorale at Lincoln Center and is founder of the world-touring American Spiritual Ensemble is not notable or that I have failed to fully cite those accomplishments. Any help appreciated! Thank you.l Jacalyn Carfagno (talk) 18:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure how getting two students to the Met finals, as well as the National Chorale at Lincoln Center confers any notability whatsoever? Theroadislong (talk) 19:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Hassan Ahmad Khalil draft

Hello, i removed all linkedin references. Regarding youtube, the videos are from the party that interviewed Mr Khalil. you can check the accounts and you can check the videos for the logos. Please advise on how to move forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziad.awwad (talk • contribs) 18:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft Draft:Hassan Ahmad Khalil was rejected, it won't be considered further, I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@theroadislong, how does a rejection happen without giving the editor a chance to re-edit the article? I submitted a revised version of the article, what are the steps needed to make it pass?Ziad.awwad (talk) 19:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Orangemike has given you excellent advice on his talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the information about the Coquitlam Public Library page and for removing content that doesn't follow Wikipedia guidelines. I'll disclose my connection on my main user page and any future proposed changes will go on the talk page of the article. Are there other steps I can take so that the multiple issues warnings can come off the article? Is there a way to restore the old version of the article so that any proposed changes can go the proper route? Thanks,RosanneHCPL (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Miss Colgate best smile

Thulavictorious winning
Thula victorious is a model who won 4 beauty pigeons in Johannesburg south africa Naked it (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your autobiographical draft has no reliable independent sources and winning "4 beauty pigeons in Johannesburg" does not confer any notability I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 10:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

I am very sorry, I mistakenly submitted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadeeqzaria (talk • contribs) 15:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron Molloy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron Molloy. Thanks! UncleTupelo1 (talk) 16:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Dev Mohan

Hi Theroadislong, Hope you are doing well. Need your attention here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dev Mohan, as you recently rejected this draft. DMySon 05:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Muthazhagan / Your comment

Hi Theroadislong Now i have added imdb cast page in References. This will help to get apprioved? Article Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muthazhagan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEOexpertRajarajan (talk • contribs) 08:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Absolutely NOT. IMDb is not a reliable source as it is user edited, it confers no notability whatsoever. Theroadislong (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Help for the page which i try to create

Hello,

i created a page for Timothy Galpin, there were some mistakes. I try to change the text wording and added some new sources. Coul you please check it is ok now or still need to improve that? Thanks for your helps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Timothy_Galpin

regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comery07 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your comments on references of Prof. Sanjukta Deb are inappropriate

This WP:NACADEMIC suggests: "Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." She ticks most of these conditions.

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. --She has 7 patents, published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26

2. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honour (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). --Fellow of Academy of Dental Materials (FADM). --Chair: Royal Society of Chemistry: Biomaterials Chemistry interest group.

3. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. --She has published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26

4. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. --She is a Professor.

5. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. --Ex-president: UK Society of Biomaterials. --Secretary: UK Society for Biomaterials.

6. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. --She is an editor to various scientific national and international journals, for example, Journal of Biomaterials Application (Associate editor), Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering (Associate editor), and Journal of the American Ceramic Society (Guest editor).


There are 13 references cited in this article, but you only need one to publish an article for a PROFESSOR!

-https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/sanjukta-deb

-https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/persons/sanjukta-deb(e9fa9bf9-d206-43c1-ac21-ce33fbef273a).html


You "VERY POOR" judgement needs an appropriate explanation!

Earthianyogi (talk) 19:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Earthianyogi My comment has an explanation... "large parts have no sources at all, where did the information come from?". There are 5 paragraphs with no supporting sources. I'm not saying they are not notable? Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Theroadislong, These two links that I provided above have all the information. If you are saying something else, then I am slightly confused. Thx. Earthianyogi (talk) 19:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

hi this is our first article on wikipedia.we have review and submit for wiki pls published the wikipedia and submit to wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamond909 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Toledot of the Book of Genesis

Hello. I saw you reverted my edit, and you are right indeed: I forgot to add a source. In order to avoid an "edit battle", I write you here.
Do you think that this source is fine? Otherwise, my original source is an old Bible with commentaries, older than the ISBN coding, and I doubt it would do. --Abacos (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller reverted your edit not me, but your source does not look reliable to me, it is just an essay. Theroadislong (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I realized it after I posted the message above. --Abacos (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Ian McEwan - Deletion to protect the privacy of a non-public person (Penny Allen - former wife)

Hello Theroadislong, as suggested I have put my planned change up for discussion on the talk page of IanMcEwan ... Greetings from Germany --Deejott (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Obada Adnan

Hi, I created an article about Obada Adnan before MONTHS , but it was deleted because he was not notable, BUT now , I’m sure he is notable I can’t re-create the article because it has been protected, what can I do? Alex1981march (talk) 10:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Warren Bird

Something tells me you have dealt with prior iterations of this mammoth probable WP:BOMBARD draft 👀 Thank you for adding your comment. I am quite sorry for the assistant Fiddle Faddle 17:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm sure he's not being paid enough! Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Getting that one over the line, especially as a paid editor will be an interesting project. It'll be worth a bonus if they succeed. Fiddle Faddle 17:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Is there any hope for this editor?

