User talk:Paul Castro

Re: Hélia Correia

While it is important to sign your messages on talk pages with "~~~~", you should not sign contributions to articles themselves. Per WP:OWN, no single editor possesses ownership over any article. The record of who made what changes can be seen in the article's history page; there is no need to sign the page itself. Thanks, and happy editing! —Swpb ^{talk contribs} 18:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Balada de Praia do Cães

The article you wrote, A Balada de Praia do Cães, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article.Eli Falk 08:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BaladaPraiaCaes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BaladaPraiaCaes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BaladaPraiaCaes-1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BaladaPraiaCaes-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Belarmino 1b.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Belarmino 1b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Belarmino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Belarmino.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Belscreen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Belscreen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense edits

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops...

Looks like I jumped the gun on your new article. Sorry about that! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PMDrive1061 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Vimala Devi

I've fleshed out the article a little with information gathered from checking Worldcat (although the Swedish National Library has one book of hers in Esperanto mis-cataloged as being in Portuguese). Can you provide some sources and cites for the article? --Orange Mike | Talk 14:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal correspondence is not a reliable source, and is not acceptable for anything you want to add to an article. We need impartial, published third-party sources. (If you are in correspondence with her, give her greetings from a fellow Esperantist.) --Orange Mike | Talk 20:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to remove the poem, as that is a copyright violation. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Vimala Devi Portrait.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Vimala Devi Portrait.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Paul Castro! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Henrique de Senna Fernandes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Reilly Pic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Reilly Pic.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Infrogmation (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Telo_de_Mascarenhas_in_1940s.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Telo_de_Mascarenhas_in_1940s.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 22:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fernando Vendrell

The article Fernando Vendrell has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 13:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Nam Van (short stories), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Light Drops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Monsoon (short stories)

A tag has been placed on Monsoon (short stories) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 13:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ananta Rau Sar Dessai, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salazar and Estado Novo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For steady work improving the representation of non-European Lusophone writers on Wikipedia Alarichall (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month

Hi, thank you for participation in Wikipedia Asian Month. Please fill out the survey that we use to collect the mailing address. All personal information will be only used for postcard sending and will be deleted immediately after the postcard is sent. If you have any question, you may contact me at Meta. Hope to see you in 2016 edition of Wikipedia Asian Month.--AddisWang (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dissimilar words between Portuguese and Spanish

Att: User talk:Paul Castro

I would be grateful if you stopped interfering and undoing my entries which have taken a lot of investigation and dedication over many months to put together and are absolutely accurate.

You appear not to understand the scope of this, and I would draw your particular attention to the passage which clearly explains the section:

Dissimilar words[edit] Despite the mostly cognate vocabulary between Spanish and Portuguese, a significant number of common words are entirely different in the two languages (although in some cases, cognates exist but are rare or archaic in one of the two languages). Examples include the following:

And please stop trying to tell me how to use Priberam (which is rather incomplete, as a supposedly reliable source) and particularly trying to "teach me" Portuguese. Words like carreteira or rincao feature in the Portuguese dictionary but are ARCHAIC and not used regularly in Portuguese. Very few Portuguese speakers would know what "rincao" or carreteira actually mean as they are simply NOT USED. The same way "alcaide-mor" or "braga" are ARCHAIC words which for centuries have not been used in the Portuguese everyday language. Words listed on this section like "estrada", "canto" and all the others on this list are recurrent, everyday words, in Portuguese. The idea with this section, is to show that Portuguese and Spanish use a lot of everyday words which are from completely different etymologies. Even if in some cases a common cognate could exist for the same meaning but is not used as the norm.

Finally I actually graduated in Humanities at the Coimbra University (amongst others) so in answer to one of your pointless questions, yes I speak Portuguese in fact more fluently than most people. Do you?

As this is not the first time you have tried to interfere with my Wikipedia contributions, any further action from your end will be deferred as vandalism.

Best regards, (Melroross (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Dear "Paul Castro",

You are welcome to add a new section (or any others to that matter) dedicated to archaic cognates with Spanish. "leira" and countless other words are used in Portuguese every single day "uma leira de milho" for instance means one "raia" in Brazilian Portuguese... hence the name Leiria, meaning an area of "leiras". I have never heard "rincao" or "carreteira" in Portugal, nor Angola or in Mozambique for example, neither have I ever noticed those words in my many visits to Brazil. But I am not a "Brazilian Portuguese" expert. In Portuguese "em um" or "em outro" simply do not exist and you have "num" or "noutro", words like "abacaxi" or "mamao" even though a lot of people would understand their meaning, are in fact imports from Brazil with the correspondent words ananas or papaia. And these are just a few examples as I am sure you will be aware of. In Portuguese the word vaga is much more used than onda in official weather forecasts. To my knowledge the term does not exist in Spanish. While we are at this, why are you so "sensitive" about my pointing out obvious differences between these two languages? Are you an Hispanophile by any chance? I have no prejudice or dislike towards the Spanish, but a border was created and has existed between Portugal and Spain almost 1,000 years ago for reasons more than mere political- the Luso-Gallaecians were very self-aware way before the County of Portucale was formed. So the idea of a unified "Iberia" appears to have never existed in any way. It is a fact that Portuguese as a language/culture has substantially more vocabulary than Spanish, less Arabic influence and has kept more Celtic/pre-Roman fragments and I think (although there is no serious study on that) subsequently absorbed more French influence, maybe because of the House of Aviz and other aspects. And going back to the "Lusocentrism" as opposed to "Brazilianism" these are social, cultural and historical divergences neither you nor I can change... I am sure that in 50 years' time and despite the "acordo ortografico" (which to a large extent I disagree with), Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese will be even more different than they are now. As you well pointed out, European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese are two distinct variations of the same language and maybe Wikipedia should reflect a Portuguese version and a Brazilian Portuguese version like a number of Internet and other media do. Melroross (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul Castro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]