User talk:SummerPhD/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 8

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem is Back (2nd nomination)

Hi. You accidentally created the AfD nomination for Eminem is Back at CAT:AFD, instead of a subpage all its own. I've corrected the nom for you, and created the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem is Back (2nd nomination) by copying your original nomination. The previous nom trips a lot of people up, so don't worry about it. Just an FYI, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 16:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

What happened to the "Eminem is back" article?

I removed the template you inserted and gave reason in the edit summary, as it said I should've. Non the less, it was ignored. Why? Udonknome (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Paddock Club

I'd appreciate if you gave a reason. Not like it matters, not that you *have* to, but it would be nice. Lumberjake (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I think my edit summary made it fairly clear, as did the AfD discussion that followed. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitch Music

You didn't finish this nomination; I finished it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Paul Richards (Anthropology)

Saying someone has published multiple books from major publishers is a clear assertion of importance--and usually enough to show importance at AfD as well--as would almost certainly be the result here. But in any case, it is not a speedy, any assertion of importance is enough . DGG (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray discography and template

This is your last warning.
Do not erase the mixtapes, eps, or unreleased albums again or you will be blocked. This is apart of her disco page and profile page. Infostorm (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

ADOR

I appreciate your work deleting stupid waste useless articles, but I do think this ADOR album is notable, at least for its producers. It is widely circulated on the internet, popular, well liked and likewise somewhat unknown. You also deleted ADORs article I assume, so please just leave this one so people know a bit about himCosprings (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Are you deleting articles I started? How do you find that list? Cosprings (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

A.D.O.R. was deleted as a blatant copyright violation.

The Concrete is not notable under WP:MUSIC even if it is well-liked. As an unreleased album it is not notable unless there is substantial coverage in reliable sources. If it is found to be notable at AfD (where you really should be commenting), it is also a copyright violation, subject to deletion. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I see all that except how is it a copyright violation? And what's up with your most recent changes? At least keep it in the prior condition before you took out what you call copyright violationsCosprings (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Don't you ever accuse me of something that i haven't done. i heard about the mess that was happening with her pages, and i registered to help. Infostorm (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I've been accused

I don't care what you say, I am one person. And since when do I care what you have to say. You just doing this because you hate Nicole Wray. Soccermeko (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• lol... of course nothing to do with the fact 85% of the nicole wray related articles fail WP:A! Cloudz679 (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Anxiety (album)

Just letting you know that you relisted a discussion from 2006 when putting Anxiety (album) up for AfD; I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Question

do the references that i post, fail in stating that the album, eps, and mixtapes exist. reply as soon as possible. Soccermeko (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I do not doubt that they do exist, but that does not mean they are notable. This has been discussed with you, at length, under various of your user names. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

==Sockpuppetry case==

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mdsummermsw for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Soccermeko (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Kilgarvan

I am currently as I type reediting the article with more citations (which I may add are not exactly plentiful on the web considering how little net access we have down here). You will see when I am finished my intentions are sincere and it is not my article wikipedia can be edited by anyone, I however have contributed most of the info to this particular page. I welcome ypur input also --Netwhizkid (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AFD nom of The Declaration

I was going to comment on the AFD nom, but the link on the article page is wrong. It links to this, which is about a student newspaper, and the discussion is already closed. ≈Alessandro ♫ ^{T • C} 16:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Prod removed from Final Call (album)

Just to let you know, in case you missed it, the prod was removed from Final Call (album) by an anonymous IP without giving a reason. Unfortunately a prod being removed by anyone but a vandal, for any reason but vandalism, is considered valid and the prod can't be added back, but you can start an AfD on the article. Just thought I'd let you know. -- Atama^chat 18:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Log Out in In

Well now you know how I feel. Why would i need another user page. Just because i alert some of the NIcole Wray fans, you think that a reason to start a sockpuppet case. And just because we created some of her album pages, you think we are the same person. Get real or get out and don't bother repling back, your comment will just be deleted no matter what you do. Soccermeko (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Slow Down

I would encourage you to slow down your prod and AFD nominations. I also encourage you to follow the spirit of guidelines and not use them as written law. Also please carefully read the articles before you prod them, something you clearly failed to do before proding I Murdered Mommy. You have also nominated several albums that are clearly notable. Ridernyc (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray Single Chart Position

Can you please add this informaton back. I have the billboard links to prove which chart the song hit and what number.

All N My Grill #64 in Billboard 100 and #16 on Hot R&b/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks Go to Missy Elliott's discography page.

