User talk:Yodavadisquo

Nomination of Sunil Kalda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunil Kalda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Kalda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yodavadisquo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a glaring misuse of blocking without adequate communication with the user regarding any edit or contribution which in my case have been purely non business or promotional purpose. Scribbleyard my user name is not a business entity. It's an art & craft endeavor which also seek to enrich wiki with content relevant to Chhattisgarh, Bastar and Kondagaon from where I hail. Kindly unblock or defend your block allegations with verifiable evidence. oh! and by the way I am James

Decline reason:

Block is entirely appropriate. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I made this block due to this report stating the fact that your username is that of a website, which is not permitted. 331dot (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You emailed me claiming I blocked you. This is not the case. Your block log is available here and shows I was not involved. If you wish to be unblocked, please read WP:GAB. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked, you need to make a successful unblock request that addresses the reason for the block; for guidance, please read the page Yamla links to above. Please do not email me further about this matter. 331dot (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request for unblock

{{unblock-spamun|jamespaulindia1986|(a) requesting unblock with due apologies for any unintentional content policy breech (b) changing username from Scribbleyard to jamespaulindia1986 which denotes my name in full ie. James Paul, my birth year and the nation of origin (c) hereby I plead ignorance and innocence to any misconduct whatsoever in any capacity (d) I would be careful with new wiki entries and edits hereafter (e) pledge to contribute in the spirit of wiki with honesty and integrity, honoring the wiki decorum non refert quam multos sed quam bonos habeas. IT IS QUALITY RATHER THAN QUANTITY THAT MATTERS Seneca (c. 4 BC – A.D. 65) 12:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)}}

"I plead ignorance and innocence to any misconduct whatsoever in any capacity" So you are saying you are not aware of anything you've done wrong and haven't done anything wrong? That's grounds to leave the block in place. --Yamla (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(responding to email) I do indeed think your unblock request would be more likely to be successful without that line. I think you intend that line to mean something different than most readers will believe it means. To any reviewing admin who gets here before Scribbleyard comes back, consider ignoring that line in the unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request for user name change and unblocking

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yodavadisquo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

JamespaulIndia1986 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

(a) Requesting again for unblock with due apologies for content policy breech brought into notice by the admins. (b) Changing username from Scribbleyard to JamespaulIndia1986 denoting my name in full, my birth year and the nation of origin. (c) I would be careful with new wiki entries and edits hereafter. (d) I would thoroughly read all policies, mandates and SoPs that help strengthen the 5 pillars of wiki (d) Pledge to contribute in the spirit of wiki with honesty and integrity, honoring the wiki decorum. kindly guide me through any other glitches and bloopers I (may) have committed whilst submitting this request.

sincerely James

non refert quam multos sed quam bonos habeas. IT IS QUALITY RATHER THAN QUANTITY THAT MATTERS Seneca (c. 4 BC – A.D. 65) 19:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 17:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re: unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yodavadisquo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

yodavadisquo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Dear admins, I am truly apologetic for not diligently following wiki precepts whilst editing and creating content. I apologize to all users and admins I've interacted with during this period causing confusion. I am sorry. I will not repeat any policy violation and engage in content vandalism or advertorial/promotional content creation/manipulation/edit etc. in any of the wikis. Post my unblock I wish to contribute substantially on subjects relevant to Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarhi language, Halbi dialect, Bastar, Kondagaon, Indian Animation etc. adhering to the guidelines. My key areas of Interest are Animation, Indian archaeology, Indian philosophy, Linguistics, regional policies of prominent states of India, Naxal movement, Hindi grammar, Wiki content localization etc., to name a few. Kindly revoke my block. I shall be really grateful. non refert quam multos sed quam bonos habeas ~ Seneca 08:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have globally renamed Scribbleyard to Yodavadisquo, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]