Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tbhotch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Well, you know that I always going to say that the article is featured, even if they don't put a star in it. Very good job you've been doing these days. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.02:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for all the work you and all the other users who have collaborated on it. If you need something don't hesitate to contact me here on es.wiki or in commons. I'm watching the FAc anyway. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.19:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
You can save the signature somewhere. Then, edit it in your preferences and change it to the one I told you. Keep a shorter one during the FAC. The FAC delegates do not like long or fluorescent signatures. See SL third nomination. Please Axel. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I see, but I'm going to decline your request. I'm going to sign with three ~~~ at the FAC for the respect I have to you, but I was censored once by this people, I'm not going to be censored twice by them. If they are not comfortable with seeing "long" pages I suggest them to stop doing this as they actually read long pages, no one obligates them to make this work. My signature passes the rules of WP:SIGN in all ways, and even if it doesn't I can ignore the rules as they do here whenever they want.
Sorry Axel. I had not intention to offend you. I am sincerely sorry. It's just that I was told to change my signature and I did not want them to tell you the same thing. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Lol. They told you those words. It seems so odd. I mean they seem to hate you but they like me (I think they do as they always help me with FAs and provide me with the best copy-editors, who do not even take request personally). Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Let that user having an issue with the release date come back. I will tear open his arse. Lol. Sorry for my language but I will not tolerate anyone messing up with this article. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
He better not or else he will regret the day he signed up here terribly. One more support. :D Time I request J Milburn for the media review. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm scared ;). I wait no surprises as the other three FACs. On a side note, DYK that at Spanish Wikipedia I'll have to nominate "Halo" directly to FAC? Unlike here, GAs shouldn't be long and they have to be quite incomplete. A little strange I think. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.07:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Axel, I don't know if I should be writing this but don't be scared as the last two persons' supports = FAC high chance of passing. See their names. I prefer not to write them. Wow, "Halo" will also soon be an FA in Spanish Wiki? Great. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Axel don't laugh but you know I am slow at these things. I did not understand anything you wrote. :P We have two more supports. I am going to work my ass on every Beyonce article. :D Sorry for the language (Actually i saw that this is how Wikipedians say that they are going to work herd :D ). Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I said that is kinda ironic that after I get my first article to be featured, Wikipedia will shut down (now for a day, if the SOPA (soup in Spanish) law is approved it is likely to be indefinite), and that's the translation of what I said. You already work hard on Bey. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.05:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I like the way you write things. Axel, don't worry about the latest comments on "Halo"'s FAC. I think the are are not very serious ones. Perhaps Sandy asked that because she intends to promote it, right? :D Having a real bad time here. :( Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't know why number were changed from "seventy, sixty, fifty, etc" to "70, 60, 50". The MOS states that those changes shouldn't been done without a consensus. If Georgia's comments are not serious, the article will pass within these days. Calvin should contact the same users you did. After many, many, many, many, copy-edits the article is going good. I've gotta go, my internet is failing for a reason (SOPA?) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Actually Andrew changed that. I used the WP:NUMBERS style where only numbers smaller than ten are written in words. But he changed everything to numerical form. Lol, those copy-editors... I am not sure they will want to have a look at it. If you see the edit count of "Halo", they barely have 15 edits on the article. I mean, they do not "copy-edit/re-write", they only "polish". "S&M" needs to be re-written as nearly each and every sentence is problematic. And actually, they do not take requests. My friend Malleus suggested them to me and of course, when I went to their (respective) talk-pages, the first thing I did was to mention who (Malleus) directed them to me. Then, they accepted. Tim Riley looked at the article first, then Brian, then Wehwalt and finally Malleus did the icing on the cake. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Andrew's right. It was recorded in those places. It also includes: Vocals record at New York's Roc The Mic; mixed at The Record Plant, LA. "Si Yo Fuera un Chico" states the same, but it was translated by Rudy (already in the article), and mixed at The Beach House in Miami by Andrés Bermúdez. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Axel. How are you? :D Hey, will you have time to sit and read "Halo" from beginning to the end to see if there are any typos or "a" or "an" missing. Please. I went through the article twice on Thursday but still, it is always nice to have a second pair of eyes read it again. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm fine, I'm reviewing it right now. Happy birthday to "Halo" :). I was thinking that since the article is likely to be approved, if we survive to the SOPA, to the third world war (AKA the first world wide web war), and the 21/12/12, "Halo" can be on the main page on 20 January 2013. I think it may have many points in favor at WP:TFAR. What do you think? Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.19:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Halo is occupies the 5 to 10% of my life. BTW, I revised and revisited the article and I found just very minor issues (falsetto -> falsetto; crescendo -> crescendo). Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