I'm Lookin' hit #66 on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=367&cfgn=Singles&cfn=Hot+R%26amp%3BB%2FHip-Hop+Songs&ci=3042849&cdi=7761531&cid=09%2F15%2F2001

Do Ya Thing hit #65 on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=367&cfgn=Singles&cfn=Hot+R%26amp%3BB%2FHip-Hop+Songs&ci=3063886&cdi=8532327&cid=01%2F28%2F2006

Soccermeko (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

ANI

You are welcome to comment here [1] Ridernyc (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Quick note regarding Kiley Dean

Hi. When looking into the ANI discussion about your deletions, I clicked on some of your past edits randomly and came across Kiley Dean. You appear to have prodded the article and then AfD'd it when an anon removed the prod, but you forgot to begin the discussion on the AfD page and may have forgotten to list it in the log as well. If you've changed your mind, you may wish to remove the AfD message, otherwise you probably want to start the discussion. Natalie (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Once Again

Calm down You are nominating things that are clearly notable. [2]. Ridernyc (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Possible deletions

Hello, I like your campaign of deletions. I was wondering if you wanted to take a look at the Dr. Dre discography page and see what you think about all the bootleg albums they got there, as you have a much better hold on the process of deleting than I. ThanksCosprings (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are looking to delete there. Could you please clarify? - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm trying to delete all the "2 thousand" albums which are bootlegs on a bootlegs label. Basically all the compilations besides the best of's and Dr. Dre Presents the Aftermath. Also, could you look at Terraform (album), another unreleased album which is proving hard to delete. Also, if you want take a look at Category:Styles Of Beyond albums, full of non-notable stubs for deletion. ThanksCosprings (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The process is fairly straightforward. After ensuring, to your own satisfaction, that the album in question is not notable, check the history for any prior PRODs or AfDs (they should also be mentioned on the talk pages). With no previous attempts, your first option is a PROD.

1) Simply add {{subst:prod|**REASON**}} to the top of the article, replacing "**Reason**" with a brief explanation.

2) Add {{subst:prodwarning|**Article name**}} ~~~~ to the first author's talk page.

3) Watch and wait. At this point anyone can remove the tag for any reason, with no need to explain. Otherwise, the article will be deleted in five days or so.

If the PROD is removed and there is no improvement/demonstration of notability, your next step is an AfD.

1) Add {{subst:afd}} to the article. A box will be added to the top of the article, with steps to follow.

2) Open the "Preloaded debate" link and follow the steps there.

3) While following the directions on that page, be sure to open the "today's AfD log" link in a new browser tab or window (it's easier that way).

4) Once you've followed those directions, go back to the article page, find the original author and any substantial contributors to the article and notify them with {{subst:adw|**Article Name**}} ~~~~ .

5) At this point you can either let the debate go by itself or watch the debate for anything that changes your mind or to challenge bad assumptions.

Good luck.

Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Erykah Badu Discography

You need to watch my edit and worry about your own sorry self. Second of all, it was already source and confirmed by "Erykah Badu" herself. Stop wasting space on my talk page. Thank You! Soccermeko (talk) 02:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

SAMSHA link

Why was this link removed in the Substance abuse article? It had nothing to do with DMOZ which had been there before. And it's relevant. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Attack You

I did not attack you, you attacked me!

So get it straight

Soccermeko (talk) 15:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop changing it

stop leaving messages Soccermeko (talk) 16:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Another editor responded: [3]. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 23:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Archiving Your Talk Page

Would you like me to archive your talk page?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Josh Gotti/ Big Hunnah

I know you have a lot of interaction with Josh Gotti/Tracey Foster/etc. Could you take a look at Chanemane15's contributions, and give me your opinion on whether or not he's another sock?Kww (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Creating the Nicole Wray Lovechild page

if i show what will be on the page, can i create it. it want consist of the same information. 4.154.56.48 (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Do not call me Soccermeko

I am not Soccermeko. I trying to keep this peaceful, but you want to go accuse me because you think I am someone else. Don't do again. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.154.4.178 (talk) 22:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I called you Soccermeko because you are Soccermeko. [4] - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry Case

Hello, I was involved in this Sockpuppetry case, and I would like to know if the matter is officially closed, or if it'll be closed by an admin, just like in an afd debate. Thank you, Victao lopes (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't really know. Considering Soccermeko, Nicolefan, Fan196, JosephP89, and Infostorm have all been indefinitely blocked, I'm not at all concerned. I am watching these IPs and others, but it's probably easier to just watch all of the articles (all the Nicole Wray articles, plus those connected to her (like Mocha (rapper), Missy Elliott, One Day at a Time (album), etc.) to weed out all of the unsourced stuff and kill the non-notable articles. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I understand. I'm going to remove the warning from my talk page, then, because I believe that a Sockpuppetry accusation is really not good for my reputation. Thank you, Victao lopes (talk) 00:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Please be aware of this edit to my talk page. Cloudz679 (talk) 11:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Quan (rapper)

An editor has nominated Quan (rapper), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quan (rapper) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 8