Jump to content

User talk:Sumancranebuddy21q00

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello

[edit]

Please anybody do correct in highest grossing indian bengali movies section because somebody do wrong edition there Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributionsโ€”specifically this edit to Dwitiyo Purush (film)โ€”because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DarkAudit thank you for your contribution But could you lock this page because I have a complaint that most of the persons do wrong edits sk could you check this. It would be good for all users for Wikipedia members. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease. Stop making repetitive requests. You've had your answer. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for my behaviour @Favonian Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon Please do not remove the {{copyvio/core}} template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates will be blocked from editing. VickKiang (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Atanka moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Atanka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Josey Wales Parley 21:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atanka (October 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vidyasagar (1950 film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Vidyasagar (1950 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles ๐Ÿ—ฉ ๐Ÿ–‰ 20:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Atanka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidyasagar (1950 film) (October 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
โ€” Ingenuity (talk โ€ข contribs) 12:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest domestic net collection of Hindi films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naseeb. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ โ€ข Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suhaag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shatru (1984 film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Information icon An article you recently created, Shatru (1984 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz๐Ÿ’ฌ 18:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shraddhanjali moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Shraddhanjali. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹๐‹๐จ๐ซ๐๐•๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿง™โ€โ™‚๏ธLet's Talk ! 07:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Srikanta Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Srikanta Guha Thakurata, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Srikant Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

[edit]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Srikant Guha Thakurata, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Srikant Guha Thakurata moved to draftspace

[edit]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Srikant Guha Thakurata, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Shraddhanjali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Vidyasagar (1950 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vidyasagar (1950 film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Information icon An article you recently created, Vidyasagar (1950 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz๐Ÿ’ฌ 13:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shraddhanjali moved to draftspace

[edit]

Information icon An article you recently created, Shraddhanjali, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz๐Ÿ’ฌ 13:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shraddhanjali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shatru (1984 film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Shatru (1984 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹๐‹๐จ๐ซ๐๐•๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿง™โ€โ™‚๏ธLet's Talk ! 06:17, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jawan userbox

[edit]

You can use this userbox

This user is eagerly waiting for Shah Rukh Khan's Dunki.

if you want by using this code

{{User:Tousif.15/Userboxes/Jawan}} Tousif โฏโฏโฏ Talk 04:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bees Saal Baad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ghayal, Bang Bang and Deewana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the highest-grossing films by year you have made many changes which is not required..as only one movie should be there in one year....so kindly revert those edits. Harshit Kumar (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing films in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dharam Veer and Mard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the table "Highest-grossing films by year"

[edit]

In the table "Highest-grossing films by year", you have made many changes which is not required..as only one movie should be there in one year....so I had to remove all your changes. I also added in the "See also" section a link to the article "Lists of Hindi films" - in it you can see the 10 highest grossing films of each year SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok as your name is satyamevJayate , very good that you are close to your nation , I like that fact , I just want to add all blockbuster movies , that's it if you thought that every year 1 movie is blockbuster then wrong , I don't the person who edit very silly in List of highest-grossing Indian films section where he/she add 2 movies in the year 2009 , you can see it - 3 idiots & Magadheera , so this is wrong na , very wrong, at that year 2009 only 3 idiots did very well. Okay what you thought do it . Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The HIGHEST- GROSSING FILM of the year, as a rule, is only one. And there can be several blockbusters in a year - for example, in 2006 there were four blockbusters - Dhoom 2, Lage Raho Munna Bhai, Krrish, Vivah. The table you edited contains information about the highest - grossing film of each year, not about the blockbusters of each year. These are different concepts. Devdas (2002), for example, is not a blockbuster - it was only a hit at the box office, but it was the highest grossing film of the year, so it made it into this table.
If you feel like making a list of all the blockbusters of the year, you can create a new article. But please do not distort the correct information available. Thanks for answering.:-) SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok
I apologize for my this , for now onwards this fact is correct that in every year only 1 movie did well. You are wrong , raaz was blockbuster in Bombay itself
But devdas is hit all over the india. I did worng don't you In 2006 only dhoom 2 did well in all over india . Not other 3. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The name of the table we're talking about is "Highest-grossing films by year", not the blockbusters by year, and not the list of movie did well by year.
If you look at this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hindi_films_of_2006, you will see that Dhoom 2 is the highest-grossing movie of 2006.
Maybe the thing is that in your language there is no concept of superlative adjectives (high - the highest, big - the biggest etc)? SatyamevJayate (wd) (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also say that only dhoom 2 is blockbuster in 2006 , others are flop. basically wikipedia is used by "leftist" Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

[edit]

Basicslly satyamev jayate reality is Wikipedia is used by leftists. They did wrong edit to The Kashmir Files Theboywonder2001 (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srikant Guha Thakurata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vidyasagar (1950 film) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shatru (1984 film) 2

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shatru (1984 film) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shraddhanjali 2

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shraddhanjali 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Rajan51. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Schminnte (talk โ€ข contribs) 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey I didn't attack rather he delete the entire wiki page of List of highest-grossing films in India this . please check this man he just destroy the page man !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! how can I stay calm Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Personal attacks and swearing don't solve anything: please stay civil during content discussions. Schminnte (talk โ€ข contribs) 16:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
then you solve this page again please Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page is still there? Schminnte (talk โ€ข contribs) 16:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Am I done joke to u man just solve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it please Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Destroyed"? What are you on about? This was my edit on that page. I merely corrected the numbers used in the table based on the respective sources. -Rajan51(talk) 16:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
listen fucker u just remove the highest Grossers by year completely remove the table why? Why?
What I did is nothing wrong ok Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was not me. And the user who made that edit provided a reason in the edit summary. Check the page's edit history before talking nonsense. As for what you did, it was wrong. Don't abuse anyone or delete their pages. -Rajan51 (talk) 12:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, knock it off with that attitude or your block may be extended by the admins. ๐Ÿ›งLayah50โ™ช๐Ÿ›ช ( ่ฉฑใ™? ไธ€็ท’ใซ้ฃ›ใผใ†๏ผ) 13:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at User:Rajan51, you may be blocked from editing. Schminnte (talk โ€ข contribs) 16:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you may have against other editors, blanking their user page is not the way to go. Schminnte (talk โ€ข contribs) 16:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srikanta Guha Thakurata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sumancranebuddy21q00 (block log โ€ข active blocks โ€ข global blocks โ€ข contribs โ€ข deleted contribs โ€ข filter log โ€ข creation log โ€ข change block settings โ€ข unblock โ€ข checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been block for unkonwon reasons

Decline reason:

The reason is stated in the notice above. Please make a new request and place it below, discussing that reason. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2023

[edit]

Because you persisted making profane personal attacks after being blocked, your block is now indefinite and your talk page access has been revoked. Please read WP:UTRS for your unblock options going forward. Cullen328 (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shatru (1984 film)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sumancranebuddy21q00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shatru (1984 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]