Jump to content

User talk:Soman/Archives/2020/May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WikiCup 2020 May newsletter

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
  • England Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
  • Botswana The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
  • Somerset Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
  • England Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Gondor Hog Farm with 801, Venezuela Kingsif with 719, Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce with 710, United States Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and Mexico MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks, --Soman (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Der Komunist (Vilna), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kopek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anak Mindanao (logo).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anak Mindanao (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General Jewish Labour Bund, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexandrovsk and Gorodok (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Palafsymbol.PNG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Palafsymbol.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 17:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

General Jewish Labour Bund (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Kalvaria, Sedlice and Siedlec
Mongol National Organisation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Janajati

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mimbar.PNG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mimbar.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 07:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Translation on BKS

I agree that organisation is more of a translation of Sangathan but it can be applied for Sangh too, for instance the article on the RSS which is it's parent org is using Organisation as the translation for Sangh. On the other hand, I don't believe Union would be an appropriate translation of Sangh which more so is akin to Association. I took a look at Collins dictionary and it seems to provides an array of translations including all the three but gives precedence to Association over Organisation or Union. What are your thoughts? Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm not a linguist per se, and all of these terms are related somehow. Is RSS itself using 'Organization' as translation? --Soman (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Taking a look at the english version of the RSS website, they don't seem to directly translate the name at all. It keeps using the word Sangh in english though it does use "social organisation" as a descriptor of itself. The BKS website describes itself as a "farmers organisation" as well as "prime representative association for farmers" rather than an union, though I wouldn't call it a direct translation of the name either. Tayi Arajakate Talk 18:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Sudan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudanese Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  1. New York (state) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
  2. Christmas Island AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
  3. Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
  4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
  5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
  6. United States Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
  7. England Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soman/Archives/2020/May&oldid=1113378821"