That's very good. And wow at the percentage. :D You are such a huge fan. What do you love so much about the song? I want to know. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't know, really. Since I listeded to it the very first time I fell in love with it. Starting with that angelic intro, to the cascading piano, the message of the verse one, the ricocheting chorus, the verse two, the bridge, and even the sudden outro, in resume, all the song. It is perfect, my definition of an excellently produced song, and unlike many other songs, I can hear it again and again and again. It is the most reproduced song in my Windows Media Player, with 222 reps. (very low being technical), but I don't want to waste it. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
I could not have explained it better. It's her second song I love hate most. The first is "Best Hing I Never Had". Watched this? You watched the video fr "Dance for You"? She is five months pregnant in it. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
She was two months pregnant in that performance. I wonder how much she must have rehearsed for it. You know what you said about DFY was said by a critic? :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
lol, OMFG, I'm currently reverting an user that I cannot understand how s/he continue adding the same nonsense to Wikipedia. Since I left is always the same crap. How about you? Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.03:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Lol, we should create an essay os something like the concept of "fandalism": "Fandal: is a fan, whose fanatism has no boundaries. They can and they will do everything for their admiration, even vandalise Wikipedia, giving their movie and music stars more praise than they have achieved or they even deserve. Similar to 'genre-warriors' these editors shouldn't edit Wikipedia, and they're likely to get banned." Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Tbhotch, I notice you added a new parameter on the talk page of the abovementioned article: "|episode-coverage-importance=low". Should we be using this on all episode articles for the series when we include "|episode-coverage=yes", or was this the only one for which it should be added? I'd like to understand, since I tend to be the one to create the WikiProject Television/Glee task force entries on the talk pages, and I'm pretty sure I created this one based on what we'd used for previous pages. We have about 55 episode articles now, and I'd like to make sure we're doing it right. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for replying; sorry I'm just getting back to you now. Reading the assessment section you pointed to, my initial reaction would be that "The First Time" was at least of "mid" importance to the series because it was the first time two of the couples—Rachel and Finn, and Kurt and Blaine—had sex, a key milestone in the series. I'm less able to gauge whether it would be "high" based on those criteria, because although there was some pre-airing controversy, it seemed to die down afterward. Nevertheless, it did deal with two gay teenage characters deciding to have sex for the first time. I'll be starting up a discussion with the task force to decide what the best rating is for each episode, based on the criteria, but new episode articles will start at low by default. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE banners
Hi
Can you please stop putting the GOCE banners into project shells. GOCE has no intrinsic "interest" in the article, the banner is a record of a major requested copyedit, similar to a review.
I haven't read it (I'll do it when I can). But as far as I know you have to wait 2 weeks for a FAC after a FAC. If you meant size, it is irrelevant as long as the article is complete. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.18:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Ahh okay. Axel, I think I can nominate it as I am a co-nominator on "Halo". :P I just read it. I mean, when you said I have to wait for two weeks, I went at the FAC page to read the rules. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I will review "Footprints in the Sand". Will post comments very soon. I have also one request from you. Jivesh told me that you are good at writing alts on pictures. Can you write all the alts on "Unfaithful"'s pictures, cause I want to work on it and later nominate it for FA. Thanks. — Tomica(talk)19:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I finished the review of the article. You can start working on it. By the way, congratulations on "Halo". You and Jivesh did a very good job there. — Tomica(talk)16:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Future admin
Hey Tbhotch, just to let you know, you are absolutely great at what you do. Should you ever consider being an admin, I am definately going to back you up on this, (hoping you do apply to this) and knowing that you'll be great for the entire community! How about that? Please keep up all the great work that you've been doing, and stay the same just as youn are! Couldn't ask for anything more. Thanks! Best, and cordially your friend, --Discographer (talk) 20:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Look, even many admins get angry at one another. I knew this was a reason you left Wikipedia for so long, though I kept it to myself! Don't feel so bad though, my friend, I never ever want to be an admin! However, you really would be good as one for everybody! I will persuade them all to do what it takes to get you this! Even though one can't forget, they can forgive! If you ever need anyone by your side, I'm here! Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I award you this barnstar for being extremely helpful to me and to others inspite of facing vandalism. I really enjoyed our collaboration on "Halo". May God bless both you and the day I came across a kind and helpful person like you on Wikipedia. I consider myself to be extremely lucky to have a friend like you. And Axel, I also love a lot (brotherly love :P).