Who I suspect is very young.[6] Block? Advise? Doug Weller talk 11:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Seems harsh to block but it doesn't look like they are likely to be very productive any time soon. Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Obada Adnan

Hi, I created an article about Obada Adnan before MONTHS , but it was deleted because he was not notable, BUT now , I’m sure he is notable I can’t re-create the article because it has been protected, what can I do? Alex1981march (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

You would have to discuss this with User:Cryptic who protected the page. Make sure you have at least three independent reliable sources that discuss him in depth first. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

All Saints Parish Hall

Thank you for your advice - I've added architectural detail from the official local listing document and hope that clinches the 'notability'. Really appreciate your help with this. CourtauldGill (talk) 17:08, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Just checking whether the local council's detailed description, quoted in my update, helps to confirm the architectural significance of the building? Also to mention that the architect has a Grade II* listed building in another London borough, so his work is officially recognised as being of high artistic value. Thank you. CourtauldGill (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Independent sources are required really, and notability cannot be inherited, either the building is notable in itself or it's not. Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you - the local council description which I've quoted in full is an independent source - it's written by a knowledgeable officer working for the local authority. The simple fact that the building is "locally listed" by the local authority is a clear indication that it's a notable building - it's not easy to get the local council to add a building to their local list, but its inclusion on that list shows that it's regarded as being of architectural interest and value, and the building is given a higher level of protection (eg from development, alteration, demolition, etc). The building is unique and notable, in Arts & Crafts style (the style itself has its own Wikipedia article), with good quality materials, and it's twice been the focus of an Open House London event in the last few years, when guided tours were given to members of the public (approx. 200 visitors in one day). My article is also about the social history of the building - the building as a focus of social and cultural activity over almost 100 years. I hope this helps to clarify - thank you. CourtauldGill (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Two photos taken today and added to the draft article, showing the unique design of the building. CourtauldGill (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Hello - the article has received some expert detailed attention from User:Paul W, a local building historian who knows the area well, and recognises the architectural quality of this building - I hope it's now acceptable for publication? Kind regards - CourtauldGill (talk) 12:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Regarding my article titled kharbhat

Thank you for reviewing the page.This article is of a geographical location in India. Unfortunately as the place is away from the city there are very few references available. Considering that wiki is a place where we can look up for such information , this page can be used for the same. If the point of rejection is solely because of lack of publicised references , i am not sure if wiki would serve the purpose to enlighten on topics of lesser known nature. I have read articles in wiki that are not based on facts or plain myths without any notable references but they are there because they belong to a famous entity. I believe wiki should be impartial when taking decisions on adding articles as the purpose is to serve as an encyclopaedia reference. I would request you to reconsider this article from an information perspective. If you think that a map or lattitude longitude reference would help , i can add that. Thanks for reconsidering. Pirel thinker (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Gerald Bonner article

I appreciate the need to strike unattributed material, and I appreciate it would have been better to use the preview function, but I posted the transcribed quote from my father's Times letter to check it looked right and was about to add the reference when it was struck down. Can I revert your deletion so that I can at least recover the text that I had painstakingly typed and I will then repost with the atribution (which is 26 May 1984, p.7); I don't want to be sanctioned for defying the moderators.

Incidentally I have access to Gale's online Times through my university, so my link only works for people at Durham. I'm also not sure what the template for newspaper sources may be. Can you advise?

JBonnerAnglican (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Cite news is what you need, but as per the article's talk page, you  are strongly advised not to directly edit the article as you have a conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

If a published encyclopedia article had been commissioned for my father it would almost certainly have been written by one of his colleagues, who would have had a similar conflict of interest. At present, your editor Tribe of Tiger has been kindly working through the material that I have inserted and I have asked him to remove anything that seems personal or inadequately sourced. Ironically, he has been using an online obituary that I helped write and I have been trying to find less personal published sources that will reduce the need to rely on that obituary, so I am surely contributing at least as much to making this an authoriative source?

JBonnerAnglican (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Had the article been written by one of his colleagues, they would also have been advised about their conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing Allan Brodie

Hello! Thanks so much for reviewing the Allan Brodie draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikiwonderhouse/sandbox I have removed information without citation and included more secondary material. Also note that he is an elected Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, London which should count toward notability. I have submitted for re-review. Thank you! KerstingFan (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

My first attempt at an article!

