User talk:Selenamiler
|
June 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Bioline allergy, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Bioline allergy
[edit]I have nominated Bioline allergy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioline allergy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Verbal chat 10:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Copyright concerns
[edit]Hello. It seems that the text of this article may be a direct translation of its sources into English. In addition to the concerns raised at the AfD, this is a serious concern for the usability of the article, as direct translations are derivative works and these under United States law can only be licensed by the copyright holders. If the article is in fact a direct translation and it is not deleted as a result of community discussion at that deletion debate, we will need verification that the copyright holder permits its use here, which releases it under the licenses of Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike and GNU Free Documentation License. This means that the text can be modified and reused, even commercially, so long as credit is provided and so long as no one attempts to impose their own copyright over it, even if modified. If you are connected with the copyright holder and wish to donate this text in this way, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure. If you are not the copyright holder but believe that you can obtain permission anyway, the procedure is at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Even if the text is donated, it may be necessary for it to be modified to meet Wikipedia's needs, and if the community determines that the article does not meet inclusion guidelines at this time, it may be deleted.
I am sorry for the complications you are encountering. We do appreciate your contributions, and I understand that some of the policies and guidelines can be confusing. I have placed a "welcome mat" at the top of your userpage which has some links you may find helpful, including links to help forums where you can obtain assistance and answers to general questions. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bioline allergy
[edit]A tag has been placed on Bioline allergy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - 2 ... says you, says me 19:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
[edit]- rxhealthdrugs.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.rxhealthdrugs.com
- free-health-recipes.blogspot.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.free-health-recipes.blogspot.com
- synthol.blogspot.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.synthol.blogspot.com
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Sildenafil, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Dirk Beetstra T C 14:21, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please don't copy and paste from external sources
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Rabeprazole article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page.
(same goes for Festal)
Hello, Selenamiler. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
MichaK (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerenetalk 11:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)