Jump to content

User talk:Sock/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10
This archive covers all talk page posts between 2012–13.

File permission problem with File:Austin Thornton.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Austin Thornton.jpg, which you've sourced to Source = "Ides Of March Studios" sounds like a copyvio to me. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 14:25, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Of Machines

Template:Of Machines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Gongshow Talk 21:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Trout

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For making Template:Of Machines, a template with a whopping two articles in it. Oh my, that's just so many articles! Someone could get lost navigating them; let's put a big blue box down there so we don't get lost! WP:NENAN and all that. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

That was so long ago I actually forgot I ever made it. Thank you for that. Yikes, past-version-of-me. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 02:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
You could propose Template:At The Throne of Judgment for deletion to make up for it. (Before the hammer notices and blows a gasket.) I think it can be speedy deleted if the author proposes it. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 07:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited A Fairly Odd Movie: Grow Up, Timmy Turner!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Weber and David Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesse Lawson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jesse Lawson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Nickaang ←chat 02:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Loiter Squad.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Loiter Squad.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Melissa and Scott on The Walking Dead

You really need to get with the program, no offense. There are links given next to their names on the casts list for a reason. They've both been part of the main cast since Season 3. According to both Melissa McBride and Gale Anne Hurd themselves, being in the opening credits or not means nothing. It's legalese. Thus....please refrain yourself from reverting anything else, as your edits/reverts now will technically count as spamming. Thanks. - User talk:Molcoo (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, first off, don't be a dick about this. It's ridiculous, and an unnecessarily aggressive first step. I just read the article about them being main cast, which I hadn't seen before I made the change, so I apologize. Also, how do you decide what's spamming? There's a policy here called the three-revert rule, which hasn't occurred yet. So even if I were to revert, I wouldn't be spamming. Don't say something you don't know about. Regardless, I'm not reverting, glad we got this settled. Corvoe (speak to me) 13:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't intend to come off so rude (my first sentence probably sealed the deal in that regard), so you have my apologies for that. Regardless, I still suggest that, in the future, you make a habit out of looking for reference links on pages before reverting particular edits. Thanks. - User talk:Molcoo (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I definitely agree that I was in the wrong, and I'm glad you brought it to my attention. I usually do that, just hadn't thought to in that circumstance (you must admit it's a pretty weird policy on AMC's half). Also, you just pleasantly surprised me. Thank you for apologizing, wasn't expecting it at all. You're all good in my book. I'm happy this went down with (minimal) bloodshed (: Corvoe (speak to me) 00:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jesse Lawson

The article Jesse Lawson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PeterWesco (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: This does not refer to the article you created, which was replaced by a redirect years ago. It refers to a promotional article about a completely different person called Jesse Lawson. It is, in fact, nothing to do with you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

I was a pinch puzzled by that. Thank you. Corvoe (speak to me) 23:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Django Unchained, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Senior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TIAHBMISITIAHLKIAS.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TIAHBMISITIAHLKIAS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Invitation

You are invited to this admin talk right here. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Olympus Has Fallen

Look, I know your reason for doing what your doing. But the names on that poster of that movie are there and that's the reason we should keep them on the infobox. BattleshipMan (talk) 19:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It's an admin's decision at this point. They might make an exception, or they'll stick to policy. As far as policy is concerned, you're wrong. Practically speaking, you're making sense. I'm just...well, not a sysop, so I can't really make that decision. Corvoe (speak to me) 19:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunshine (2007 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

In-character narrators

Robert Downey Jr. should not be credited as a narrator on Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang.

From Template:Infobox film

Note: do not include actors with a role in the film; this is not a place for in-character voiceovers.

- Richfife (talk) 22:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

That damn template getting me confused with what is policy and just common practice. Thanks for the heads up. I didn't see the previous revert and I honestly forgot I'd done it before. Corvoe (speak to me) 23:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Fuck contribution

Thanks very much for your helpful contribution to Fuck (film), much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Happy to help. I love that movie. Corvoe (speak to me) 19:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laura Cayouette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Now You See Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheAlmightyTallest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TheAlmightyTallest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ms Bitters.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ms Bitters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Of Mice and Men album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Of Mice and Men album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

actors in plot summary

Hi, can you point me to the guidelines or standards that say the actor names should be removed from the plot summary? -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

You brought up a good point and caused me to dig and look for any policy stating that either is true. As it turns out, the policy IS to use actor names in plot summaries, so feel free to revert any of those edits I've made. However, I've opened a discussion at the WikiProject Film talk page asking for opinions to remove this particular part of the policy. A comment, be it in favour or in opposition, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Corvoe (speak to me) 14:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm okay with keeping it to headliners (names on posters) and notable cameos announced ahead of time where appropriate. It also depends if the lead paragraph already does a lot of linking; but most usually don't and only list the main star and his/her role in the film. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Olympus Has Fallen

Hey, there. I do know the plot summary of Olympus Has Fallen needs to be trimmed down and there is clutter to deal with. But there is some things that should left out how the main villain gets killed and such, not to mention the names of the actors who portray the characters, which at times would help some readers avoid confusion on which ones they are. I did leave out some things you deleted, which is why I didn't revert your edit, just set up a new one to bring some things back to it. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Info you added to Steve Anderson (director)

Hi there, it looks like you may have added unsourced info to page Steve Anderson (director).