Hello Theroadislong - we met at the Teahouse a few days ago where I was seeking advice about my draft article The Pottery Cottage murders. You kindly offered to accept it for review if I submitted it, which I've now done. I tried to cut it down as much as possible, but it's maybe still too long and rambling. Any advice or guidance would be much appreciated. Thank you. --DSQ (talk) 02:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Daniel Dugué wikipedia page

I added several external sources that are independent from the subject:

1. An article by Juliette Leloup describing his dissertation and published in the Electronic Journ@l for History of Probability and Statistics: http://www.jehps.net/Decembre2010/Leloup.pdf

2. Description of his contribution to the rigorous theory of the maximum likelihood estimator by Stephen Stigler published in Statistical Science: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1207580174

3. Link to the Mathematics Genealogy Project: https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/id.php?id=72828

4. Link to the website of ISUP verifying that he was its director: http://isup.sorbonne-universite.fr/fr/l_ecole/histoire-de-l-isup.html

5. Link verifying all other facts of his biography published in Journal de la société statistique de Paris: http://www.numdam.org/article/JSFS_1987__128__258_0.pdf

Please let me know how can I improve this entry further so that it could be made into an article. He already has a French Wikipedia page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dugu%C3%A9

Athena submission

Hello Theroadislong,

We just see you rejected our submission: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Athena

We don't understand exactly why, because athena was a main pioneer website when we were building the Web of Culture.

Source references (books, magazines, websites) are reliable and completely independent from the athena project.

A copy of some sources can be found here: http://athena.unige.ch/athena/perroud/publications/perroud-athena-links.html However we didn't add this page to the draft.

Please could you explain what should be done.

Yours

Pierre Perroud

Wikipedia Veidehi Gite

Thank you for your suggestion to help me improve the draft. I have made the essential changes, however, I only quoted what I read in independent articles about the subject. Hope you find it appropriate now. Looking forward to getting it published.

help with DRAFT: UBQ Materials

Hey, Thank you for reviewing my draft of UBQ Materials. I have removed passing news references and included only feature news coverage that covers only UBQ. I also added a section on the company's technology. It's a very exciting recycling technology that can reduce the world's carbon footprint and re-use household/municipal waste -- which is good. Hope you will please have another look at the draft. Thank you.

Delhy Tejero draft

Hello, I am trying to publish an article about the artist Delhy Tejero in English, because it is only in Spanish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Delhy_Tejero). It has been rejected because it does not include references about the artist that are independent from the subject itself. However, the references are independent and are academic and published from journals, museum catalogues or news articles. Here are some examples. Could you please give me some further information as to why these references have not been accepted as independent to the subject?

^ Marta González; Josefina Alix; Mercedes Replinger; Ángeles Caso (2019). Dibujantas (in Spanish). Madrid: Museo ABC. ISBN 978-84-949360-4-3.

^ Barrera López, Begoña (2014). Personificación e iconografía de la «mujer moderna». Sus protagonistas de principios del siglo XX en España. Trocadero. Retrieved 28 May 2016.

^ Jump up to: a b c Alario Trigueros, Mª Teresa. DELHY TEJERO Y LA FIGURA DE “LA MUJER MODERNA” (PDF). (Universidad de Valladolid).

^ Jump up to: a b c Cabañas Bravo, Miguel: “Delhy Tejero, una imaginación ensimismada en las décadas centrales del siglo XX”, en Eduardo Alaminos López (comisario): Delhy Tejero, 1904-1968. Ciento once dibujos, (catálogo de exposición), Madrid, Ayuntamiento de Madrid-Museo Municipal de Arte Contemporáneo de Madrid, 2005, págs. 27-54. (ISBN 84-7812-614-7) [1], Consultado el 27 de mayo de 2016 

CAVA, FELIPE HERNÁNDEZ (14 September 2016). "Delhy Tejero, exploradora de la libertad". ABC. Retrieved 2 January 2020.

I am new here

Good morning please time is running out for my assignment. I was asked to edit an article so i need guidance on how to go about it. ie how do i get an article to edit. Thanks so much for your response.


NewsWorth | News Content Creation and Marketplace Platform

NewsWorth is a News content platform to connect Journalists (Citizens, Stringers and Professionals) with Media Houses, we provide Content Certification, Content Copyright and Marketplace to buy and sell news story.


George Cazenove draft page

Hi - Thank you SO much for getting back to me. I have removed all words 'famous' as requested. Is there anything further I can do to get the page live?

submit

Hi, I have again resent my article draft you earlier rejected.

Edits made! Please may you re-review? xx

Hi there!

Thank you so much for reviewing my page 'J-P Conte' submission, I've been in limbo!xx I have amended it (my first submission to wikipedia) so it's a lot more neutral and I'd really appreciate it if you could review it: I'm trying to raise more awareness of positive examples in the public eye on immigrant/PoC/2nd generation Americans and it would be amazing to get this guy out there! (not being paid to do this, just from an immigrant family myself.)

AdvantageGo

Hi,

You left a comment on the review for the submission of my page AdvantageGo, stating that you weren't sure if there was a way around WP:Notability (organizations and companies). As this is all the sources I have available to support my page, please could you deny the publishing of my page? Thanks.

Aaron Molloy

Help me to publish my first draft article

Help to publish my first article Technoto (talk) 05:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

As previously advised, post your request at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By nationality#India. Before you do so, make sure to include reliable sources and also visit notability critera. Theroadislong (talk) 07:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong/Archive_58&oldid=973507042"