User talk:PeterJones1380

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Hare Psychopathy Checklist‎ appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Hare Psychopathy Checklist, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:DuncanDouble.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:DuncanDouble.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:PatrickBracken.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:PatrickBracken.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Davidingleby.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Davidingleby.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Smallcritpsych.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Smallcritpsych.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Critical Psychiatry, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Critical Psychiatry was changed by PeterJones1380 (u) (t) deleting 18006 characters on 2009-07-16T11:36:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Davidingleby2.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Davidingleby2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Istcol (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Psych

Who is David Ingleby and what relevence, of any sort, does his picture have to the article?Postcard Cathy (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're still working on a page, it can be useful to add {{inuse}} for a couple of hours, or {{Under construction}} for a few days, to show that it's a work in progress. PamD (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am still confused as to who he is.... And how this article is different than the one on Critical psychology. I am deleting the picture as irrelevant. When and if you can tell us why his picture should be there, you can put it back. Postcard Cathy (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YOu don't need my authorization. But you could have answered my questions directly; followed Pam's suggestions so we know what is going on; and you can do the best job possible with what you have. It wouldn't take long to write that Ingleby is .... (founder, leader, whatever)..... In the amount of time it took you to type your response, you could have edited the article to say who he is.Postcard Cathy (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of a rescue job on this article, from sources I found with Google. When you're feeling up to it I'm sure you can add much more, but please remember to cite sources for information or quotes. Please don't give up on editing Wikipedia! PamD (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]