Do you have reliable secondary sources for the info you added, to back it up so we can make sure it's verifiable and then cite it properly using inline citations? — Cirt (talk) 02:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you please respond to this? — Cirt (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Apologies, didn't see the first message until you posted the second one. I added the Santa Monica thing and his birth year after reading it on IMDb, which I realize in hindsight that I really shouldn't have done. I saw that you removed the age and I've removed the residence. My mistake. Corvoe (speak to me) 11:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! — Cirt (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheAlmightyTallest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TheAlmightyTallest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 10:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ms Bitters.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ms Bitters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 10:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Revived interest in the film Infernal Affairs

Invitation to participate in the poll for Infernal Affairs.

From your edits for the film Infernal Affairs there is presently a poll taking place on The Departed film Talk page regarding whether you believe a separate subsection should be included for (a) Infernal Affairs as a source for the plot of The Departed film, and/or (b) a second subsection for the recently captured crime figure Whitey Bulger as the source for the character played by Jack Nicholson in the film.

The recent capture of Bulger has revived the question from two years ago of Infernal Affairs from when it did have a separate subsection on The Departed film page which was deleted by User:RepublicanJ, now known as User:OldJ. Invite to visit The Departed Talk page, to the Bulger section at the end of the Page, to participate in the Poll currently taking place. 208.120.96.227 (talk) 11:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to In the Loop (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Capaldi]]<br />[[Tom Hollander]]<br />[[Gina McKee]]<br />[[James Gandolfini]]<br />[Chris Addison]]<!--- per poster --->

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Stebbings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Outer Limits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zodiac (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

The Godfather

Thank you for the "thanks"!
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh Buzzard | — 18:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the edit! If I had read that part, I probably would've tried to change it myself, so I'm glad you were on the ball. Corvoe (speak to me) 23:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Pleased to have *met* you!
Cheers!
— Gareth Griffith-Jones| The Welsh Buzzard: Cardiff born and bred | — 08:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

3:10 to Yuma

I edited a correction to the plot of 3:10 to Yuma which you reverted for having "far too much detail". I added three lines, relating to the pivotal moment of the film, to a 35 line plot summary. I'll defer to your view on what is too much detail because you've been doing this longer than me (although if the plot section was too long before, it definitely remains too long now). The point of this message is that the same error I was trying to fix is still there. Evans wasn't a deserter, and it doesn't say he was anywhere in the film. I explained what the problem was in the talk page and transcribed the relevant piece of dialogue. The plot summary is now incorrect. Instead of getting into a running battle over edits, can you suggest a form of words that isn't too long? Simply "he was shot by his own side" won't do it; but any longer and I am concerned we'll be back where we started. Thanks very much Even better than that (talk) 17:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Let me lead by saying you've earned about 20,000 points for handling my revert like this rather than starting an edit war. Veterans of this site seldom do that anymore, so thank you very much. To the point, "far too much" was probably overkill, however, your edit made the plot summary over 700 words, which is against WP:FILMPLOT. I've rewatched the film since reverting your edit, and you're definitely right that calling Dan a deserter was largely due to an incorrect assumption. I'm going to comb the plot for other details I can remove, because at present, the plot is only about 50 words over the limit. Corvoe (speak to me) 23:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Glad we're on the same page, and thank you for listening to me! I leave it in your hands. Even better than that (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks much

Thank you for your research noted at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 03:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 9 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monte Money

The article Monte Money has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP. There are no independent sources with in depth coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Santa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Family Guy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Blurred Lines 23:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Apologies for that; my iPhone tends to be inconsistent as to whether or not it puts my edit descriptions through or not, and it obviously didn't in this case. I did have an edit summary, I promise. I removed co-executive producers for a fairly simple reason: I've never seen them listed on any other TV articles. Ever. Granted, I tend to look more at film articles, but even still, it seemed out of place enough for me to think it was warranted to remove them. Also, my reasoning for removing the ubl template around the editor should be pretty self explanatory. Hopefully I've adequately explained and can revert back to the edit I made, if you think it's reasonable. Corvoe (speak to me) 04:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I have reverted my own edit since you provided a reason here, so happy editing! Blurred Lines 04:17, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for being willing to hear me out. Happy editing to you as well! Corvoe (speak to me) 04:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airborne (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Conway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attack Attack!

