User talk:Tamzin/Archive/Old/5

Conversations are archived in their original order; please note that this means that some later additions to this archive will appear higher-up than some earlier ones.

Page unprotected

Just thought I would pop on here and let you know I have unprotected your userpage and added a note to the protection log :) ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 15:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the guidiance

Noted, and thanks for bringing [edit of mine] to my notice. Reviewed it again and realised that it was OK actually, just that the info was controversial.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arctic Kangaroo (talk • contribs) 00:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Article

Please do not edit the delete debate - we have had enough people interfering with this and do not need more people do this and wasting our time.

The comments I have put are relevant and make sense - they are not personal attacks.

I have agreement from the other editors and admins.

Kind Regards,

Philip — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craddock1 (talk • contribs) 11:14, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

I would've really wished you'd brought up your objection before reverting me, but, anyways, here's my response:

• There is absolutely no way that DC's Wikipediocracy/Wikipedia Review activities can be relevant to an AfD. None. You may feel they go to discredit his !vote, but lengthy posts about an editor's behavior are inappropriate for AfD.
• If you think Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs) is unfit to nominate articles for deletion, you can propose a topic ban, though I don't really see the case. If you think he is behaving inappropriately in this AfD, you can take him to AN/I. I also don't really see the case.
• You've just restored an accusation that he is a sockpuppetteer. I request that you either start an SPI or strike the comment. Accusations like this without evidence are unacceptable. Huh. You did it right before I posted this. Quelle coincidence.
• You "have agreement from the other editors and admins"? Could you please name one editor who agrees that these comments are appropriate who isn't currently subject to a sockpuppet investigation? And so far this is the only thing I've seen an admin say on the matter.
• Finally, and I really hate to do this at the end of a post that's far nastier than I normally make, but - please sign your edits. I expect your response here to be signed. For the time being I've ordered SineBot to not edit this page, as a sort of incentive. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 11:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)