User talk:Psycharpax

Welcome!

Hello, Psycharpax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red

Hello Psycharpax! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating entries for women's biographies and related topics and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, you can sign up under "New registrations", or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! ~~~~

-- TJMSmith (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Haddock Acevedo has been accepted

Jorge Haddock Acevedo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TJMSmith (talk) 03:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quebradillas mayors

It'd be nice to see a source for the list of mayors. Do you happen to have a source? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 02:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fundación Jaime Benítez Rexach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fundación Jaime Benítez Rexach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Neighbors moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andrew Neighbors, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 15:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Neighbors (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NBIO is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Neighbors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Neighbors, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico

Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jorge Báez Pagán

The article Jorge Báez Pagán has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Losing local candidate fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 06:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Neighbors

Hello, Psycharpax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Neighbors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Neighbors

Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Neighbors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --Ferien (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Lanskoy

"recieved", "succesful", and "potrayed" are misspellings, "received", "successful", and "portrayed" are correct. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people considered a founder in a Humanities field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berline. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jay Torres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Torres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster _talk 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Jay Torres at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Jay Torres

Just for information for the future... you shouldn't remove your original comment entirely from any discussion or talk page on Wikipedia, as it will seem like you are trying to hide something (I know this isn't your intention, I am not accusing you of it), and another editor may restore your original comment. If you change your mind or want to change your statement, you should just strike it out, and then write your updated comment afterward. Richard3120 (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jay Torres interview on Telemedellín Vitrina Trendy program.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jay Torres interview on Telemedellín Vitrina Trendy program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jay Torres Interview on Telemedillín's Vitrina Trendy program.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jay Torres Interview on Telemedillín's Vitrina Trendy program.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for FBOY Island

On 19 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article FBOY Island, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that FBOY Island sets three female contestants to identify twenty-four men as either womanizers or nice guys? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/FBOY Island. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, FBOY Island), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dolores Rivera Candelaria" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dolores Rivera Candelaria. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 10#Dolores Rivera Candelaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of last descendants of notable individuals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of last descendants of notable individuals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of last descendants of notable individuals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Special-T (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello Psycharpax. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to FBOY Island, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Psycharpax. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Psycharpax|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – Joe (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to confirm that I have not received compensation for my edits to the Wikipedia article for FBOY Island nor any other contribution I have made on other Wikimedia sister projects. Psycharpax (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Devastated the island of Puerto Rico" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Devastated the island of Puerto Rico and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Devastated the island of Puerto Rico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jay Torres

Hello, Psycharpax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jay Torres, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Psycharpax

Thank you for creating United States Semiquincentennial Commission.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Walker (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Walker (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Walker (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mpen320 (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Psycharpax

Thank you for creating George Washington Museum of American History.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Psycharpax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry if any action I have taken was perceived as a conflict of interest. I did hold a month-long internship with the Institute of Puerto Rican Culture during the month of June. If employed in the future, as I am currently a university student, I will of course disclose any and all conflicts of interest per the paid editing disclosure requirements. Psycharpax (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the existence of non-public evidence, you should probably follow the request below and appeal to Arbcom. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

You clearly have a conflict of interest, and you've added promotional content. On the other hand you have a DYK. ~~One of the reasons for your block is a promotional user name, so we need to address that.~~. misread @Joe Roe: can you help me understand the user name issue? Is what they've said otherwise sufficient? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I don't remember there being any issue with Psycharpax's username – did I say that somewhere? I don't think their unblock request above sufficiently addresses. The off-wiki evidence shows that they have been taking commissions to write articles and, ironically, the Puerto Rico-related edits were the only ones I thought weren't COI. – Joe (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Misread the block notice. The template confused me thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Psycharpax: I don't know why users are so reluctant to disclose their PAID status-- to the point of dissembly and evasion. PAID editing is allowed. undisclosed paid editing is not. I'll leave the request open for the sake of renewed discussion, but at this point a decline would be justified. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you both, @Joe Roe and @Deepfriedokra for taking the time to protect Wikipedia from edits that go against its principles. I have never been offered nor have I ever asked for any sort of payment or remuneration for any edit I have ever committed on Wikipedia and its sister projects. I am aware, even before the block, of the requirement of disclosing paid edits. However, I cannot admit something I have not done, even if it would restore my one and only account and on which I have worked every edit of mine since April of 2020. It was never my intention to undutifully provoke a promotional stance on any edit I have published. How would I be able to prove that I have not received any compensation whatsoever from my volunteer work, except that of the satisfaction itself of contributing to Wikipedia? Psycharpax (talk) 14:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your denial is simply not plausible given the nonpublic evidence. You are better off appealing to the arbitration committee if you want to continue to dispute this, but you're not going to be unblocked unless you start being honest. – Joe (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has unblocked this account after a successful appeal. Izno (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Papalaya

The article Papalaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, local chain of food trucks in an promotional article that cites advertisement in an attempt to establish WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atsme 💬 📧 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jay Torres

Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jay Torres".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commencement at the Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez

The article Commencement at the Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, most coverage is WP:ROUTINE or not independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This is America 250.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is America 250.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:This is America 250.gif

Thanks for uploading File:This is America 250.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Éternité section - 2024 Summer Olympics opening ceremony

Hi Psycharpax,

I wanted to let you know why I removed "after singing a few notes of La Marseillaise." Céline Dion did not sing a few notes of the French national anthem after her performance of "Hymne à l’amour." As per this La Montagne article (in French) a few notes of La Marseillaise were played after, and separate from Dion's performance at 23h 29. Also a review of Dion's 2024 Opening Ceremony performance, which is widely available online, confirms she did not sing or play a few notes of the French national anthem, La Marseillaise. Wiredwidget (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]