User talk:Dronkle/Archives/2010/April
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dronkle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You're being discussed on my talk page
Hello Peter. Please see User_talk:EdJohnston#WP:OUTING. EdJohnston (talk) 03:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Composers confusion
Hi Peter, it seems we have two composers called David Downes and a bit of a question as to whether either or both are notable. Any chance you could have a look? The Kiwi one seems more your genre. ϢereSpielChequers 18:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello
Nishidani took a look at some of the points I had presented at the talkpage, and has now said that he has done what he can [1]. There are still several points left at the talkpage that hasn't been looked through yet or finished discussing, those being nr 3,5,6,7,8. You said at my talkpage that you was busy with something but that you could maybe take a look the next week, and that was several weeks ago. Do you think you have some time now for this? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Gustav Mahler
I have sent Mahler for peer review. Any comments or criticisms are welcome. I have (I hope) dealt with the issues you raised on the list of compositions. Brianboulton (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
I left a message on the talkpage
I left a message on the talkpage for you,[2] You know that you are a honest and neutral editor and thats all that matters.
NT has made an edit to the article without replying to your post on the talkpage. In the edit he made he also changed what me and Nishidani talked about on the talkpage and he changed Nishidanis edit, so besides the remaining points I mentioned before, once again, a look at nr 4 also. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Asmahan
Peter, thank you for your message on my talk page. SD has for the last 9 months made every effort to be the sole editor of Asmahan and other pages in the Asmahan arbitration case. Other editors are either banned from contributing or are completely disgusted by SD's ways that they are staying away for the time being. You cannot achieve consensus under these circumstances. Any input from you on behalf of SD will be one-sided and far from agreement and is therefore not neutral and will reflect only SD's input and will be subject a lot of more disputes. While you may be an unbiased editor, you cannot be a neutral broker while SD has harassed all other opinion to the point where they are no longer contributing. Your innocent "mediation" will be only a powder keg waiting to explode. I, personally, have no time for more endless arguments on the talk pages, however, I will revert any statements that have not received consensus with all parties prior to the arbitration.SD is subject to a topic ban specifically related to Asmahan due to his extremely disruptive behavior, while I am not under any restriction. While I am busy to be a regular contributor, I cannot allow SD's continued pushing of a Syrian agenda. -- Nefer Tweety (talk) 07:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- The Nefer Tweety account received a warning for this comment: [3], Peter? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I've closed the peer review after a number of substantial comments and suggestions. I have nominated the article at FAC, and your comments will be most welcome there. Brianboulton (talk) 15:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)