Because I wasn't here at the beginning of the month, If I were I'd have a FA, a GAR and a GAN, but I prefer to pass until the next year to prepare myself and use to work at es.wiki, en.wiki, Commons, and the college. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions.07:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
"Except for the word "Tbhotch", of which I reserve all rights, and the design of my signature, which is licensed under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license" - can I copy design of you signature? Bulwersator (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I fixed this. Here, you are the subject, so 'I' is used, rather than me. Think of how you would phrase it if it were just you: shouldn't I be notified about this?. Then just add in the other person. Hope I helped. :) —Andrewstalk04:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
PLUS there was no consensus to change it from New Wave to anything else? The discussion ended and no decision was made, that does not mean change it? You keep it the way it was UNTIL you reach a consensus--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 21:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
My "Contradicting" was because I read your summary wrong, then I posted it, then realized my mistake. But who is this banned editor..?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tbhotch,
Considering your edit on the Bon Iver template: do you mean by "articles are highlighted", the bold appearance when being on the same page as the link points to? And that a redirect prevents this? I think your suggestion of WP:RM is the best way anyway, but I'd like to understand your comment. Thank you, — Quibus (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for explaining this to me and pointing out the discussion about moving the article. Bon Iver ended up in my watchlist by adding a category, I didn't read any of the talk yet, and have no reason whatsoever to contest the articles name. Heaving read the discussion I realise the edit was made by someone who was part of the discussion, but doesn't agree with the outcome, so I'll revert changes made in the discography and other related articles too. Thanks again, — Quibus (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Protection request.
Hello. Sorry to disturb you, but can you protect the articles Yu-Gi-Oh!: Bonds Beyond Time and Yu-Gi-Oh! The Movie: Pyramid of Light? An Irish vandal using addresses on the 86.43.*.* range keeps removing all Japanese references and credits from these pages. It seems that he doesn't want admit these two are Japanese films. He is doing his vandalism long-term. He is also adding hoax "Digimon Tigers" credits to several voice actor pages. BTW, they're listed in WP:RFPP right now, but I read that it is currently backlogged. Thanks in advance. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs08:08, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
"If he moves to another page, which he does all the time, then that page is protected as well." I think that's essentially what I disagree. Doing so is much more counter-productive compared to blocking individual IPs. Deryck C.15:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
That the user is so prolific is indeed why I don't support protection. If the vandal targets a well-defined set of pages, then fair enough, protect them. However, the vandal moves around so many articles that I don't think there's any point in protecting any of them: I don't think protection will reduce the overall number of vandal edits, because he'll simply move somewhere else and do his content vandalism. Yes, we should help protect Wikipedia from liabilities, but I can't see how protecting individual articles will help. Deryck C.14:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
The Born this way ball tour
Hi Tbhotch: I noticed you are redirecting this article to 'Born this way', because you say these infos are not official, I don't know if you saw the link or not but the came from Lady Gaga's Official Twitter. I'm just trying to help. --Marcetw (talk) 00:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
This fan is driving me crazy. I think we need to have it clear in the guidelines that they should be labelled in ABC order, in which 99.9% of the time are. — Status {talkcontribs22:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Axel. How are you my friend? I am currently working on this song. And wow, I am really finding it difficult this time. It seems the article is not ready by any angle. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The rule says that putting flag icons in info boxes is "distracting." I'm not entirely sure what that means. It makes it much more easier to find out what country the person is from and it makes it clear what the flag of that country is, so there is no need to search the country.
