User talk:Prof.PMarini

Paediatric vs pediatric in Queensland Children's Hospital

Hi there! I just wanted to let you know that I've reverted your change to Queensland Children's Hospital - in Australia, we use -ae in the word paediatric. You can see this spelling on the Children's Health Queensland website. If you have any questions, feel free to {{Ping}} me in your reply 😊 Tim (Talk to me) 10:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Prof.PMarini! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help needed improving article on Fernando Amorsolo, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Johan Eliasch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 07:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Johan Eliasch. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Just a question: wouldn't using the word "undemocratic" be against neutrality? I mean if 40 abstained, there were still 77 votes for Eliasch.

Another thing, the article we both read mentions 15 signed the letter to protest the election, not exactly that 15 walked out. There may be a better way to phrase the sentences in the page. Prof.PMarini (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you mean "some delegates called the elections undemocratic", it would be not neutral if a wikipedia editor called the elections undemocratic but using a source which calls them that is OK. On the contrary, redacting their opinion based on the editor's opinion on the elctions would be non-encyclopedic, non-neutral, biased. As for those 15, you replaced it with 10, so I hope there was a source for 10 walk-outs? Or a better one for 15? Inany case, the article needs a better source but of course a more precise phrasing is also welcome. Also, regarding your edits, going through the links in my notices above, and perhaps more general help on editing, would prevent further misunderstanings regarding citing sources etc. Thanks, WikiHannibal (talk) 12:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Johan Eliasch, you may be blocked from editing. WikiHannibal (talk) 12:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commonwealth Joe Coffee Roasters (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Valereee was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see significant coverage in independent reliable sources. All of this coverage seems to be in very local or very niche sources. Can you point us to the three that are the best?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Commonwealth Joe Coffee Roasters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Valereee (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prof.PMarini! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Valereee (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Economou has been accepted

Peter J. Economou, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 10:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Prof.PMarini (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natcom Bancshares, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superior High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wang Gang has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wang Gang. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Hoffer has been accepted

Daniel Hoffer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Gang (computer scientist) has been accepted

Wang Gang (computer scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Commonwealth Joe Coffee Roasters

Hello, Prof.PMarini. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Commonwealth Joe Coffee Roasters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Reigelman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Reigelman. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I updated the reference link for Smokers. I apologize I must have pasted a different link when I generated the reference link. Prof.PMarini (talk) 10:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Reigelman has been accepted

Mark Reigelman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 11:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Prof.PMarini. Thank you for your work on Appointment Trader. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bartolome G. Santos has been accepted

Bartolome G. Santos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbritti (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Appointment Trader for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appointment Trader, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appointment Trader until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nolly C. Buco has been accepted

Nolly C. Buco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]