User talk:Saph

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Saph668, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Hellenization of Anatolia to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 11:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellenization of Anatolia (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hellenization#Anatolia instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I recommend merging this info with Hellenization#Anatolia. Not enough here for a standalone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hellenization of Anatolia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saph668! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 10:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not too familiar with the templates here. Thanks. Saph (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garry Nolan

Hello Saph. You left a note that my addition to Professor Garry Nolan had been removed and that i had left no sources. I don't have the knowledge on how to do that on Wikipedia. What I do know is that Garry Nolan himself on a you tube video explained he was born in Liverpool England. I thought I'd update his wiki to reflect this information.

The link to this video is.https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxr_YLZtkMrzhAohSbJuOsmTVUMOf694t5?si=TQYgqkv1BOuducp8

Ref: minute. 2.06. 2A00:23C7:9D81:E501:E80C:D4C4:8D61:D69C (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added -saph (user—talk—contribs) 15:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jenrick Pornographer IP

Hey there,

The IP adding pornographer to the description of Richard Desmond is right - the man is notable as a pornographer, as evidenced by the lede of his article and the coverage of him both during and before the scandal. I've re-added the claim with a citation, hopefully this should calm the situation down somewhat. CR (talk) 12:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]