In world-wide sports, such as boxing and kickboxing, you see flag icon's everywhere. Icons are commenly associated with world-wide professional athletes. Wouldn't it make sense to have the icons here too? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I admit they are decorative, but is that really such a bad thing? Through out my experiences editing many combat sport pages, I have never found the icons bad, or distracting or interfering. Just the opposite. I can recognize almost every national flag in the world now. I was never good at this type of thing before I started editing here. I think they are much more helpful than distracting. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Don't accuse me of POINT-y behavior when all I'm doing is trying to clean up after apparent falsification of sources by Legolas. Your defense of him should be commended but you ought not get in the way of fixing the problems he created. Binksternet (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
I was stalking your contributions page and all that I have to say is thank you for helping with this WikiProject. I really have no idea what I'm doing and I just want to get the word out. So, thank you with clearing/cleaning up my tracks. Also, I have no idea what you're doing with the Category pages. There should be a line of links directing to the category (FA/GA/A/B/C/etc), but all that I see is a link going to the unaccessed articles category. Devin Davis(talk)22:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
started editing — The verb to start normally takes a gerund; when used with the infinitive, the implication is that the action is singular (rather than repeated or habitual) and was interrupted: e.g., I started to edit the article, but (it had already been deleted/my computer crashed/I immediately suffered an epileptic seizure).
did not like seeing — Note that would not like to see would be grammatically correct. Unfortunately, I am not quite sure why! (The verb want, if used in place of like, would require the infinitive in both cases, while enjoy would require the gerund.)
to which [...] the rights — The customary construction is the rights to [something]; the preposition to is unaffected by the relative-clause transformation.
Thank you. The image appeared to only be illustrating the video in general; nothing spectacular. I have reverted the addition, tagged the file as an orphan and have notified Berbah. —WP:PENGUIN·[ TALK ]20:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Remember the end segment of the show COPS segment edit warring on the page, over unsourced material, based on how the editor in question heard it? Well I finally had enough of it, and believe I solved it in the best manner possible. I just removed all the unsourced material from that sub catagory! (By removing the sub-cat all together) Problem Solved! Both users are also going to be warned.
NECRATSpeak to me06:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello Tbhotch! The music-importance parameter was just fixed and I was wonder if you assess the music-importance for the articles, or at least FA, FL, and GA articles for me. Thanks. Erick (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Lol. nothing important. I just wanted to talk to you a bit. Anyway, how are you Axel? It's been so long we haven't spoken to each other. :( Wikipedia sucks lately. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing WTCS. I created the article for the Uzbek company, and put a redirect to it. That should stop the nonsense.
COPS, 76.97.19.69, and his "edit war"
I filed a notification with the Wikipedia ANI/3Revert board about his continued reverting of the COPS article.
Seven different editors have removed his revert since he started. I thought you should be informed about this, as you were one of the key ones involved with him.
[2]NECRATSpeak to me02:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
WP:MOS
Hi Tbhotch,
Another question on a Bon Iver edit you made: I noticed this edit, but can't find a section in WP:MOS that covers the issue, can you tell me where to look? Thanks, — Quibus (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your elaborate explanation, your point is very clear and I agree it improves the article. I've seen lots of similar edits (and reversions), but wasn't sure how to deal with these, so now I finally have some proper info on the how and why. Take care, — Quibus (talk) 09:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
PS: I noticed your User:Tbhotch/EN page. Congratulations on your level of English; it's not my primary language either so I know how hard it can be. At the level you're communicating, may I suggest you change your level from en-2 to at least en-3? — Quibus (talk)
1. Smack my Bitch up - this is electro-dance song with rap vocals, that's why "electro hop" i added to this genres section
2. Joe Hahn - I added to his genres section: alternative rock and electronic rock because he's in Linkin Park an alternative/electronic rock band. And also in music videos you can see Joe playing MIDI pad (this is sampler with keypads)
3. Radio GaGa - I added to the genres section: electronic rock/post-disco/synthpop, because this is strongly electronic song, but someone reverted it. Here's link to song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t63_HRwdAgk
Regarding reverting the edits: there have been numerous IP edits without sources, it appeared that some sources were added; Were they of questionable integrity? --RichardMills65 (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
i see you undid your undo (LOL!); thankfully it seems someone has gotten the point and found some sources for their content additions. --RichardMills65 (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tbhotch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
.JPG){kind=small}