Template:Attack Attack! has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. STATic message me! 23:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Of Mice & Men

Template:Of Mice & Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. STATic message me! 23:09, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss May I

Template:Miss May I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. STATic message me! 23:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer right

Hi there,

Just wanted to let you know I've fulfilled your request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer and granted you the reviewer right. Thanks for helping out and let me know if you have any questions. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:09, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of accolades received by Lincoln (2012 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |[Satellite Award for Best Picture|Best Picture]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Bishara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insidious (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

H. Jon Benjamin

  • The article is called "H. Jon Benjamin", the title of the infobox is "H. Jon Benjamin", it's not necessary to repeat his name in the image caption, we know it's H. Jon Benjamin
  • There is no reliable source for "Henry"
  • A YouTube video of HJB himself denying "Henry" is a reliable source for HJB's own opinion
  • Anyone interested in finding out more about where he was born is going to hit the "Worcestor, Massachusetts" link. It's extremely unlikely that a reader is going to want to know more about Massachusetts itself.
  • Etc, etc, etc

Please stop edit-warring, your edits are not improving the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

  • How is the Los Angeles Times not a reliable source? And if it isn't, why is it used to source H. Jon Benjamin as his name when it clearly says "(his first name is Henry)", and LA Times definitely meets WP:RS.
  • Even still, he explicitly said he wouldn't say what the H stands for, so while he may have said it isn't Henry, there's a reliable source that at least thinks it's Henry, so it's worth noting somewhere.
  • This one doesn't make sense. I pipe Worcester, Massachusetts so the link is only one Worcester, then leave Massachusetts and U.S. unlinked. Not seeing this issue here.
  • This was not helpful.
I wasn't attempting to edit war, and neither of us violated WP:3RR, so lets not go throwing nasty words now. I don't have an issue with you at all, but we need some kind of resolution to this. You make good points, but I have fair counterpoints as well. What do you suggest we do? We need to compromise somehow. Corvoe (speak to me) 10:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have said there is no reliable source for "Henry Jon Benjamin" being his birthname. The LAT is indeed reliable for "Henry is his first name", which is not the same thing.

There no reason for any pipe whatsoever. The place is "Worcester, Massachusetts", the link is Worcester, Massachusetts. Why muddy things up with piping? Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

It's a force of habit. As a tendency, articles only have the city linked, regardless of the link's inclusion of the state/county/province/whatever the hell. I can leave that alone. However, United States is almost never written out, so I'm going to shorten that back to U.S., and I'm going to re-add "Benjamin" to the front of the photo caption. Also, since it says it's his first name, should we put it in the lede? Like my revision, but without Henry Jon Benjamin in the infobox. I'll wait for you to answer before I make any of these edits, and I'm sorry we got off on the wrong foot. Corvoe (speak to me) 11:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I've made some of those changes. Please do not re-add "Benjamin" to the caption, it's completely redundant, since it's absolutely obvious who the photograph is of - do you have any doubt? Then why would a reader? Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Dujardin, Wolf of Wall Street

Hi Corvoe, you reverted my edit on The Wolf of Wall Street movie. I have seen the film and the Dujardin character is called Saurel throughout and in the end credits. I am also eligible to vote in BAFTA awards (British version of Oscars) and I received my electronic ballot today. When I look in the Acting category, Dujardin is nominated as playing the role of Jean Jaques Saurel. Best wishes Mick gold (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockout (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brussels International Film Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 21 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Nebraska (film)

Hi. Are you sure the lists "should reflect the titles of their source articles"? I only ask because during the FLC for List of accolades received by Atonement, I was told to remove the disambiguator in the title since there was no reason to disambiguate per WP:PRECISION. Since there is no other article on Wikipedia with a similar title, I don't think the list needs to be disambiguated, despite the source article being so. - JuneGloom Talk 02:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm basis that on a tendency I've seen in article titling. I can't say there's a set policy, so I could definitely be wrong. I was just operating under assumption based on other articles titles. Maybe bring it to WikiProject Film to ask for further advise. Corvoe (speak to me) 02:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SDCC13 - Gravity panel (9345233475) cropped.png

Thanks for uploading File:SDCC13 - Gravity panel (9345233475) cropped.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

The link on flikr says " Some rights reserved", but doesn't explicity state WHICH. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Moving accolade pages

I just left a comment at WT:FILM. Did not see your revert, otherwise I wouldn't have moved American Hustle accolades page yet. But I still think it should be moved. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sock/Archive_4&oldid=1200999367"